Comparative transcript analyses of the ovule, microspore, and mature pollen in Brassica napus
- 479 Downloads
Transcriptome data for plant reproductive organs/cells currently is very limited as compared to sporophytic tissues. Here, we constructed cDNA libraries and obtained ESTs for Brassica napus pollen (4,864 ESTs), microspores (i.e., early stage pollen development; 6,539 ESTs) and ovules (10,468 ESTs). Clustering and assembly of the 21,871 ESTs yielded a total of 10,782 unigenes, with 3,362 contigs and 7,420 singletons. The pollen transcriptome contained high levels of polygalacturonases and pectinesterases, which are involved in cell wall synthesis and expansion, and very few transcription factors or transcripts related to protein synthesis. The set of genes expressed in mature pollen showed little overlap with genes expressed in ovules or in microspores, suggesting in the latter case that a marked differentiation had occurred from the early microspore stages through to pollen development. Remarkably, the microspores and ovules exhibited a high number of co-expressed genes (N = 1,283) and very similar EST functional profiles, including high transcript numbers for transcriptional and translational processing genes, protein modification genes and unannotated genes. In addition, examination of expression values for genes co-expressed among microspores and ovules revealed a highly statistically significant correlation among these two tissues (R = 0.360, P = 1.2 × 10−40) as well as a lack of differentially expressed genes. Overall, the results provide new insights into the transcriptional profile of rarely studied ovules, the transcript changes during pollen development, transcriptional regulation of pollen tube growth and germination, and describe the parallels in the transcript populations of microspore and ovules which could have implications for understanding the molecular foundation of microspore totipotency in B. napus.
KeywordsPollen Microspores Ovules Transcriptome Brassica napus
This work was funded by the National Research Council of Canada Genomics and Health Initiative (CAW and JEK) and the Genome Prairie program “Enhancing Canola through Genomics” funded by Genome Canada (MRM and JEK). We appreciate the advice, discussions and materials provided by Dr. Alison Ferrie for microspore embryogenesis, the technical assistance provided by Ning Zhou, and the extensive secondary review of the unigene contigs by Tania Castillo-Pelayo. This paper is Natural Research Council of Canada publication number 50138.
- Ferrie AMR (2003) Microspore culture of Brassica species. In: Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) Doubled haploid production in crop plants, a manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 205–215Google Scholar
- Figueroa P, Gusmaroli G, Serino G, Habashi J, Ma L, Shen Y, Feng S, Bostick M, Callis J, Hellmann H, Deng XW (2005) Arabidopsis has two redundant Cullin3 proteins that are essential for embryo development and that interact with RBX1 and BTB proteins to form multisubunit E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes in vivo. Plant Cell 17:1180–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnston AJ, Meier P, Gheyselinck J, Wuest SEJ, Federer M, Schlagenhauf E, Becker JD, Grossniklaus U (2007) Genetic subtraction profiling identifies genes essential for Arabidopsis reproduction and reveals interaction between the female gametophyte and the maternal sporophyte. Genome Biol 8:R204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joosen R, Cordewener J, Supena EDJ, Vorst O, Lammers M, Maliepaard C, Zeilmaker T, Miki B, America T, Custers J, Boutilier K (2007) Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies pathways and markers associated with the establishment of rapeseed microspore-derived embryo development. Plant Physiol 144:155–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller WA, Arnison PG, Cardy BJ (1987) Haploids from gametophytic cells-recent developments and future prospects. In: Green CE, Somers DA, Hackett WP, Biesboer DD (eds) Plant tissue and cell culture. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 223–241Google Scholar
- Kondrashov AS (1998) Measuring spontaneous deleterious mutation process. Genetica 102/103:183–197Google Scholar
- Miesel L, Fonseca B, González S, Baeza-Yates R, Cambiazo V, Campos R, Gonzalez M, Orellana A, Retamales J, Silva H (2005) A rapid and efficient method for purifying high quality total RNA from peaches (Prunus persica) for functional genomics analyses. Biol Res 38:83–88Google Scholar
- Reddy AS, Day IS (2001) Analysis of the myosins encoded in the recently completed Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence. Genome Biol 2:research0024.1–0024.17Google Scholar
- Seki H, Ulker B, Jorda L, Parker J, Somssich I (2003) A highly composite gene WRKY19 may play an important role in defense signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nippon Bunshi Seibutsu Gakkai Nenkai Puroguramu, Koen Yoshishu 26:619Google Scholar
- Yanhui C, Xiaoyuan Y, Kun H, Meihua L, Jigang L, Zhaofeng G, Zhiqiang L, Yunfei Z, Xiaoxiao W, Xiaoming Q et al (2006) The MYB transcription factor superfamily of Arabidopsis: expression analysis and phylogenetic comparison with the rice MYB family. Plant Mol Biol 60:107–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar