Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 174, Issue 8, pp 2105–2123 | Cite as

Vagueness and zombies: why ‘phenomenally conscious’ has no borderline cases

Article

Abstract

I argue that there can be no such thing as a borderline case of the predicate ‘phenomenally conscious’: for any given creature at any given time, it cannot be vague whether that creature is phenomenally conscious at that time. I first defend the Positive Characterization Thesis, which says that for any borderline case of any predicate there is a positive characterization of that case that can show any sufficiently competent speaker what makes it a borderline case. I then appeal to the familiar claim that zombies are conceivable, and I argue that this claim entails that there can be no positive characterizations of borderline cases of ‘phenomenally conscious’. By the Positive Characterization Thesis, it follows that ‘phenomenally conscious’ can not have any borderline cases.

Keywords

Phenomenal consciousness Vagueness Explanatory gap Conceivability argument Knowledge argument 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments to audiences in Canberra, New York, Sydney, Toronto, Wagga Wagga, and Wollongong, and in particular to Eli Alshanetsky, Michael Antony, Ned Block, Paul Boghossian, David Chalmers, Kit Fine, Franz Huber, Geoffrey Lee, Dan Lopez de Sa, Colin Marshall, John Morrison, Diana Raffman, Michael Raven, Stephen Schiffer, Miguel Sebastian, Ted Sider, Nicholas J.J. Smith, Sharon Street, Peter Unger, Robbie Williams and Achille Varzi.

References

  1. Alter, T. (2013). Social externalism and the knowledge argument. Mind, 122(486), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston, W. (1964). Philosophy of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Antony, M. (2008). Are our concepts conscious state and conscious creature vague? Synthese, 68(2), 239–263.Google Scholar
  4. Antony, M. (2006a). Vagueness and the metaphysics of consciousness. Philosophical Studies, 128, 515–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antony, M. (2006b). Papineau on the vagueness of phenomenal concepts. Dialectica, 60(4), 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, D. (2013). Consciousness and conceptual mastery. Mind, 122(486), 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balog, K. (ms.). Hard, harder, hardest. http://philpapers.org/rec/BALHHH. Accessed 23 Sept 2016.
  8. Balog, K. (2012). In defense of the phenomenal concept strategy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, N. (2002). Some concepts of consciousness. In D. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Block, N., & Stalnaker, R. (1999). Conceptual analysis, dualism, and the explanatory gap. The Philosophical Review, 108, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bostrom, N. (2006). Quantity of experience: Brain duplication and degrees of consciousness. Minds and Machines, 16, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boghossian, P. (2010). A companion to epistemology. In Bernecker & Pritchard (Eds.), Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Boghossian, P. (2003a) Epistemic analyticity: A defense. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 66, 15–35.Google Scholar
  14. Boghossian, P. (2003b). The normativity of content. Philosophical Issues, 13, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brogaard, B. (2010). Degrees of consciousness. In Presented at the SPAWN conference on metaphysics, Syracuse University. Accessed at https://sites.google.com/site/brogaardb/home.
  17. Chalmers, D. (2013). Constructing the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chalmers, D., & Jackson, F. (2001). Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation. Philosophical Review, 110, 315–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dennett, D. (1998). Animal consciousness: What matters and why. In D. Dennett (Ed.), Brainchildren. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. deRosset, L. (2013). Analyticity and ontology. OUP: Oxford Studies in Metaphysics.Google Scholar
  21. Dummett, M. (1975). Wang’s paradox. Synthese, 30, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dorr, C. (2003). Vagueness without ignorance. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1), 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eklund, M. (2005). What vagueness consists in. Philosophical Studies, 125, 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fara, D. G. (2000). Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 28, 45–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine, K. (1975). Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthse, 30, 265–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaifman, H. (2010). Vagueness, tolerance and contextual logic. Synthese, 174, 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ginsborg, H. (2012). The normativity of meaning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 86, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glüer, K., & Wikforss, Å., (2015). The normativity of meaning and content. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ sum2015/entries/meaning-normativity/.
  29. Goff, P. (2013) Orthodox property dualism + linguistic theory of vagueness = panpsychism. In Brown, R. (Ed.) Consciousness inside and out. Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Greenough, P. (2003) Vagueness: A minimal theory. Mind, 112(446).Google Scholar
  31. Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 1–45.Google Scholar
  32. Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, D. (1975). Languages and language. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science vol. VII, (pp. 3–35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. McGinn, C. (1996). The character of mind (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking about consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Papineau, D. (1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Pereboom, D. (2011). Consciousness and the prospects of physicalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rabin, G. (2011). Conceptual mastery and the knowledge argument. Philosophical Studies, 154, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raffman, D. (1996). Vagueness and context-relativity. Philosophical Studies, 81(2–3), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schiffer, S. (2003). The things we mean. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapiro, S. (2006/2008). Vagueness in context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sebastian, M. (2011). Self involving representationalism: A naturalistic theory of phenomenal consciousness. Doctoral Dissertation, LOGOS, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, N. J. J. (2005). Vagueness as closeness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83(2), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoljar, D. (2001). Two conceptions of the physical. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62, 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, color, and content. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tye, M. (1996). Is consciousness vague or arbitrary? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56(3), 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Unger, P. (2004). The mental problems of the many. In D. Zimmerman (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaphysics (Vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Unger, P. (1988). Conscious beings in a gradual world. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 12(1), 287–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weatherson, B. (2010). Vagueness as indeterminacy. In Dietz & Morruzzi (Eds.), Cuts and clouds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Weatherson, B. (2003). Many many problems. Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 481–501.Google Scholar
  54. Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. New York: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Wright, C. (2001). On being in a quandary: Relativism, vagueness, logical revisionism. Mind, 110, 45–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, C. (1975). On the coherence of vague predicates. Synthese, 30, 325–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuboff, A. (1981). The story of a brain. In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (Eds.), The Mind's I. Basic Books (pp. 202–212).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NYU Department of PhilosophyCenter for Mind, Brain and ConsciousnessNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations