Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 144, Issue 3, pp 391–401 | Cite as

Structural equations and causation: six counterexamples

  • Christopher Hitchcock
Article

Abstract

Hall [(2007), Philosophical Studies, 132, 109–136] offers a critique of structural equations accounts of actual causation, and then offers a new theory of his own. In this paper, I respond to Hall’s critique, and present some counterexamples to his new theory. These counterexamples are then diagnosed.

Keywords

Causation Counterfactuals Causal models Structural equations 

References

  1. Glymour, C., Danks, D., Glymour, B., Eberhardt, F., Ramsey, J., Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., Teng, C., & Zhang J. (2007). MS. Actual causation: A stone soup essay.Google Scholar
  2. Hall, N. (2004). Two concepts of causation. In J. Collins, N. Hall, & L. Paul (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals (pp. 225–276). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hall, N. (2007). Structural equations and causation. Philosophical Studies, 132, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Halpern, J., & Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 843–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hitchcock, C. (2001). The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hitchcock, C. (2007a). Prevention, preemption, and the principle of sufficient reason. Philosophical Review, 116, 495–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hitchcock, C. (2007b). What’s wrong with neuron diagrams. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, & H. S. Silverstein (Eds.), Causation and explanation (pp. 69–92). Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Yablo, S. (2002). De facto dependence. Journal of Philosophy, 99, 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Humanities and Social SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations