, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Maize photosynthesis and microclimate within the canopies at grain-filling stage in response to narrow-wide row planting patterns

  • T. D. Liu
  • F. B. Song


In China, narrow-wide row planting pattern has been advocated for maize (Zea mays L.) production. However, no previous study has clearly elucidated the complexity of factors affecting maize canopy such as the microclimatic factors, and the effect of photosynthesis in narrow-wide row planting pattern. The current study was undertaken to identify the planting patterns that influence microclimatic conditions and photosynthesis of two maize cultivars (Beiyu288 and Xianyu335) grown in three planting patterns: narrow-wide rows of (1) 30 cm + 170 cm (P1, 6.4 plants m−2), and (2) 40 cm + 90 cm (P2, 6.4 plants m−2), and (3) uniform row of 65 cm (CK, conventional row as control, 6.4 plants m−2). Light interception, temperature, relative humidity (RH), CO2 concentration, and leaf photosynthesis within the canopy were measured in each planting treatment at the grain-filling stage. The net photosynthetic rate (P N), intercellular CO2 concentration (C i), stomatal conductance (g s), transpiration rate (E), and temperature of the narrow-wide row exceeded that of the conventional row. The CO2 concentration and RH of the narrow-wide row were lower than CK by 50 cm strata. The narrow-wide row had a more uniform light intercepted at the whole canopy profile. The results of the current study suggest that narrow-wide row-planting pattern has a positive effect on canopy microclimate factors and promotes photosynthesis.

Additional key word

maize microclimate photosynthesis planting pattern 



intercellular CO2 concentration




transpiration rate


fraction of photosynthetically active radiation


stomatal conductance


incident photosynthetically active radiation


leaf area index


least significant difference


photosynthetically active radiation


net photosynthetic rate


relative humidity


radiation-use efficiency


standard deviation


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agele, S.O., Maraiyesa, I.O., Adeniji, I.A.: Effects of variety and row spacing on radiation interception, partitioning of dry matter and seed set efficiency in late season sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a humid zone of nigeria. — Afr. J. Agr. Res. 2: 80–88, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Anten, N.P.R.: Optimal photosynthetic characteristics of individual plants in vegetation stands and implications for species coexistence. — Ann. Bot. 95: 495–506, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkebauer, T.J., Walter-Shea, E.A., Mesarch, M.A., Suyker, A.E., Verma, S.B.: Scaling up of CO2 fluxes from leaf to canopy in maize-based agroecosystems. — Agr. Forest Meteorol. 149: 2110–2119, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awal, M.A., Koshi, H., Ikeda, T.: Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. — Agr. Forest Meteorol. 139: 74–83, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldocchi, D.D., Wilson, K.B., Gu, L.H.: How the environment, canopy structure and canopy physiological functioning influence carbon, water and energy fluxes of a temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest-an assessment with the biophysical model canoak. — Tree Physiol. 22: 1065–1077, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Asher, J., Garcia, A.G.Y., Hoogenboom, G.: Effect of high temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration of sweet corn (Zea mays L. Var. Rugosa). — Photosynthetica 46: 595–603, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cousins, A.B., Bloom, A.J.: Influence of elevated CO2 and nitrogen nutrition on photosynthesis and nitrate photoassimilation in maize (Zea mays L.). — Plant Cell Environ. 26: 1525–1530, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis, P.S., Vogel, C.S., Wang, X.Z., Pregitzer, K.S., Zak, D.R., Lussenhop, J., Kubiske, M., Teeri, J.A.: Gas exchange, leaf nitrogen, and growth efficiency of Populus tremuloides in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. — Ecol. Appl. 10: 3–17, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Drake, B.G., GonzalezMeler, M.A., Long, S.P.: More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? — Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 609–639, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan, Y.Z., Zhong, Z.M., Zhang, X.Z.: A comparative analysis of photosynthetic characteristics of hulless barley at two altitudes on the tibetan plateau. — Photosynthetica 49: 112–118, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallo, K.P., Daughtry, C.S.T.: Techniques for measuring intercepted and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in corn canopies. — Agron. J. 78: 752–756, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardiol, J.M., Serio, L.A., Della Maggiora, A.I.: Modelling evapotranspiration of corn (Zea mays L.) under different plant densities. — J. Hydrol. 271: 188–196, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heichel, G.H.: Prior illumination and respiration of maize leaves in dark. — Plant Physiol. 46: 359–&, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ihnken, S., Roberts, S., Beardall, J.: Differential responses of growth and photosynthesis in the marine diatom chaetoceros muelleri to CO2 and light availability. — Phycology 50: 182–193, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalttorres, W., Kerr, P.S., Usuda, H., Huber, S.C.: Diurnal changes in maize leaf photosynthesis .1. Carbon exchangerate, assimilate export rate, and enzyme-activities. — Plant Physiol. 83: 283–288, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S.H., Sicher, R.C., Bae, H., Gitz, D.C., Baker, J.T., Timlin, D.J., Reddy, V.R.: Canopy photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, leaf nitrogen, and transcription profiles of maize in response to co2 enrichment. — Glob. Change Biol. 12: 588–600, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, S.H., Gitz, D.C., Sicherb, R.C., Baker, J.T., Timlin, D.J., Reddy, V.R.: Temperature dependence of growth, development, and photosynthesis in maize under elevated CO2. — Environ. Exp. Bot. 61: 224–236, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimball, B.A., Bernacchi, C.J.: Evapotranspiration, canopy temperature, and plant water relations. — In: Nosberger, J., Long, S.P., Norby, R.J., Stitt, M., Hendrey, G.R., Blum, H. (ed.): Ecological Studies Managed Ecosystems and CO2. Pp. 311–324. Springer, Dordrecht 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Leuning, R., Wang, Y.P., Cromer, R.N.: Model simulations of spatial distributions and daily totals of photosynthesis in Eucalyptus grandis canopies. — Oecologia 88: 494–503, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Loewe, A., Einig, W., Shi, L., Dizengremel, P., Hampp, R.: Mycorrhiza formation and elevated CO2 both increase the capacity for sucrose synthesis in source leaves of spruce and aspen. — New Phytol. 145: 565–574, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maddonni, G., Chelle, M., Drouet, J.L., Andrieu, B.: Light interception of contrasting azimuth canopies under square and rectangular plant spatial distributions: Simulations and crop measurements. — Field Crop. Res. 70: 1–13, 2001a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maddonni, G.A., Otegui, M.E., Cirilo, A.G.: Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. — Field Crop Res. 71: 183–193, 2001b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maddonni, G.A., Cirilo, A.G., Otegui, M.E.: Row width and maize grain yield. — Agron. J. 98: 1532–1543, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meir, P., Kruijt, B., Broadmeadow, M., Barbosa, E., Kull, O., Carswell, F., Nobre, A., Jarvis, P.G.: Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. — Plant Cell Environ. 25: 343–357, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morison, J.I.L.: Sensitivity of stomata and water-use efficiency to high CO2. — Plant Cell Environ. 8: 467–474, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niinemets, U., Valladares, F.: Photosynthetic acclimation to simultaneous and interacting environmental stresses along natural light gradients: Optimality and constraints. — Plant Biol. 6: 254–268, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niinemets, U., Cescatti, A., Rodeghiero, M., Tosens, T.: Complex adjustments of photosynthetic potentials and internal diffusion conductance to current and previous light availabilities and leaf age in mediterranean evergreen species quercus ilex. — Plant Cell Environ. 29: 1159–1178, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nowak, R.S., Ellsworth, D.S., Smith, S.D.: Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 — do photosynthetic and productivity data from face experiments support early predictions? — New Phytol. 162: 253–280, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pattey, E., Rochette, P., Desjardins, R.L., Dubé, P.A.: Estimation of the net CO2 assimilation rate of a maize (Zea mays L.) canopy from leaf chamber measurements. — Agr. Forest Meteorol. 55: 37–57, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saxe, H., Ellsworth, D.S., Heath, J.: Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. — New Phytol. 139: 395–436, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schurr, U., Walter, A., Rascher, U.: Functional dynamics of plant growth and photosynthesis — from steady-state to dynamics — from homogeneity to heterogeneity. — Plant Cell Environ. 29: 340–352, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sciutti, R., Morini, S.: Water-loss and photosynthesis of plum plantlets is influenced by relative-humidity during rooting in vitro. — J Hort. Sci. 70: 221–228, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. Shuting, D., Changhao, H., Rongqi, G.: Rates of apparent photosynthesis, respiration and dry matter accumulation in maize canopies. — Biol. Plant. 35: 273–277, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singsaas, E.L., Sharkey, T.D.: The effects of high temperature on isoprene synthesis in oak leaves. — Plant Cell Environ. 23: 751–757, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart, D.W., Dwyer, L.M., Carrigan, L.L.: Phenological temperature response of maize. — Agron. J. 90: 73–79, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swan, I.R., Volum, A.G.: Estimation of evaporation from temperature and relative-humidity. — J. Aust. Inst. Agr. Sci. 52: 222–224, 1986.Google Scholar
  37. Valladares, F.: Light heterogeneity and plants: From ecophysiology to species coexistence and biodiversity. — Prog. Bot. 64: 439–471, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vidovič, J.: Effect of the change of leaf angle arrangement on productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) stands. — Biol. Plant. 16: 174–183, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, Z., Yang, W.Y., Wu, X.Y., Wu, Q.L.: [Effects of maize plant type and planting width on the early morphological characters and yield of relay planted soybean.] — Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 19: 323–329, 2008. [In Chin.]Google Scholar
  40. Ward, J.K., Strain, B.R.: Elevated CO2 studies: Past, present and future. — Tree Physiol. 19: 211–220, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watling, J.R., Press, M.C., Quick, W.P.: Elevated CO2 induces biochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of the C4 cereal sorghum. — Plant Physiol. 123: 1143–1152, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao, A.: [The study of leaf blade function in summer maize.] — Till. Cultiv. 4: 26–32, 1986. [In Chin.]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesJinlin, ChangchunChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations