Plant and Soil

, Volume 287, Issue 1–2, pp 95–116 | Cite as

Soil microbial loop and nutrient uptake by plants: a test using a coupled C:N model of plant–microbial interactions

  • Xavier Raynaud
  • Jean-Christophe Lata
  • Paul W. Leadley


We have developed a spatially explicit model of plant root and soil bacteria interactions in the rhizosphere in order to formalise and study the microbial loop hypothesis that postulates that plants can stimulate the release of mineral N from the soil organic matter by providing low molecular weight C molecules to C-limited microorganisms able to liberate into the soil enzymes that degrade the organic matter. The model is based on a mechanistic description of diffusion of solutes in the soil, nutrient uptake by plants, bacterial activity and bacterial predation. Modelled soil bacterial populations grow, mediate transformations among several forms of nitrogen (mineral and organic) and compete for nitrogen with plants. Our objectives were to see if we could simulate the stimulation of turnover of the microbial loop by exudates and to study the effects of diffusion of C and N in the rhizosphere on these different processes. The model qualitatively mimics most of the characteristics of the microbial loop hypothesis. In particular, (1) plant exudates increase the growth of bacteria in the soil and (2) increase the degradation of soil organic matter and N mineralisation. (3) The increased bacterial biomass induces an increase in predator biomass and, as a result, (4) plant mineral N uptake is increased threefold compared with scenarios without exudation. However, the temporal dynamics simulated by the model are much slower than observed dynamics (the increase in uptake appears after a few months). Taking into consideration the diffusion of C and N containing molecules in soil has large effects on the spatial structure of the bacterial and predator biomass. However, the average biomass of bacteria and predators, N mineralisation and plant N uptake were not affected by these properties. The model provides a quantitative and mechanistic explanation of how plants could benefit from liberating low molecular organic matter and the subsequent stimulation of the microbial loop and increases N mineralisation.


Plant–bacteria interactions Exudates Microbial loop hypothesis Barber–Cushman model Competition Mutualism Nitrogen Carbon 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We gratefully thank three anonymous referees and the editor for valuable comments on a prior version of this manuscript. Computer source code of the model is available from X. Raynaud upon requests.


  1. Adamowicz S, Le Bot J (1999) Trends in modelling nitrate uptake. Acta Hort 507:231–239Google Scholar
  2. Ajwa HA, Rice CW, Sotomayor D (1998) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in tallgrass prairie and agricultural soil profiles. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:942–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barak P, Molina JAE, Hadas A, Clapp CE (1990) Mineralization of amino acids and evidence of direct assimilation of organic nitrogen. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:769–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber SA, Silberbush M (1984) Plant root morphology and nutrient uptake. In: Barber S, Bouldin D (eds) Roots, nutrients and water influx, and plant growth. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp 65–87. Special publication 49Google Scholar
  5. Betlach MR, Tiedje JM, Firestone RB (1981) Assimilatory nitrate uptake in Pseudomonas fluorescens studied using nitrogen-13. Arch Microbiol 129:135–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonkowski M (2004) Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. New Phytol 162(3):617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buesing N, Gessner MO (2003) Incorporation of radiolabelled leucine into protein to estimate bacterial production in plant litter, sediment, epiphytic biofilms, and water samples. Microbiol Ecol 45:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen CR, Condron LM, Davis MR, Sherlock RR (2002) Phosphorus dynamics in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne l.) and radiata pine (Pinus radiata d. don.). Soil Biol Biochem 34(4):487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarholm M (1981) Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soils—impact and importance. Microbiol Ecol 7:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarholm M (1985a) Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 17(2):181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarholm M (1985b) Possible roles for roots, bacteria, protozoa and fungi in supplying nitrogen to plants. Ecol Interact Soil 4:355–365Google Scholar
  12. Clarholm M (1989) Effects of plant–bacterial–amoebal interactions on plant uptake of nitrogen under field conditions. Biol Fert Soils 8:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman DC, Ingham RE, McClellan JF, Trofymow JA (1984) Soil nutrient transformations in the rhizosphere via animal–microbial interactions. In: Anderson JH, Raynew ADM, Walton DHW (eds) Invertebrate–microbial interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35–58Google Scholar
  14. Darrah PR (1996). Rhizodeposition under ambient and elevated CO2 levels. Plant Soil 187:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daufresne T, Loreau M (2001) Ecological stoichiometry, indirect interactions between primary producers and decomposers, and the persistence of ecosystems. Ecology 82(11):3069–3082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dijkstra AF, Govaert JM, Scholten GHN, van Elsas JD (1987) A soil chamber for studying the bacterial distribution in the vicinity of roots. Soil Biol Biochem 19(3):351–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrar JF, Jones DL (2000) The control of carbon acquisition by roots. New Phytol 147(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gahoonia TS, Asmar F, Henriette G, Gissel-Nielsen G, Nielsen NE (2000) Root-released organic acids and phosphorus uptake of two barley cultivars in laboratory and field experiments. Eur J Agron 12(3–4):281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gee CS, Pfeffer JT, Suidan MT (1990) Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter interactions in biological nitrification. J␣Environ Eng 116(1):4–17Google Scholar
  21. Grayston SJ, Vaughan D, Jones D (1996) Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl Soil Ecol 5:29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregoritch EG, Beare MH, Stoklas U, St-Georges P (2003) Biodegradability of soluble organic matter in maize cropped soils. Geoderma 113:357–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grundmann GL, Debouzie D (2000) Geostatistical analysis of the distribution of \(\hbox{NH}_4^+\) and \(\hbox{NO}_2^-\)-oxidizing bacteria and serotypes at the millimeter scale along a soil transect. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 34:57–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guggenberger G, Kaiser K (2003) Dissolved organic matter in soil: challenging the paradigm of sorptive preservation. Geoderma 113:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton EW III, Frank DA (2001) Can plants stimulate soil microbes and their own nutrient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass. Ecology 82(9):2397–2402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harte J, Kinzig A (1993) Mutualism and competition between plants and decomposers: implications for nutrient allocation in ecosystems. Am Nat 141(6):829–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodge A, Paterson E, Grayston SJ, Campbell CD, Ord BG, Killham K (1998) Characterisation and microbial utilization of exudate material from the rhizosphere of Lolium perenne grown under CO2 enrichment. Soil Biol Biochem 30(8–9):1033–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodge A, Robinson D, Fitter A (2000) Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing nitrogen? Trends Plant Sci 5(7):304–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Høgh-Jensen H, Wollenweber B, Schjoerring K (1997) Kinetics of nitrate and ammonium absorption and accompanying H+ fluxes in roots of Lolium perenne L. and N2-fixing Trifolium repens L. Plant Cell Environ 20:1184–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ames RN, Hunt HW, Morley CR, Moore JC, Coleman DC (1986a) Trophic interactions and nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid grassland. I. Seasonal dynamics of the natural populations, their interactions and effects on nitrogen cycling. J Appl Ecol 23:597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ames RN, Hunt HW, Morley CR, Moore JC, Coleman DC (1986b) Trophic interactions and nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid grassland. II. System response to removal of different groups of soil microbes or fauna. J Appl Ecol 23:615–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen LE, Nybroe O (1999) Nitrogen availability to Pseudomonas fluorescence df57 is limited during decomposition of barley straw in bulk soil and in the barley rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(10):4320–4328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones DL, Darrah PR (1992) Resorption of organic components by roots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere. I. Resorption of 14C-labelled glucose, mannose and citric-acid. Plant Soil 143:252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones DL, Darrah PR (1993) Influx and efflux of amino-acids from Zea mays L. roots and their implications for N-nutrition and the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 156:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones DL, Darrah PR (1995) Influx and efflux of organic-acids across the soil–root interface of Zea mays L. and its implications in the rhizosphere C flow. Plant Soil 173:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones DL, Hodge A (1999) Biodegradation kinetics and sorption reactions of three differently charged amino acids in soil and their effects on plant organic nitrogen availability. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1331–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones DL, Edwards AC, Donachie K, Darrah PR (1994) Role of proteinaceous amino acids released in root exudates in nutrient acquisition from the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 158:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones TH, Thompson LJ, Lawton JH, Bezemer TM, Bardgett RD, Blackburn TM, Bruce KD, Cannon PF, Hall GS, Hartley SE, Howson G, Jones CG, Kampichler C, Kandeler E, Ritchie DA (1998) Impacts of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on model terrestrial ecosystems. Science 280(5362):441–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Biodegradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as related to its properties. Geoderma 113:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaye JP, Hart SC (1997) Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12(4):139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Killham K (1994) Soil ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Koops H-P, Pommerening-Röser A (2001) Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphazising cultured species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 37:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Korsaeth A, Molstad L, Bakken LR (2001) Modelling the competition for nitrogen between plants and microflora as a function of soil heterogeneity. Soil Biol Biochem 33(2):215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuchenbuch R, Jungk A (1982) A method for determining concentration profiles at the soil–root interface by thin slicing rhizospheric soil. Plant Soil 68:391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuzyakov Y, Raskatov A, Kaupenjohann M (2003) Turnover and distribution of root exudates of Zea mays. Plant Soil 254(2):317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lähdesmäki P, Piispanen R (1992) Soil enzymology: role of protective colloid systems in the preservation of exoenzymes activities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 24(11):1173–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leadley PW, Reynolds JF, Chapin FS III (1997) A model of nitrogen uptake by Eriophorum vaginatum roots in the field: ecological implications. Ecol Monogr 67(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liljeroth E, Kuikman P, van Veen JA (1994) Carbon translocation to the rhizosphere of maize and wheat and influence on the turn-over of native soil organic matter at different soil nitrogen levels. Plant Soil 161:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loreau M (2001) Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model. P R Soc London B-Biol Sci 268:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mary B, Recous S, Darwis D, Robin D (1996) Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil. Plant Soil 181:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meier-Wagner J, Nolden L, Jakoby M, Siewe R, Krämer R, Burkovski A (2001) Multiplicity of ammonium uptake systems in Corynebacterium glutamicum: role of amt and amtb. Microbiology 147:135–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Merrick MJ, Edwards RA (1995) Nitrogen control in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 59(4):604–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15(6):679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nielsen KL, Lynch JP, Jablokow AG, Curtis PS (1994) Carbon cost of root systems: an architectural approach. Plant Soil 165:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nye PH, Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil–root system. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  56. Owen AG, Jones DL (2001) Competition for amino acids between wheat roots and rhizosphere microorganisms and the role of amino acids in plant N acquisition. Soil Biol Biochem 33:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Papavizas GC, Davey CB (1961) Extent and nature of the rhizosphere of Lupinus. Plant Soil 14:215–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paterson E (2003) Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity. Eur J Soil Sci 54(4):741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paul EA, Clark FE (1989) Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 275Google Scholar
  60. Pelmont J (1993) Bactéries et environement: adaptations physiologiques. Presses universitaires de Grenoble, Grenoble, FranceGoogle Scholar
  61. Prescott L, Harley J, Klein D (1999) Microbiologie, 2nd edn. De Boeck Université, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  62. Riha SJ, Campbell GS, Wolfe J (1986) A model of competition for ammonium among heterotrophs, nitrifiers and roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1463–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rønn R, Gavito M, Larsen J, Jakobsen I, Frederiksen H, Christensen S (2002) Response of free-living soil protozoa and microorganisms to elevated atmospheric CO2 and presence of mycorrhiza. Soil Biol Biochem 34(7):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rønn R, Ekelund F, Christensen S (2003) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on protozoan abundance in soil planted with wheat and on decomposition of wheat roots. Plant Soil 251:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strobel BW (2001) Influence of vegetation on low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids in soil solution—a review. Geoderma 99:169–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taylor JP, Wilson B, Mills MS, Burns RG (2002) Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biol Biochem 34:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000) Solute movement in the rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  68. Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Mary B, Nicolardot B (2000) C and N fluxes of decomposing 13C and 15N Brassica napus L.: effects of residue composition and N content. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1717–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van Breemen N, Finzi AC (1998) Plant–soil interactions: ecological aspects and evolutionary implications. Biogeochemistry 42:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Hees PAW, Vinogradoff SI, Edwards AC, Godbold DL, Jones DL (2003) Low molecular weight organic acid adsorption in forest soils: effects on soil solution concentrations and biodegradation rates. Soil Biol Biochem 35(8):1015–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verhagen FJM, Hageman PEJ, Woldendorp JW, Laanbroek HJ (1994) Competition for ammonium between nitrifying bacteria and plant roots in soil in pots; effects of grazing by flagellates and fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 26(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verhagen FJM, Laanbroek HJ, Wolendorp JW (1995) Competition for ammonium between plant roots and nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria and the effects of protozoan grazing. Plant Soil 170:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vinolas LC, Healey JR, Jones DL (2001) Kinetics of soil microbial uptake of free amino acids. Biol Fert Soils 33(1):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams M, Yanai RD (1996) Multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis and ecological implications of a nutrient uptake model. Plant Soil 180:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams MA, Rice CW, Owensby CE (2000) Carbon dynamics and microbial activity in tallgrass prairie exposed to elevated CO2 for 8 years. Plant Soil 227(1–2):127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright DA, Killham K, Glover LA, Prosser JL (1995) Role of pore size location in determining bacterial activity during predation by protozoa in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(10):3537–3543PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Raynaud
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-Christophe Lata
    • 1
  • Paul W. Leadley
    • 1
  1. 1.Écologie, SystÉmatique et Évolution, UMR 8079 Bât. 362Université Paris-Sud XIOrsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Biogéochimie et Ecologie des Milieux ContinentauxEcole Normale SupérieureParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations