Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 284, Issue 1–2, pp 363–373 | Cite as

Rice can acclimate to lethal level of salinity by pretreatment with sublethal level of salinity through osmotic adjustment

  • M. Djanaguiraman
  • J. Annie Sheeba
  • Arun K. Shanker
  • D. Durga Devi
  • U. Bangarusamy
Research Article

Abstract

The physiological ability to adapt for various environmental changes is known as acclimation. When exposed to sublethal level of stress, plants develop the ability to withstand severe stress, as acquired tolerance. The present study was conducted to explicate the physiological basis of acquired tolerance in rice. Rice seedlings (variety IR 20) were grown in half strength Hoagland solution, and after 22nd day, they were kept in half strength Hoagland solution containing 50 mM NaCl (sublethal dose) for 7 days followed by half strength Hoagland solution containing 100 mM NaCl (lethal dose) for another 7 days. The non-pretreated 29 days old rice seedlings maintained in half strength Hoagland solution were directly transferred to half strength Hoagland solution containing 100 mM NaCl (lethal dose) solution for 7 days. The control plants were maintained in half strength Hoagland solution without NaCl. Various morphological and physiological parameters were recorded on 29th and 36th days old seedlings from control, pretreated and non-pretreated plants. The results revealed significant reduction in growth parameters (shoot length, root length, leaf area and total dry matter production) of non-pretreated plants below that of pretreated plants. The pretreated plants showed increased values to the extreme of 19.8 per cent in leaf water potential (ψw), 9 per cent in relative water content (RWC), 26 per cent in photosynthetic rate (P N), 28 per cent in leaf stomatal conductance, and 47 per cent in chlorophyll a over non-pretreated plants. The same trend was also observed in chlorophyll a/b ratio (6.6%) and F v/F m ratio (19.3%). However, a reverse trend was seen in F o value. The pretreated plants showed improved ionic regulation as evident from low Na+, Cl and high K+ contents, which is attributed to enhanced plant water status and photosynthesis. Both pretreated and non-pretreated plants had higher contents of osmolytes viz., sucrose, leaf soluble sugars and proline contents than control plants. However, starch content revealed an inverse trend. Therefore, the present study reveals that rice can acclimate to lethal dose of salinity stress by pretreatment with sublethal dose of NaCl.

Keywords

Salinity Pretreatment Acclimation Sublethal level Lethal level Ions Osmotic adjustment 

Abbreviations

RWC

relative water content

Fo

baselevel fluorescence

Fv/Fm

variable to maximum fluorescence ratio

PN

photosynthetic rate

Ψw

leaf water potential

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amzallag, GN, Seligmann, H, Lerner, HR 1993A developmental window for salt adaptation in Sorghum bicolor J Exp Bot44645652Google Scholar
  2. Amzallag, N, Lerner, HR, Poljakoff Mayber, A 1990Induction of increased salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor by NaCl pretreatmentJ Exp Bot412934Google Scholar
  3. Bates, LS, Waldreu, RP, Teak, TD 1973Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studiesPlant Soil39205207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayuelo-Jimenez, JS, Debouck, DG, Lynch, JP 2003Growth, gas exchange, water relations and ion composition of Phaseolus species grown under saline conditionsField Crops Res80207222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boursier, P, Lauchli, A 1990Growth responses and mineral nutrient relations of salt stressed sorghumCrop Sci3012261233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brugnoli, E, Lauteri, M 1991Effects of salinity on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity and carbon isotope discrimination of salt-tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 non-halophytesPlant Physiol95628635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, JJ 2001Identification of genetic diversity and mutations in higher plant acquired thermotolerancePhysiol Plant112167170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cachorro, P, Martinez, R, Ortiz, A, Cerda, A 1995Abscisic acid and osmotic relations in Phaseolus vulgaris L. shoots under salt stressJ Plant Growth Res1499104Google Scholar
  9. Cachorro, P, Ortiz, A, Cerda, A 1993Growth, water relations, and solute composition of Phaseolus vulgaris L. under saline conditionsPlant Sci952932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardini, CE, Leloir, LF, Chiriboga, J 1955The biosynthesis of sucroseJ Biol Chem214149155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu, TM, Aspinall, D, Paleg, LG 1976Stress metabolism: 7. Salinity and proline accumulation in barleyAust J Plant Physiol3219228Google Scholar
  12. Colmer, TD, Fan, TWM, Higashi, RM, Lauchli, A 1996Interaction of Ca2+ and NaCl salinity on the ionic relations and proline accumulation in the primary root tip of Sorghum bicolor Physiol Plant97421424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Djanaguiraman, M, Ramadass, R 2004Effect of salinity on chlorophyll content of rice genotypesAgric Sci Digest24178181Google Scholar
  14. Djanaguiraman, M, Ramadass, R, Senthil, A, Durga Devi, M 2003Effect of salinity induction on yield and yield components in rice cultivarsJ Agri Resour Manage217Google Scholar
  15. Fang, Z, Bouwkamp, JC, Solomos, T 1998Chlorophyllase activities and chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence in non-yellowing mutant and wild type of Phaseolus vulgaris LJ Exp Bot49503510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flowers, TJ, Troke, PF, Yeo, AR 1977The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytesAm Rev Pl Phy Soil2889121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grover, A, Kapoor, A, Satya, O, Sangeeta, L, Sahi, AC, Agarwal, SK, Agarwal, M, Dubey, H 2001Understanding molecular alphabets of the plant abiotic stress responseCurr Sci80 206216Google Scholar
  18. Handa, S, Handa, AK, Hasegawa, PM, Bressan, RA 1986Proline accumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to salinity stressPlant Physiol80938945PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedge JE, Hofreiter BT (1962) Carbohydrates chemistry. In: Whistler RL, Be Miller JB (eds) 17, Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayaprakash, TL, Ramamohan, G, Krishna Prasad, BT, Ganesh Kumar, , Prasad, TG, Mathew, MK, Udaya Kumar, M 1998Genotypic variability in differential expression of Lea 2 and Lea 3 genes and proteins in response to salinity stress in finger millet (Eleusine coroacona Gaertn.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlingsAnn Bot82513522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kafi, M, Stewart, WS, Borland, AM 2003Carbohydrate and proline contents in leaves, roots and apices of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive wheat cultivarsRuss J Plant Physiol50155162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kishor, KPB, Hong, Z, Miao, GH, Hu, CAA, Verma, DPS 1995Overexpression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmoltolerance in transgenic plantsPlant Physiol10813871394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar, G, Krishnaprasad, BT, Savitha, M, Gopalakrishna, R, Mukhopadhyay, K, Ramamohan, G, Udayakumar, M 1999Enhanced expression of heat shock protein in thermotolerant lines of sunflower and their progenies selected on the basis of temperature induction response (TIR)Theor Appl Genet99359367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kush, GS 1997Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of ricePlant Mol Biol352534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang, Z, Zhang, F, Shao, M, Zhang, J 2002The relations of stomatal conductance, water consumption, growth rate to leaf water potential during soil drying and rewatering cycle of wheat (Triticum aestivum)Bot Bull Acad Sin43187192Google Scholar
  26. Liu, T, Staden, J 2001Partitioning of carbohydrates in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant soybean callus cultures under salinity stress and its subsequent reliefPlant Growth Regul331317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu, C, Zhang, J 1998Modifications in photosystem II photochemistry in senescent leaves of maize plantsJ Exp Bot4916711679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutts, S, Kinet, JM, Bouharmont, J 1996NaCl induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salt resistanceAnn Bot78389398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maxwell, K, Johnson, GN 2000Chlorophyll fluorescence, a practical guideJ Exp Bot51659668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miron, D, Schaffer, AA 1991Sucrose phosphate synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activities in developing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and the sucrose accumulating Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and BonplPlant Physiol95623627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morris, DA, Arthur, ED 1984Invertase activity in sinks undergoing cell expansionPlant Growth Regul2327337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Munns, R 1993Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypothesisPlant Cell Environ1611071114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muranaka, S, Shimizu, K, Kato, M 2002A salt-tolerant cultivar of wheat maintains photosynthetic activity by suppressing sodium uptakePhotosynthetica40509515Google Scholar
  34. Muscolo Sidari, A M, Panuccio, MR 2003Tolerance of kikuyu grass to long term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defencesPlant Growth Regul415762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reddy, MP, Vora, AB 1985Effect of salinity on protein metabolism in bajra leavesIndian J Plant Physiol28190195Google Scholar
  36. Ross, CW 1984Plant Physiology Laboratory ManualWordsworth Publishing CompanyBelmontGoogle Scholar
  37. Sacher, RF, Staples, RC 1985Inositol and sugars in adaptation of tomato to saltPlant Physiol77206210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Santos, V, Campos, A, Azevedo, H, Caldeira, G 2001In situ and in vitro senescence induced by KCl stress : nutritional imbalance, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant metabolismJ Exp Bot52351360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Senthil-Kumar, M, Srikanthbabu, V, Mohan Raju, B, Ganesh Kumar, , Shivaprakash, N, Udayakumar, M 2003Screening of inbred lines to develop a thermotolerant sunflower hybrid using the temperature induction response (TIR) technique: a novel approach by exploiting residual variabilityJ Exp Bot5425692578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh, AK, Chakravarthy, D, Singh, TPK, Singh, HN 1996Evidence for a role for L-proline as a salinity protectant in the Cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum Plant Cell Environ19490494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Srikanthbabu, V, Ganesh Kumar, , Krishnaprasad, BT, Gopalakrishna, R, Savitha, M, Udayakumar, M 2002Identification of pea genotypes with enhanced thermotolerance using temperature induction response (TIR) techniqueJ Plant Physiol159535545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toenissen GH (1995) The Rockefeller Foundation’s International Program on Rice Biotechnology. In: Altman DW, Watanabe KN (eds) Plant biotechnology in developing countries, R G Landes Company, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  43. Turner, NC 1988Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber techniqueIrrigation Sci9289308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uma, S, Prasad, TG, Udaya Kumar, M 1995Genetic variability in recovery growth and synthesis of stress proteins in response to polyethylene glycol and salt stress in finger milletAnn Bot764349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Umezawa Shimizu, T K, Kato, M, Ueda, T 2000Enhancement of salt tolerance in soybean with NaCl pretreatmentPhysiol Plant1105963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weatherly, PE 1950Studies in water relations of cotton plants I, The field measurement of water deficit in leavesNew Phytol498187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilkinson L, Hill M, Welna JP, Birkenbevel BK (1996) Systat for windows, Version 6 (ed) SPSS Inc., Evanston, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeo, AR, Flowers, TJ 1986Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soilsAust J Plant Physiol13161173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeo, AR, Caporon, SP, Flores, TJ 1985The effect of salinity upon photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa): gas exchange by individual leaves in relation to their salt contentJ Exp Bot3612401248Google Scholar
  50. Yoshida S, Farno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA (1971) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Int Rice Res Newslett, p 70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Djanaguiraman
    • 1
  • J. Annie Sheeba
    • 1
  • Arun K. Shanker
    • 1
  • D. Durga Devi
    • 1
  • U. Bangarusamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop PhysiologyTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations