Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 282, Issue 1–2, pp 343–360 | Cite as

Evaluation of the PNM Model for Simulating Drain Flow Nitrate-N Concentration Under Manure-Fertilized Maize

  • Jean. M. Sogbedji
  • Harold. M. van  Es
  • Jeff J. Melkonian
  • Robert R. Schindelbeck
Article

Abstract

Mathematical models may be used to develop management strategies that optimize the use of nutrients from complex sources such as manure in agriculture. The Precision Nitrogen Management (PNM) model is based on the LEACHN model and a maize N uptake/growth and yield model and focuses on developing more precise N management recommendations. The PNM model was evaluated for simulating drain flow nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) in a 3-yr study involving different times of liquid manure application on two soil textural extremes, a clay loam and a loamy sand under maize (Zea mays, L.) production. The model was calibrated for major N transformation rate constants including mineralization, nitrification and denitrification, and its performance was tested using two different calibration scenarios with increasing levels of generalization: (i) separate sets of rate constants for each individual soil type and (ii) a single set of rate constants for both soil types. When calibrated for each manure application treatment for each soil type, the model provided good simulations of monthly and seasonal drain flow NO3-N concentrations. The correlation coefficient (r) and Willmott’s index of agreement (d) ranged from 0.63 to 0.96 and 0.72 to 0.92, respectively. The calibrated model performed reasonably well when rate constant values averaged over manure application treatment for each soil type were used, with r and d values between 0.54 and 0.97, and 0.70 and 0.94, respectively, and greater accuracy for the clay loam soil. When rate constant values were averaged over manure application treatments and soil types, model performance was reasonably accurate for the fall time manure application on the clay loam (r and d of 0.60 and 0.91 and 0.72 and 0.92, respectively) and satisfactory for the spring time on the clay loam and the fall and spring times for the loamy sand soil (r and d between 0.56 and 0.90 and 0.58 and 0.84, respectively). The use of the model for predicting N dynamics under manure-fertilized maize cropping appears promising.

Keywords

maize manure nitrogen modeling PNM soil type 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addiscott, T M, Whitmore, A P 1987Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter, and springJ. Agri. Sci. Camb.109 141157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, L R, Rojas, K W, Hanson, J D, Shaffer, M J, Ma, L 2000Root Zone Water Quality Model: Modeling Management Effects on Water Quality and Crop ProductionWater Resources Publications, LLCHighlands Ranch, CO, USA372Google Scholar
  3. Ball-Coelho, B R, Roy, R C, Bruin, A J 2004Nitrate leaching as affected by liquide swine manure and cover cropping in sandy soil of southern OntarioCan. J. Soil Sci.2187197Google Scholar
  4. Barbarika, A,Jr, Sikora, L J, Colacicco, D 1985Factors affecting the mineralization of nitrogen in sewage sludge applied to soilsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.4914031406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beraud, J, Fine, P, Yermiyahu, U, Keinan, M, Rosenberg, R, Hadas, A, Bar-Tal, A 2005Modeling carbone and nitrogen transformations for adjustment of compost application with nitrogen uptake by wheatJ. Environ. Qual.34664675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernal, M P, Kirchmann, H 1992Carbon and nitrogen mineralization and ammonia volatilization from fresh, aerobically and anerobically treated pig manure during incubation with soilBiol. Fertil. Soils.13135141Google Scholar
  7. Borg, G Ch, Jansson, P E, Linden, B 1990Simulated and measured nitrogen conditions in a manured and fertilized soilPlant Soil121251267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, G 1974A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention dataSoil Sci.117311314Google Scholar
  9. Cornell Cooperative Extension 1997 Cornell Recommendations for Integrated Field Crop Management. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornell Nutrient Analysis Laboratories 1987 Phosphorus and nitrate calorimetric determinations by autoanalyzer. In Methods for Soil Fertility Analysis. Eds. M C McCenahan and G A Ferguson. pp. 7–16. Procedure No s1101. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornell Nutrient Analysis Laboratories 1989 Extraction of soil for “available” nutrients. In Methods for Soil Fertility Analysis. Eds. M C McCenahan and G A Ferguson. pp. 3–6. Procedure No s1100. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Desmond, E D, Ward, A D 2000ADAPT: Agricultural Drainage and Pesticide Transport model. User manual. Version 5.1Department of Agricultural Engineering, Ohio State UniversityColumbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  13. Donnigan A S Jr 1983 Model predictions vs. field observations: the model validation/testing process. In Fate of Chemicals in the Environment. A. S. C. Symposium series 225. Eds. R I Swnn and A Schenronder. pp. 151–171. Am Chem. Soc., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, B F, Magdoff, F R 1991An evaluation of nitrogen mineralization indices for organic residuesJ. Environ. Qual.20368372Google Scholar
  15. Durieux, R P, Brown, H J, Stewart, E J, Zhao, J Q, Jokela, W E, Magdoff, F R 1995Implications of nitrogen management strategies for nitrate leaching potential-roles of nitrogen-source and fertilizer recommendation systemAgron. J.87884887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eghball, B 2000Nitrogen mineralization from field-applied beef cattle feedlot manure or compostSoil Sci. Soc. Am J.6420242030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gee, G H, Bauder, J W 1986Particle size analysisKlute, A eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Agron Monogr 92ASA and SSSAMadison, WI383411Google Scholar
  18. Gangbazo, G, Pesant, A R, Couillard, C D, Barnett, G M 1995Winter and early spring losses of nitrogen following late fall application of hog manureCan. Agric. Eng.377379Google Scholar
  19. Grant, R F, Amrani, M, Heaney, D J, Wright, R, Zhang, M 2004Mathematical modeling of phosphorus losses from land application of hog and cattle manureJ. Environ. Qual.33210231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta, S, Munyankusi, E, Moncrief, J, Zvomuya, F, Hanewall, M 2004Tillage and manure application effects on mineral nitrogen leaching from seasonally frozen soilsJ. Environ. Qual.3312381246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadas, A, Molina, J A E 1993Simulation of nitrogen assimilation by hetrotrophic soil microbial biomassPhysiol. Plant.89664668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadas, A, Portnoy, R 1997Rate of decomposition in soil and release of available nitrogen from cattle manure and municipal waste compostsCompost Sci. Util.54854Google Scholar
  23. Hadas, A, Kautsky, L, Goek, M, Kara, E E 2004Rates of decomposition of plant residues and available nitrogen in soil, related to residue composition through simulation of carbon and nitrogen turnoverSoil Biol. Biochem.36255266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanks, J, Ritchie, J T 1991Modeling Plant and Soil SystemsAmerican Society of Agronomy, IncMadison, WI, USA545Google Scholar
  25. Hansen, E M, Thomsen, I K, Hansen, M N 2004Optimizing farmyard manure utilization by varying the application time and tillage strategySoil Use Manage.20173177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutson J L 2003 Leaching Estimation And Chemistry Model: A Process-Based Model of Water and Solute Movement, Transformations, Plant Uptake, and Chemical Reactions in the Unsaturated Zone. Version 4. Dept. of crop and Soil Sciences. Research series No. R03–1. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutson, J L, Wagenet, R J 1991Simulating nitrogen dynamics in soils using a deterministic modelSoil Use Manage.77478Google Scholar
  28. Hutson J L and Wagenet R J 1992 LEACHM: Leaching Estimation And Chemistry Model: A Process-Based Model of Water and Solute Movement, Transformations, Plant Uptake, and Chemical Reactions in the Unsaturated Zone. Continuum Vol. 2, Version 3. Water Resources Inst., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  29. Jabro, J D, Lotse, J D, Fritton, D D, Baker, D E 1994Estimation of preferential movement of bromide tracer under field conditionsJ. Hydrol.1566171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, D R, Smith, K A 1997Animal manure slurries as a source of nitrogen for cereals; effect of application time on efficiencySoil Use Manage.137581Google Scholar
  31. Jansson, P, Andersson, R 1988Simulation of runoff and nitrate leaching from an agricultural district in SwedenJ.␣Hydrol.993347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jemison J M Jr 1991 Nitrate leaching from soil measured with zero-tension pan lysimeters as influenced by nitrogen fertilizer rate and manure application: field estimates and model predictions. Ph.D. diss. Pennsylvania State Univ., Univ. ParkGoogle Scholar
  33. Jemison, J M,Jr, Jabro, J D, Fox, R H 1994aEvaluation of LEACHM: simulation of cumulative drainage, bromide leaching, and corn bromide uptakeAgron. J.86843851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jemison, J M,Jr, Jabro, J D, Fox, R H 1994bEvaluation of LEACHM: Simulation of nitrate leaching from nitrogen-fertilized and manured cornAgron. J.86852859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnsson, H, Bergström, L, Jansson, P, Paustian, K 1987Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soilAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.18333356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klausner, S D, Kanneganti, V R, Bouldin, D R 1994An approach for estimating a decay series for organic nitrogen in animal manureAgron. J.86897903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klute A and Dirksen C 1986 Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Agron Monogr 9, 2nd edition Ed. A Klute. pp. 687–734. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  38. Külling DR, Menzi H, Kröber TF, Neftel A, Sutter F, Lischer P and Kruezer M 2001 Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from different types of daily manure during storage as affected by dietary protein content. Journal of Agricultural Science 137, 235–250Google Scholar
  39. Lauer, D A, Bouldin, D R, Klausner, S D 1976Ammonia volatilization from dairy manure spread on the soil surfaceJ. Environ. Qual.5134141Google Scholar
  40. Loague, K, Green, R E 1991Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and applicationJ. Contam. Hydrol.75173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lotse, E G, Jabro, J D, Simmons, K E, Baker, D E 1992Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and leaching from arable soilsJ. Contam. Hydrol.10183196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ma L and Shaffer M J 2001. A review of carbon and nitrogen processes in nine U.S. soil nitrogen dynamic models. In Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management. Eds. M J Shaffer, L Ma and S Hansen. 631 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Magdoff, F R 1978Influence of manure application rates and continuous corn on soil NAgron. J.70629632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magdoff, F R 1991Understanding the Magdoff pre-sidedress nitrate soil test for cornJ. Prod. Agric.4297305Google Scholar
  45. Marchetti, R, Ponzini, G, Spallacci, P 2004Simulating nitrogen dynamics in agricultural soils fertilized with pig slurry and ureaJ. Environ. Qual.3312171229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Melkonian J J, van Es H M and Joseph L, 2005 Precision Nitrogen Model: Simulation of Nitrogen and Water Fluxes in the Soil–Crop–Atmosphere Continuum in Maize (Zea mays L.) Production Systems. Version 1.0. Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences. Research series No. R05–2. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  47. Molina, J A E, Clapp, C E., Hadas, A 1990Computer simulation of nitrogen turnover in soil and priming effectSoil Biol. Biochem.22349353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muchow, R C, Sinclair, T R 1991Water deficit on maize yields modeled under current and “greenhouse” climatesAgron. J.8310521059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muchow, R C, Sinclair, T R, Bernnett, J M 1990Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locationsAgron. J.82338343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mueller D K, Hamilton P A, Helsel D R, Hitt K J and Ruddy B C 1995 Nutrients in ground water and surface water of the United States – An analysis of data through 1992. Water-Resource Investigations Report 95-4031. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  51. Paul, J W, Zebarth, B J 1997Denitrification and nitrate leaching during the fall and winter following dairy cattle slurry applicationCan. J. Soil Sci.77231240Google Scholar
  52. Pratt, P F, Broodbent, F E, Martin, J P 1973Using organic wastes as nitrogen fertilizersCalif. Agric.271013Google Scholar
  53. SAS Institute 2004 SAS User’s Guide. SAS Inst, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaffer, M J, Halvorson, A D, Pierce, F J,  et al. 1991Nitrate leaching and economic analysis package (NLEAP): model description and applicationFollett, R F eds. Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm ProfitabilitySoil Science Society of America, IncMadison, WI, USA285322Google Scholar
  55. Sinclair, T R, Amir, J 1992A model to assess nitrogen limitations on the growth and yield of spring wheatField Crops Res.306378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinclair, T R, Muchow, R C 1995Effect of nitrogen supply on maize yield: I. modeling physiological responsesAgron. J.87632641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, K A, Chambers, B J 1993Utilizing the nitrogen-content of organic manures on farms-problems and practical solutionsSoil Use Manage.9105112Google Scholar
  58. Sogbedji, J M, Es, H M, Yang, C L, Geohring, L D, Magdoff, F R 2000Nitrate leaching and N budget as affected by maize N fertilizer rate and soil typeJ. Environ. Qual.2918131820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sogbedji, J M, Es, H M, Hutson, J L 2001aN fate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: calibration of the LEACHMN modelPlant and Soil2295770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sogbedji, J M, Es, H M, Hutson, J L, Geohring, L D 2001bN rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenariosPlant Soil2297182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sogbedji J M, van Es H M and Agbeko K L 2005 Modeling nitrogen dynamic under maize on ferralsols in Western Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. (in press) Google Scholar
  62. Sorensen, P, Weisbjerg, M R, Lund, P 2003Dietary effects on the composition and plant utilization of nitrogen in dairy cattle manureJ. Agricult. Sci.1417991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Alphen, B J, Stoorvogel, J J 2000A methodology for precision nitrogen fertilization in high-input farming systemsPrecis. Agr.2319332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Beek, C L, Eerwegh, G A P H, Schaik, F H, Velthof, G L, Oenema, O 2004The contribution of dairy farming on peat soil to N and P loading of surface waterNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.18595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Es H M, Steenhuis T S, Geohring L D, Vermeulen J and Boll J 1991 Movement of surface-applied and soil-embodied chemicals to drainage lines in a well-structyred soil. In Preferential Flow. Eds.T J Gish and A Shirmohammadi. pp. 59–67. ASAE, StGoogle Scholar
  66. Es, H M, Es, C L 1993Spatial nature of randomization and its effect on the outcome of field experimentsAgron. J.85420428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Es, H M, Schindelbeck, R R, Jokela, W E 2004Effect of manure application timing, crop, and soil type on phosphorus leachingJ. Environ. Qual.3310701080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. van Es H M, Yang C L and Geohring L D 2005 Maize nitrogen response as affected by drainage variability and soil type. Precision Agriculture (in press) Google Scholar
  69. Keulen, H 1976Evaluation of modelsArnold, G WWit, C T eds. Critical Evaluation of Systems Analysis in Ecosystem Research and ManagementCenter for Agriculture Publishing and Documentation (PUDOC)Wageningen, Netherlands2229Google Scholar
  70. Williams, J R 1995The EPIC modelSingh, V P eds. Computer Models of Watershed HydrologyWater Resources PublicationsHighlands Ranch, CO, USA9091000Google Scholar
  71. Willmott, C J 1981On the validation of modelsPhys. Geogr.2184194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean. M. Sogbedji
    • 1
  • Harold. M. van  Es
    • 2
  • Jeff J. Melkonian
    • 2
  • Robert R. Schindelbeck
    • 2
  1. 1.Université de Lomé, Ecole Supériéure d’AgronomieLoméTogo
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations