Plant and Soil

, Volume 267, Issue 1–2, pp 343–355 | Cite as

Rhizospheric exudation of Eriophorum vaginatum L. — Potential link to methanogenesis

  • S. Saarnio
  • L. Wittenmayer
  • W. Merbach


Root exudates are a direct link between primary production in higher plants and methanogenesis. The relationship has been widely studied on rice paddies, but less is known about its role in wetlands populated by naturally occurring species. This study provides information about the amount and composition of root exudates produced by a widespread mire plant, Eriophorum vaginatum L. For this purpose, E. vaginatum plants were grown in quartz sand in pots from April to October, and root exudates were collected once a month by percolation of the cultivation substrate. In June and October, a set of plants was labelled with 14CO2 for two days and subsequently harvested for the determination of dry weight and for root exudates collected by the dipping method. The study supports earlier findings that natural wetland plants can enhance methanogenesis in their rhizosphere via active and seasonally varying exudation, but that the amount of exuded carbon (C) is many times lower than that delivered via litter formation. At both harvests in June and October, the proportion of incorporated radioactivity in shoots, roots and exudates was 92–96%, 4–8%, and 0.2%, respectively. New C was primarily fixed in the metabolically important carbohydrates, as well as acid anions that composed the main compounds of the new exudates. However, microbes seemed to rapidly metabolise the exudates into other substances like acetate. This was the dominant compound in the rhizoplane and rhizosphere, and it was the only detected substance that occurred in higher amounts outside the roots than inside them. Further studies in the field, including the quantification of gaseous end products, are necessary to complete our understanding of the carbon cycling in E. vaginatum-soil-microbe-system.

Key words

14C labelling carbohydrates carbon allocation Eriophorum vaginatum organic acids 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apel P 1966 Herstellung CO2-haltiger Gasgemische für die Photosynthesemessung. Flora A 157, 330–333. (Generation of CO2-containing gas mixtures for their use in photosynthesis measurements, in German).Google Scholar
  2. Aulakh MS, Wassmann R, Bueno C, Kreuzwieser J and Rennenberg H 2001a Characterization of root exudates at different growth stages of ten rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Plant Biol. 3, 139–148.Google Scholar
  3. Aulakh M S, Wassmann R, Bueno C and Rennenberg H 2001b Impact of root exudates of different cultivars and plant development stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.) on methane production in a paddy soil. Plant Soil 230, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin F S III, Moilanen L and Kielland K 1993 Preferential use of organic nitrogen for growth by a non-mycorrhizal arctic sedge. Nature 361, 150–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin F S III, Van Cleve K and Chapin M C 1979 Soil temperature and nutrient cycling in the tussock growth form of Eriophorum vaginatum. J. Ecol. 67, 169–189.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen T R, Panikov N, Mastepanov M, Joabsson A, Stewart A, Öquist M, Sommerkorn M, Reynaud S and Svensson B 2003 Biotic controls on CO2 and CH4 exchange in wetlands — A closed environment study. Biogeochemistry 64, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clymo R S 1984 The limits to peat bog growth. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B303, 605–654.Google Scholar
  8. Dannenberg S and Conrad R 1999 Effect of rice plants on methane production and rhizospheric metabolism in paddy soil. Biogeochemistry 45, 53–71.Google Scholar
  9. De Nobili M, Contin M, Mondini C and Brookes P C 2001 Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1163–1170.Google Scholar
  10. Duddleston K N, Kinney M A, Kiene R P and Hines M E 2002 Anaerobic microbial biogeochemistry in a northern bog: acetate as a dominant metabolic end product. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 1063, doi:10.1029/2001GB001402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frenzel P and Rudolph J 1998 Methane emission from a wetland plant: the role of CH4 oxidation in Eriophorum. Plant Soil 202, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galand P E, Saarnio S, Fritze H and Yrjälä K 2002 Depth related diversity of methanogen Archaea in Finnish oligotrophic fen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 42, 441–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gransee A and Wittenmayer L 2000 Qualitative and quantitative analysis of water-soluble root exudates in relation to plant species and development. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 163, 381–385.Google Scholar
  14. Grayston S J, Vaughan D and Jones D 1996 Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impacts on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl. Soil Ecol. 5, 29–56.Google Scholar
  15. Greenup A L, Bradford M A, McNamara N P, Ineson P and Lee J A. 2000 The role of Eriophorum vaginatum in CH4 flux from an ombrotrophic peatland. Plant Soil 227, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hertenberger G, Zampach P and Bachmann G 2002 Plant species affect the concentration of free sugars and free amino acids in different types of soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 165, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R and Seiler W 1986 Effects of vegetation on the emission of methane from submerged paddy soil. Plant Soil 92, 223–233.Google Scholar
  18. Jalas J 1958 Suuri kasvikirja I.Otava, Keuruu, Finland. pp. 546–548 (‘Finnish Flora’, in Finnish).Google Scholar
  19. Johnson J F, Allan D L, Vance C P and Weiblen G 1996 Root carbon dioxide fixation by phosphorus-deficient Lupinus albus. Contribution to organic acid exudation by proteoid roots. Plant Physiol. 112, 19–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones D L 1998 Organic acids in the rhizosphere — A critical review. Plant Soil 205, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones D L, Prabowo A M and Kochian L V 1996 Kinetics of malate transport and decomposition in acid soils and isolated bacterial populations: The effect of microorganisms on root exudation of malate under Al stress. Plant Soil 182, 239–247.Google Scholar
  22. King J Y and Reeburgh W S 2002 A pulse-labeling experiment to determine the contribution of recent plant photosynthates to net methane emission in arctic wet sedge tundra. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 173–180.Google Scholar
  23. Lu Y, Wassmann R, Neue H U, Huang C and Bueno C S 2000 Methanogenic responses to exogenous substrates in anaerobic rice soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1683–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu Y, Watanabe A and Kimura M 2002 Contribution of plant-derived carbon to soil microbial biomass dynamics in a paddy rice microcosm. Biol. Fertil. Soils 36, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumoto H, Okada K and Takahashi E 1979 Excretion products of maize roots from seedling to seed development stage. Plant Soil 53, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meharg A A 1994 A critical review of labelling techniques used to quantify rhizosphere carbon-flow. Plant Soil 166, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Megonigal J P, Whalen S C, Tissue D T, Bovard B D, Albert D B and Allen A S 1999 A plant-soil-atmosphere microcosm for tracing radiocarbon from photosynthesis through methanogenesis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merbach W, Mirus E, Knof G, Remus R, Ruppel S, Russow R, Gransee A and Schulze J 1999 Release of carbon and nitrogen compounds by plant roots and their possible ecological importance. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 162, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell E A D, Buttler A, Grosvernier P, Rydin H, Albinsson C, Greenup A L, Heijmans M M P D, Hoosbeek M R and Saarinen T 2000 Relationships among testate amoebae (Protozoa), vegetation and water chemistry in five Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in Europe. New Phytol. 145, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moorhead D L, Kroehler C J, Linkins A E and Reynolds J F 1993 Extracellular acid phophatase activities in Eriophorum vaginatum tussocks: A modeling synthesis. Arct. Alp. Res. 25, 50–55.Google Scholar
  31. Neumann G and Römheld V 2001 The release of root exudates as affected by the plant’s physiological status. In The Rhizosphere: Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface. (Eds) R Pinton, Z Varanini and P Nannipieri. pp. 44–93. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel.Google Scholar
  32. Popp T J, Chanton J P, Whiting G J and Grant N 1999 Methane stable isotope distribution at a Carex dominated fen in north central Alberta. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 1063–1077.Google Scholar
  33. Richert M, Saarnio S, Juutinen S, Silvola J, Augustin J and Merbach W 2000 Distribution of assimilated carbon in the system Phragmites australis — waterlogged peat soil after 14C pulse labelling. Biol. Fertil. Soils 32, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saarnio S, Alm J, Martikainen P J and Silvola J 1998 Effects of raised CO2 on potential CH4 production and oxidation in, and CH4 emission from, a boreal peat. J. Ecol. 86, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saarnio S, Alm J, Silvola J, Lohila A, Nykänen H and Martikainen P J 1997 Seasonal variation in CH4 emissions and production and oxidation potentials at microsites on an oligotrophic pine fen. Oecologia 110, 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saarnio S and Silvola J 1999 Effects of increased CO2 and N on CH4 efflux from a boreal mire: a growth chamber experiment. Oecologia 119, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schumann F, Merbach W, Freye E and Schilling G 1988 Ein offenes Gaswechselsystem zur gleichzeitigen Ermittlung der apparenten CO2-Assimilation mittels URAS und des 14C-Einbaus in die Pflanze. Arch. Acker-Pfl. Boden. 32, 41–48. (An open gas exchange system for simultaneous determination of the apparent CO2 assimilation by means of infra-red technique and 14C incorporation into plants, in German).Google Scholar
  38. Sigren L K, Byrd G T, Fisher F M and Sass R L 1997 Comparison of soil acetate concentrations and methane production, transport, and emission in two rice cultivars. Global Biogeochem. Cycle. 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
  39. Smith G S, Johnston C M and Cornforth I S 1983 Comparison of nutrient solutions for growth of plants in sand culture. New Phytol. 94, 537–548.Google Scholar
  40. Ström L, Ekberg A, Mastepanov M and Christensen T R 2003 The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland. Global Change Biol. 9, 1185–1192.Google Scholar
  41. Svensson B H 1984 Different temperature optima for methane formation when enrichments from acid peat are supplemented with acetate or hydrogen. Appl. Environ. Microb. 48, 389–394.Google Scholar
  42. Vančura V 1988 Plant metabolites in soil. In Soil Microbial Associations: Control of Structures and Functions. Developments in agricultural and managed-forest ecology 17. (Eds) V Vančura and F Kunc. pp. 57–144. Academia and Elsevier, Prague.Google Scholar
  43. Vogels G D, Keltjens J T and Van der Drift C 1988 Biochemistry of methane production. In Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. (Ed.) A J B Zehnder. pp. 707–770. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  44. Wang B and Adachi K 2000 Differences among rice cultivars in root exudation, methane oxidation, and populations of methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria in relation to methane emission. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 58, 349–356.Google Scholar
  45. Wein R W 1973 Biological flora of the British Isles. Eriophorum vaginatum L. J. Ecol. 61, 601–615.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biologian laitos, Joensuun yliopistoJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.Institut für Bodenkunde und Pflanzenernährung, Professur Physiologie und Ernährung der PflanzenMartin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations