Philosophical Studies

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 71–79 | Cite as

Reasons, Relevance and Salience: A Response to Hookway

  • Jonathan Dancy


This paper responds to Christopher Hookway’s article, “Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtue.”


Philosophical Study Relevant Consideration Relevant Sentence Pointed Question Epistemic Standing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Dancy, J. 2004Ethics Without PrinciplesClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Hookway, C. (2006): `Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtue’, Philosophical Studies 130(1): 47–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ReadingWhiteknights, ReadingUK
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations