Philosophical Studies

, Volume 168, Issue 3, pp 583–597 | Cite as

Neo-Aristotelian Plenitude

  • Ross Inman


Plenitude, roughly, the thesis that for any non-empty region of spacetime there is a material object that is exactly located at that region, is often thought to be part and parcel of the standard Lewisian package in the metaphysics of persistence. While the wedding of plentitude and Lewisian four-dimensionalism is a natural one indeed, there are a hand-full of dissenters who argue against the notion that Lewisian four-dimensionalism has exclusive rights to plentitude. These ‘promiscuous’ three-dimensionalists argue that a temporalized version of plenitude is entirely compatible with a three-dimensional ontology of enduring entities. While few would deny the coherence of such a position, and much work has been done by its proponents to appease critics, there has been surprisingly little by way of exploring the various forms such an ontology might take as well as the potential advantages of one plenitudinous three-dimensional ontology over another. Here I develop a novel form of plenitudinous three-dimensionalism, what John Hawthorne (Metaphysical essays, 2006a, b) has called “Neo-Aristotelian Plenitude,” and argue that if one is inclined to endorse an abundant three-dimensional ontology, one is wise to opt for a plenitude of accidental unities.


Persistence Plenitude Three-dimensionalism Four-dimensionalism Hylomorphism Thomas Aquinas Truthmaking Temporary Intrinsics 


  1. Armstrong, D. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, in three volumes, Trans.). New York: Benziger Bros.Google Scholar
  3. Aquinas, T. (1962). Sententia super Peri hermenias (J. T. Oesterle, Trans.). Aristotle on interpretation: Commentary by St. Thomas and Cajetan. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aquinas, T. (1964). Sententia super Metaphysicam (J. P. Rowan, Trans.). Commentary on the metaphysics of Aristotle. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
  5. Aquinas, T. (1965). De Ente et Essentia (Joseph Bobik, Trans.). Aquinas on being and essence: A translation and interpretation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aquinas, T. (1993). De Principiis Naturae: On the principles of nature (Timothy McDermott, Trans.). Aquinas: Selected philosophical writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brower, J. E. (2010). Aristotelian endurantism: A new solution to the problem of temporary intrinsics. Mind, 119, 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brower, J. E. (2012). Matter, form, and individuation. In B. Davies & E. Stump (Eds.), The Oxford handbook to Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brower, J. E., & Brower-Toland, S. (2008). Aquinas on mental representation: Concepts and intentionality. Philosophical Review, 117(2), 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, C. M. (2005). Aquinas and the ship of theseus: Solving puzzles about material objects. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Fine, K. (1981). Acts, events, and things. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium on Language and Ontology (pp. 97–105).Google Scholar
  12. Hawthorne, J. (2006a). Plenitude, convention, and ontology. In Metaphysical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hawthorne, J. (2006b). Motion and plenitude. In Metaphysical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hudson, H. (2001). A materialist metaphysics of the human person. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Inman, R. (2012). Essential dependence, truthmaking, and mereology: Then and now. In L. Novák, D. Novotný, P. Sousedík, & D. Svoboda (Eds.), Metaphysics: Aristotelian, scholastic, analytic. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, M. (2006). Hylomorphism. Journal of Philosophy, 103(12), 652–698.Google Scholar
  17. Koslicki, K. (2003). The crooked path from vagueness to four-dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies, 114, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koslicki, K. (2008). The structure of objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leftow, B. (2003). Aquinas on attributes. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 11, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, D. (2003). Things qua truthmakers. In H. Lillehammer & G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (Eds.), Real metaphysics: Essays in honor of D. H. Mellor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lowe, E. J. (2005). Vagueness and endurance. Analysis, 65(2), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthews, G. B. (1982). Accidental Unities. In M. Schofield & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Language and logos: Studies in ancient Greek philosophy presented by G.E.L. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, K. (2005). Blocking the path from vagueness to four-dimensionalism. Ratio (new series) XVIII.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, K. (2008). Endurantism, diachronic vagueness, and the problem of the many. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 89, 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulligan, K., Simons, P., & Smith, B. (1984). Truth-makers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44, 287–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oderberg, D. (2007). Real essentialism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parsons, J. (2007). Theories of location. In D. Zimmerman (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaphysics. (Vol. 3, pp. 201– 232). Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pawl, T. J. (2012). Transubstantiation, tropes, and truthmakers. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 86, No. 1.Google Scholar
  29. Rea, M. (1998a). In defense of mereological universalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(2), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rea, M. (1998b). Sameness without identity: An Aristotelian solution to the problem of material constitution. Ratio, 11, 316–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schaffer, J. (2008). Truthmaker commitments. Philosophical Studies, 141, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaffer, J. (2009). On what grounds what. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schaffer, J. (2010). Monism: The priority of the whole. Philosophical Review, 119, No. 1.Google Scholar
  34. Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism: An ontology of persistence and time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steen Kurtsal, I. (2010). Three-dimensionalist’s semantic solution to diachronic vagueness. Philosophical Studies, 150, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stump, E. (2003). Aquinas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Toner, P. (2008). Emergent substance. Philosophical Studies, 141, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Varzi, A. (2007). Promiscuous endurantism and diachronic vagueness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 181–189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trinity CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations