Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist

Correction
  • 85 Downloads

1 Correction to: Philos Stud DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-1001-7

In the original publication of the article, footnote 17 was incorrectly published. The corrected footnote is given below.

Footnote 17:

Hellman (2001, pp. 193–6), Button and Walsh (2016, §2.3), and Ketland (ms.) have briefly discussed the permutation argument in the context of ante-rem structuralism. I will expand the argument and the structuralist’s possible responses. Hellman’s paper is the original source of the permutation argument in this context.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBirkbeck CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations