Deoxymugineic acid increases Zn translocation in Zn-deficient rice plants
- 1k Downloads
Deoxymugineic acid (DMA) is a member of the mugineic acid family phytosiderophores (MAs), which are natural metal chelators produced by graminaceous plants. Rice secretes DMA in response to Fe deficiency to take up Fe in the form of Fe(III)–MAs complex. In contrast with barley, the roots of which secrete MAs in response to Zn deficiency, the amount of DMA secreted by rice roots was slightly decreased under conditions of low Zn supply. There was a concomitant increase in endogenous DMA in rice shoots, suggesting that DMA plays a role in the translocation of Zn within Zn-deficient rice plants. The expression of OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 was not increased in Zn-deficient roots but that of OsNAS3 was increased in Zn-deficient roots and shoots. The expression of OsNAAT1 was also increased in Zn-deficient roots and dramatically increased in shoots; correspondingly, HPLC analysis was unable to detect nicotianamine in Zn-deficient shoots. The expression of OsDMAS1 was increased in Zn-deficient shoots. Analyses using the positron-emitting tracer imaging system (PETIS) showed that Zn-deficient rice roots absorbed less 62Zn-DMA than 62Zn2+. Importantly, supply of 62Zn-DMA rather than 62Zn2+ increased the translocation of 62Zn into the leaves of Zn-deficient plants. This was especially evident in the discrimination center (DC). These results suggest that DMA in Zn-deficient rice plants has an important role in the distribution of Zn within the plant rather than in the absorption of Zn from the soil.
KeywordsDeoxymugineic acid Iron Nicotianamine Rice Transport Zinc
Mugineic acid family phytosiderophores
Positron-emitting tracer imaging system
Zinc-regulated and Iron-regulated transporter proteins
Region of interest
Zn, an essential element for plant growth, is absorbed from the rhizosphere by higher plants through specific transporters. The Zinc-regulated and Iron-regulated transporter Proteins (ZIP) have been isolated from both graminaceous (Ramesh et al. 2003; Ishimaru et al. 2005) and non-graminaceous plants (Grotz et al. 1998; Lasat et al. 2000; Moreau et al. 2002). Several ZIP transporters have been shown to be transcriptionally upregulated in Zn-deficient roots, but their contribution to the absorption of Zn from the rhizosphere into roots has not yet been demonstrated. Zn is also absorbed from the rhizosphere as complexes of Zn(II)–mugineic acid family phytosiderophores (MAs). The maize protein YS1 transports Fe(III)–MAs complexes (Curie et al. 2001), as well as other micronutrient-MAs complexes, including Zn(II)–MAs (Schaaf et al. 2004). von Wirén et al. (1996) reported that the ys1 mutant absorbed less 65Zn(II)-MAs than did the wild type, and Suzuki et al. (2006) showed that Zn-deficient barley absorbed more 62Zn(II)-DMA than 62Zn2+. These two studies also showed that free Zn2+ ions are absorbed into roots to some extent, suggesting that graminaceous plant roots absorb both Zn-DMA and Zn2+.
Graminaceous plants secrete MAs into the rhizosphere from their roots, although the amount differs among species in the order of: barley > wheat = rye > oat > maize > sorghum > rice (Takagi 1993). While the amount of MAs secreted is increased dramatically by Fe deficiency, it is not clear if Zn deficiency increases the secretion of MAs. Zn deficiency has been reported to increase (Cakmak et al. 1994; Walter et al. 1994; Zhang et al. 1989) or have no effect on the secretion of MAs from wheat and barley roots into the rhizosphere (Gries et al. 1995; Pedler et al. 2000).
The biosynthesis of MAs and their corresponding genes have been characterized (Fig. 3b) as being synthesized from methionine (Mori and Nishizawa 1987). Three molecules of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) are combined to form one molecule of nicotianamine (NA) by nicotianamine synthase (NAS). NA is then converted to the 3′′-keto acid by NA aminotransferase (NAAT), and 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA) is synthesized by DMA synthase (DMAS). In some graminaceous species, including barley, DMA is further hydroxylated by two dioxygenases, IDS2 and IDS3 (Kobayashi et al. 2001; Nakanishi et al. 2000). The genes encoding the enzymes involved in DMA synthesis have been well-characterized in Fe-deficient rice and barley. The expression of HvNAS1, HvNAAT-A, HvNAAT-B, HvDMAS1, HvIDS2, and HvIDS3 is increased in Fe-deficient barley roots (Nakanishi et al. 1993; Okumura et al. 1994; Higuchi et al. 1999; Takahashi et al. 1999; Bashir et al. 2006). In rice, the expression of OsNAS1, OsNAS2, OsNAAT1, and OsDMAS1 is increased in both roots and shoots by Fe deficiency (Inoue et al. 2003; Bashir et al. 2006). The expression of OsNAS3 is increased in Fe-deficient roots, but decreased in Fe-deficient shoots (Inoue et al. 2003). Promoter-GUS analysis suggests that OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 are involved in DMA secretion, because those genes are expressed in all root cells. On the other hand, OsNAS3 may not be involved in DMA secretion because its expression is restricted to the pericycle and companion cells of the roots (Inoue et al. 2003).
Recently, we showed that the expression of NASHOR2, a NAS gene in barley (Herbik et al. 1999), and HvNAAT-B was increased in Zn-deficient barley shoots, but that the expression of IDS2 and IDS3 was not detected in Zn-deficient shoots (Suzuki et al. 2006). On the other hand, the expression of HvNAS1, HvNAAT-A, HvNAAT-B, IDS2, and IDS3 was increased in both Zn- and Fe-deficient barley roots, while the expression of these genes was not evident in Fe-deficient shoots (Suzuki et al. 2006). This suggests that in barley Zn deficiency induces DMA synthesis in shoots, while both Zn and Fe deficiency induce MAs synthesis and secretion in roots.
The aims of the present study were to examine if the stimulation of MAs secretion by Zn deficiency is common in graminaceous plants and roles of MAs in Zn homeostasis of rice plants. In this report, we shows that DMA secretion is decreased in rice roots, while the concentration of endogenous DMA is increased in Zn-deficient rice shoots.
Materials and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Rice seeds (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) were germinated for 7 days at room temperature on paper towels soaked with distilled water. After germination, the seedlings were transferred to a Saran net floating on nutrient solution (Higuchi et al. 2001) and grown in a glasshouse. After 4 days, 270 seedlings were transferred to six 20-l plastic containers containing nutrient solution. After a further 5 days, 90 seedlings were transferred to two 20-l plastic containers containing nutrient solution without Zn followed 7 days later when a further 90 seedlings were transferred to two 20-l plastic containers containing nutrient solution without Fe. All samples were harvested 5 days later for analysis. Consequently, the Zn-deficient treatment was performed for 12 days, and Fe-deficient treatment for 5 days since Fe deficiency has a much more rapid deleterious effect. The nutrient solutions were renewed weekly with adjustment to pH 5.5 every 2 days with KOH.
Measurement of DMA secretion and endogenous levels of DMA and NA
DMA secretion was measured as described by Suzuki et al. (2006) and the concentrations of endogenous DMA and NA were measured as described by Higuchi et al. (2001). Briefly, the roots of 12 plants were rinsed with deionized water and then placed in 600 ml of deionized water at sunrise. Root exudates were collected for two periods of 2 and 3 h. After collection, Micropur (Katadyn, Switzerland), an antimicrobial agent, was added to prevent microbial degradation of the MAs Both solutions containing root exudates were combined and filtered (Advantec 5C, Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Japan).
The shoots of the plants from which root exudates were collected were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Approximately 1 g of material was suspended in 40 ml of distilled water at 80°C for 30 min and filtered. The cationic fraction of the samples was prepared as a 2-M NH4OH eluate from Amberlite IR(H+)120 (Rohm and Haas Co., USA). The condensed and microfiltered samples were subjected to HPLC analysis, as described previously (Mori et al. 1987; Shojima et al. 1989). To ensure better separation of DMA, the pH of 0.15-N Li-citrate buffer was decreased to 2.97 and the pH of 0.2-N Li-citrate buffer increased to 3.30 for better separation of NA.
Northern blot analysis
The samples for Northern blot analysis were harvested 3 h after sunrise. The roots and shoots were separated immediately and stored at −80°C. Total RNA was extracted from the roots and shoots using SDS-phenol. Ten micrograms of total RNA were electrophoresed in 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels containing 0.66 M formaldehyde, then transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham, USA) and hybridized with probes at 65°C. The blots were analyzed using a Bio-imaging Analyzer System (BAS) 3000 (Fuji Film, Japan). The following specific primers were used to prepare specific probes: OsNAS1, 5′-GTCTAACAGCCGGACGATCGAAAGG-3′ and 5′-TTTCTCACTGTCATACACAGATGGC-3′; OsNAS2, 5′-TGAGTGCGTGCATAGTAATCCTGGC-3′ and 5′-CAGACGGTCACAAACACCTCTTGC-3′; OsNAS3, 5′-GACTGCTTCCATCGCTTGCTACCTC-3′ and 5′-CGCAACAGAGACAATGGTTGATTGT-3′; OsNAAT1, 5′-TAAGAGGATAATTGATTTGCTTAC-3′ and 5′-CTGATCATTCCAATCCTAGTACAAT-3′; and OsDMAS1, 5′-GCCGGCATCCCGCAGCGGAAGATCA-3′ and 5′-CTCTCTCTCTCGCACCTGCTAGCGT-3′. The accession numbers of the genes are AB021746 (OsNAS1), AB023818 (OsNAS2), AB023819 (OsNAS3), AB206814 (OsNAAT1), and AB269906 (OsDMAS1).
PETIS analysis of 62Zn translocation
PETIS experiment was established by Kume et al. (1997). 62Zn (half life: 9.13 h) was produced by the method of Watanabe et al. (2001). After adjustment of the 62Zn2+ solution to about pH 4 with 1 M KOH, 62Zn2+ was chelated with DMA in darkness for more than 3 h. Prior to the analysis, Zn-deficient rice plants were grown as described above but in a growth chamber (day: 30°C, 14 h of light at 320 μmol photons m−2 sec−1; night: 10 h at 25°C). The Zn-deficient rice plants were each supplied with 15 ml of culture solution lacking Zn in a polyethylene bag. The plants and bags were fixed between two acrylic boards and placed between a pair of PETIS detectors in a chamber set at 30°C, 65% humidity, and a light density of 320 μmol m−2 s−1. In the root absorption experiment, 62Zn (0.6 nmol) with DMA (79 nmol) was dissolved in 1 ml of distilled water and added to the culture solution. In the leaf absorption experiment, 62Zn (0.5 nmol) with DMA (33 nmol) was dissolved in 4.5 ml of nutrient solution containing cold Zn (2.5 μmol) and additional DMA (308 μmol), and supplied at the cut end of the second newest leaf. The individual leaves were cut to ensure a constant distance from discrimination center (DC) which is the junction of shoot and root (Kiyomiya et al. 2001). The γ-rays emitted from decaying positrons from 62Zn were counted over time using the coincident method with the paired detectors. The data were automatically corrected using 9.13 h as the half-life of 62Zn. The radioactivity of selected region was measured as region of interest (ROI) analysis. After PETIS analysis for 8 h, the plants were removed from the polyethylene bags, and the roots were gently washed for 1 min in 50 ml of 0.01 mM EDTA. Next, each plant was placed under a Bio-Imaging plate inside a cassette. The plate was scanned using an image analysis system (BAS-1500, Fuji Film, Japan). The plants were then cut into pieces, and the absolute amount of radioactivity was analyzed using γ-ray spectrometry with an ORTEC HPGe detector (Seiko EG & G Co., Ltd., Japan). Each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Due to the very short half-life of 62Zn, the radioactivity was different in each experiment. Therefore, images of individual plants and PETIS results are representative of those obtained.
Plant growth, DMA synthesis and gene expression
In the shoots, Fe deficiency increased the expression of OsNAS1, OsNAS2, OsNAAT1, and OsDMAS1, but decreased that of OsNAS3. In comparison, Zn deficiency increased the expression of OsNAS3 and especially that of OsNAAT1. The expression of OsDMAS1 was slightly increased in Zn-deficient shoots. Transcripts of OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 were not detected in control or Zn-deficient shoots (Fig. 3a).
Contribution of DMA to Zn translocation in Zn-deficient rice
The concentration of endogenous DMA is increased in Zn-deficient shoots, but DMA secretion from the roots is not increased
Previously we reported increased MAs secretion in Zn-deficient barley (Suzuki et al. 2006); however, in rice, Zn deficiency did not increase the secretion of DMA, but rather slightly decreased it (Fig. 2). Fe deficiency increased MAs secretion in both rice and barley (Suzuki et al. 2006; Fig. 2). In barley, expression of the genes encoding the MAs biosynthetic enzymes was increased in the roots of both Zn- and Fe-deficient plants (Suzuki et al. 2006). On the other hand, in rice, the expression pattern of the genes involved in DMA synthesis in roots was increased in Fe-deficient roots, while the expression of OsNAS1, OsNAS2, and OsDMAS1 was not increased in Zn-deficient roots (Fig. 3a). Inoue et al. (2003) suggested that OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 are involved in DMA secretion. Supporting this idea, the expression pattern of OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 in roots was in good correlation with the amount of DMA secreted (Figs. 2, 3a). On the other hand, OsNAS3 is thought not to be involved in DMA secretion, because the expression of OsNAS3 is restricted to the pericycle cells adjacent to the protoxylem and companion cells but not in other cortical cells (Inoue et al. 2003). The expression of OsNAS3 is observed in whole leaf tissues in the control plants (Inoue et al. 2003). The expression of OsNAS3 was increased in Zn-deficient roots and shoots (Fig. 3a); therefore, OsNAS3 may function to synthesize NA or subsequent components, such as DMA, for the distribution of Zn within Zn-deficient plants. It is noteworthy that Zn deficiency enhanced the expression of OsNAS3 in shoots, while Fe deficiency enhanced the expression of OsNAS1 and OsNAS2. This suggests that NA and DMA are involved both in Fe and Zn homeostasis, but that their synthesis under conditions of Fe and Zn deficiency is catalyzed by different isozymes.
The concentration of endogenous DMA in the shoots was increased by Zn and Fe deficiencies (Fig. 4a). Although the induction of OsNAAT1 in Zn-deficient shoots was much higher than that in Fe-deficient shoots, the concentration of DMA in Zn-deficient shoots was lower than that in Fe-deficient shoots. In accordance with the high level of OsNAAT1 expression in Zn-deficient shoots, the concentration of NA in Zn-deficient shoots was low (Fig. 4b). This result led to us hypothesize that OsDMAS1 is a rate-limiting enzyme for DMA synthesis in Zn-deficient rice.
Zn-DMA is the preferred form for long-distance transport of Zn in Zn-deficient rice
Recently, we showed that Zn-deficient barley absorbs more Zn-DMA than Zn2+ from its roots (Suzuki et al. 2006). In the present paper, however, less Zn-DMA than Zn2+ was absorbed from the roots of Zn-deficient rice (Fig. 5). These findings are correlated with the change in the amount of MAs secreted under Zn deficiency. In barley, MAs secretion is increased by Zn-deficiency, and this contributes to the absorption of Zn from the soil. On the other hand, in rice, the level of DMA secretion was slightly decreased (Fig. 2). This suggested that rice may prefer to absorb Zn2+ rather than Zn-DMA.
Our PETIS experiment clearly showed that more 62Zn was translocated to the newest leaf when 62Zn-DMA was supplied than when 62Zn2+ was supplied, while the opposite tendency was observed at the bottom of the leaf sheath (Fig. 5, supplemental movie 1). This finding suggests that Zn-DMA is the preferred form for long-distance transport of Zn in Zn-deficient rice. The preferential translocation of 62Zn-DMA was also observed in the PETIS experiment in which 62Zn-DMA and 62Zn2+ were supplied from the Zn-deficient leaf (Fig. 6, supplemental movie 2). These data also support the idea that Zn-DMA is the preferred form for long-distance transport of Zn in Zn-deficient rice.
Since DMA synthesis might be promoted by Zn deficiency in barley shoots (Suzuki et al. 2006), graminaceous plants have a common system for Zn translocation within the plant, while the contribution of MAs to Zn uptake from the soil differs among species. Further studies will enable us to understand the mechanism of Zn transport, to manipulate the distribution of Zn in order to produce crops that tolerate Zn-deficient stress, and to enhance the Zn content of crop seeds.
We thank Dr. Yoshiaki Nagamura (National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan) for providing the rice cDNA clones. We also thank to Dr. Pax Blamey (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia) and Dr. Takanori Kobayashi (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) for careful reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (Green Technology Project IP-5003).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Cakmak I, Gülüt KY, Marschner H, Graham RD (1994) Effect of zinc and iron deficiency on phytosiderophore release in wheat genotypes differing in zinc deficiency. J Plant Nutr 17:1–17Google Scholar
- Kiyomiya S, Nakanishi H, Uchida H, Tsuji A, Nishiyama S, Futatsubashi M, Tsukada H, Ishioka NS, Watanabe S, Osa A, Matsuhashi S, Hashimoto S, Sekine T, Mori S (2001) Real time visualization of 13N translocation in rice under different environmental conditions using positron emitting tracer imaging system. Plant Physiol 125:1743–1753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mori S, Nishizawa N (1987) Methionine as a dominant precursor of phytosiderophores in Graminaceae plants. Plant Cell Physiol 28:1081–1092Google Scholar
- Takagi S (1993) Production of phytosiderophores. In: Barton LL, Hemming BC (eds) Iron chelation in plants and soil microorganisms. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- von Wirén N, Marschner H, Römheld V (1996) Roots of iron-efficient maize also absorb phytosiderophore-chelated zinc. Plant Physiol 111:1119–1125Google Scholar