Abstract
Key message
The homologous genes to OsSUT1-5 in wheat were identified and detailed analysed. TaSUT1 was the predominant sucrose transporter group and it illustrated the genotypic variations towards drought during grain filling.
Abstract
Sucrose transporters (SUT) play crucial roles in wheat stem water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) remobilization to grain. To determine the major functional SUT gene groups in shoot parts of wheat during grain development, drought tolerant varieties, Westonia and Kauz, were investigated in field drought experiments. Fourteen homologous genes to OsSUT1-5 were identified on five homeologous groups, namely TaSUT1_4A, TaSUT1_4B, TaSUT1_4D; TaSUT2_5A, TaSUT2_5B, TaSUT2_5D; TaSUT3_1A, TaSUT3_1D; TaSUT4_6A, TaSUT4_6B, TaSUT4_6D; TaSUT5_2A, TaSUT5_2B, and TaSUT5_2D, and their gene structures were analysed. Wheat plants above the ground were harvested from pre-anthesis to grain maturity and the stem, leaf sheath, rachis, lemma and developing grain were used for analysing TaSUT gene expression. Grain weight, thousand grain weight, kernel number per spike, biomass and stem WSC were characterized. The study showed that among the five TaSUT groups, TaSUT1 was the predominant sucrose transporting group in all organs sampled, and the expression was particularly high in the developing grain. In contrast to TaSUT1, the gene expression levels of TaSUT2, TaSUT3 and TaSUT4 were lower, except for TaSUT3 which showed preferential expression in the lemma before anthesis. The TaSUT5 gene group was very weakly expressed in all tissues. The upregulated gene expression of TaSUT1 Westonia type in stem and grain reveal a crucial role in stem WSC remobilization to grain under drought. The high TaSUT1 gene expression and the significant correlations with thousand grain weight (TGW) and kernel number per spike demonstrated the contribution in Kauz’s high grain yield in an irrigated environment and high TGW in Westonia under drought stress. Further molecular level identification is required for gene marker development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 1-FEH:
-
1-Fructan exohydrolase
- ABA:
-
Abscisic acid
- DAA:
-
Days after anthesis
- GAPDH:
-
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- KN:
-
Kernel number per spike
- SUT:
-
Sucrose transporters
- TGW:
-
Thousand grain weight
- WSC:
-
Water soluble carbohydrate
References
Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11:R106. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
Aoki N, Hirose T, Takahashi S, Ono K, Ishimaru K, Ohsugi R (1999) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a gene for a sucrose transporter in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Physiol 40:1072–1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029489
Aoki N, Whitfield P, Hoeren F, Scofield G, Newell K, Patrick J, Offler C, Clarke B, Rahman S, Furbank RT (2002) Three sucrose transporter genes are expressed in the developing seed of hexaploid wheat. Plant Mol Biol 50:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019846832163
Aoki N, Hirose T, Scofield GN, Whitfeld PR, Furbank RT (2003) The sucrose transporter gene family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 44:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcg030
Aoki N, Scofield GN, Wang XD, Patrick JW, Offler CE, Furbank RT (2004) Expression and localization analysis of the wheat sucrose transporter TaSUT1 in vegetative tissues. Planta 219:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-004-1232-7
Butler JD, Byrne PF, Mohammadi V, Chapman PL, Haley SD (2005) Agronomic performance of Rht alleles in a spring wheat population across a range of moisture levels. Crop Sci 45:939–947
Deol KK, Mukherjee S, Gao F, Brule-Babel A, Stasolla C, Ayele BT (2013) Identification and characterization of the three homeologues of a new sucrose transporter in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol 13:181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-181
Eom JS, Cho JI, Reinders A, Lee SW, Yoo Y, Tuan PQ, Choi SB, Bang G, Park YI, Cho MH, Bhoo SH, An G, Hahn TR, Ward JM, Jeon JS (2011) Impaired function of the tonoplast-localized sucrose transporter in rice, OsSUT2, limits the transport of vacuolar reserve sucrose and affects plant growth. Plant Physiol 157:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.176982
Eom JS, Chen L-Q, Sosso D, Julius BT, Lin IW, Qu X-Q, Braun DM, Frommer WB (2015) SWEETs, transporters for intracellular and intercellular sugar translocation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 25:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.04.005
Fales FW (1951) The assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates by yeast cells. J Biol Chem 193:113–124
Guóth A, Tari I, Gallé Á, Csiszár J, Pécsváradi A, Cseuz L, Erdei L (2009) Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: changes in flag leaf photosynthetic activity, ABA levels, and grain yield. J Plant Growth Regul 28:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9085-8
Halford NG (2011) Sugars in crop plants. Ann Appl Biol 158:1–25
Hirose T, Imaizumi N, Scofield GN, Furbank RT, Ohsugi R (1997) cDNA cloning and tissue specific expression of a gene for sucrose transporter from rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 38:1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029134
Hirose T, Endler A, Ohsugi R (1999) Gene expression of enzymes for starch and sucrose metabolism and transport in leaf sheaths of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during the heading period in relation to the sink to source transition. Plant Prod Sci 2:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.2.178
Ibraheem O, Dealtry G, Roux S, Bradley G (2011) The effect of drought and salinity on the expressional levels of sucrose transporters in rice (‘Oryza sativa’ Nipponbare) cultivar plants. Plant Omics 4:68–74
Ishimaru K, Hirose T, Aoki N, Takahashi S, Ono K, Yamamoto S, Wu J, Saji S, Baba T, Ugaki M, Matsumoto T, Ohsugi R (2001) Antisense expression of a rice sucrose transporter OsSUT1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 42:1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce148
Kobata T, Palta J, Turner N (1992) Rate of development of postanthesis water stress and grain filling of spring wheat. Crop Sci 32:1238–1242
Leach KA, Tran TM, Slewinski TL, Meeley RB, Braun DM (2017) Sucrose transporter2 contributes to maize growth, development, and crop yield. J Integr Plant Biol 59:390–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12527
Mizuno H, Kasuga S, Kawahigashi H (2018) Root lodging is a physical stress that changes gene expression from sucrose accumulation to degradation in sorghum. BMC Plant Biol 18:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1218-9
Mukherjee S, Liu A, Deol KK, Kulichikhin K, Stasolla C, Brule-Babel A, Ayele BT (2015) Transcriptional coordination and abscisic acid mediated regulation of sucrose transport and sucrose-to-starch metabolism related genes during grain filling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci 240:143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.010
Pheloung P, Siddique K (1991) Contribution of stem dry matter to grain yield in wheat cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol 18:53–64
Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
Rosche E, Blackmore D, Tegeder M, Richardson T, Schroeder H, Higgins TJ, Frommer WB, Offler CE, Patrick JW (2002) Seed-specific overexpression of a potato sucrose transporter increases sucrose uptake and growth rates of developing pea cotyledons. Plant J 30:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01282.x
Ruan YL (2012) Signaling role of sucrose metabolism in development. Mol Plant 5:763–765. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss046
Schnyder H (1993) The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source-sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling—a review. New Phytol 123:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03731.x
Scofield GN, Hirose T, Gaudron JA, Upadhyaya NM, Ohsugi R, Furbank RT (2002) Antisense suppression of the rice sucrose transporter gene, OsSUT1, leads to impaired seed filling and germination but does not affect photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol 29:815–826. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp01204
Slewinski TL, Meeley R, Braun DM (2009) Sucrose transporter1 functions in phloem loading in maize leaves. J Exp Bot 60:881–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern335
Usha B, Bordoloi D, Parida A (2015) Diverse expression of sucrose transporter gene family in Zea mays. J Genet 94:151–154
Wang JR, Wang L, Gulden S, Rocheleau H, Balcerzak M, Hattori J, Cao W, Han F, Zheng YL, Fedak G, Ouellet T (2010) RNA profiling of fusarium head blight-resistant wheat addition lines containing the Thinopyrum elongatum chromosome 7E. Can J Plant Pathol 32:188–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661003740512
Wang L, Lu Q, Wen X, Lu C (2015) Enhanced sucrose loading improves rice yield by increasing grain size. Plant Physiol 169:2848–2862. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01170
Wang W, Zhou H, Ma B, Owiti A, Korban SS, Han Y (2016) Divergent evolutionary pattern of sugar transporter genes is associated with the difference in sugar accumulation between grasses and eudicots. Sci Rep 6:29153. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29153
Weschke W, Panitz R, Sauer N, Wang Q, Neubohn B, Weber H, Wobus U (2000) Sucrose transport into barley seeds: molecular characterization of two transporters and implications for seed development and starch accumulation. Plant J 21:455–467. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00695.x
Xin Z, Velten JP, Oliver MJ, Burke JJ (2003) High-throughput DNA extraction method suitable for PCR. Biotechniques 34:824–826
Xu Q, Chen S, Yunjuan R, Chen S, Liesche J (2018) Regulation of sucrose transporters and phloem loading in response to environmental cues. Plant Physiol 176:930–945. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01088
Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Wang W (2001) Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Physiol 127:315–323
Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 57:508–514
Zhang J, Huang S, Fosu-Nyarko J, Dell B, McNeil M, Waters I, Moolhuijzen P, Conocono E, Appels R (2008) The genome structure of the 1-FEH genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): new markers to track stem carbohydrates and grain filling QTLs in breeding. Mol Breed 22:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-008-9179-1
Zhang J, Dell B, Conocono E, Waters I, Setter T, Appels R (2009) Water deficits in wheat: fructan exohydrolase (1-FEH) mRNA expression and relationship to soluble carbohydrate concentrations in two varieties. New Phytol 181:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02713.x
Zhang J, Xu Y, Chen W, Dell B, Vergauwen R, Biddulph B, Khan N, Luo H, Appels R, Van den Ende W (2015) A wheat 1-FEH w3 variant underlies enzyme activity for stem WSC remobilization to grain under drought. New Phytol 205:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13030
Zhu G, Ye N, Yang J, Peng X, Zhang J (2011) Regulation of expression of starch synthesis genes by ethylene and ABA in relation to the development of rice inferior and superior spikelets. J Exp Bot 62:3907–3916. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err088
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Scholarship of Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research to the first author, Grain Research & Development Corporation ‘Grant Number UMU00039 and Murdoch University. The Western Australian Agriculture and Biotechnology Centre provided facilities for molecular analyses. The work involved collaboration with staff from the Department of Agricultural and Food Western Australia, Merredin station.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SA, JZ, WM, BD conceived the research. SA and JZ performed the experiments and analysed the data. SA, JZ, WM and BD wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors claim that there is no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Sheikh Ahmed, S., Zhang, J., Ma, W. et al. Contributions of TaSUTs to grain weight in wheat under drought. Plant Mol Biol 98, 333–347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0782-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0782-1