Philosophical Studies

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 347–380 | Cite as

Beyond Logical Form

  • Brendan Jackson


Logical Form Logical Consequence Logical Constant Language Faculty Prepositional Phrase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chomsky N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge .Google Scholar
  2. Davidson D. (1984). Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation. Clarendon Press, Oxford .Google Scholar
  3. Davidson, D. (1984a): ‘Semantics for Natural Languages’, in Davidson 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, D. (1984b): ‘In Defence of Convention T’, in Davidson 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D. (1984c): ‘Radical Interpretation’, in Davidson 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, D. (1984d): ‘Reply to Foster’, in Davidson 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson D. (1980). Essays on Actions & Events. Clarendon Press, Oxford .Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, D. (1980a): ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Davidson 1980.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, D. (1980b): ‘Criticism, Comment and Defence’, in Davidson 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Dowty D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston .Google Scholar
  11. Evans G. (1985). Collected Papers. Clarendon Press, Oxford .Google Scholar
  12. Evans, G. (1985a): ‘Semantic Structure and Logical Form’, in Evans 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, G. (1985b): ‘A Further Reflection on Semantic Structure and Logical Form’, in Evans 1985.Google Scholar
  14. Evans G. and McDowell J. (1976). Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics. Clarendon Press, Oxford .Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. (1970): ‘Three Reasons not to Derive ‘Kill’ from ‘Cause to die’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 429–438.Google Scholar
  16. Fodor J. and Ernest L. (1992). Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge .Google Scholar
  17. Foster, J.A. (1976): ‘Meaning and Truth Theory’, in Evans and McDowell 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Harman G. (1999). Reasoning, Meaning and Mind. Clarendon Press, Oxford .Google Scholar
  19. Harman, G. (1999b): ‘The Death of Meaning’, in Harman 1999.Google Scholar
  20. Higginbotham, J. (1992): ‘Truth and Understanding’, Philosophical Studies 65, 3–16.Google Scholar
  21. Larson R. and Segal G. (1995). Knowledge of Meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge .Google Scholar
  22. Linsky L. (1952). Semantics and the Philosophy of Language. University of Illinois Press, Urbana .Google Scholar
  23. May R. (1985). Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge .Google Scholar
  24. Parsons T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge .Google Scholar
  25. Pietroski, P. (2002): ‘Function and Concatenation’, in Preyer and Peter 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Preyer G. and Peter G. (2002). Logical Form and Language. Oxford University Press, New York .Google Scholar
  27. Quine, W.V. (1991): ‘Two Dogmas in Retrospect’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 265–274.Google Scholar
  28. Quine W.V. (1970). Philosophy of Logic. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs .Google Scholar
  29. Russell B. (1920). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Dover Publications, Inc, New York .Google Scholar
  30. Soames, S. (1992): ‘Truth, Meaning, and Understanding’, Philosophical Studies 65, 17–35.Google Scholar
  31. Soames, S. (1989): ‘Semantics and Semantic Competence’, Philosophical Perspectives 3: Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory 65, 575–596.Google Scholar
  32. Stanley, J. (2000): ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434.Google Scholar
  33. Tarski, A. (1952): ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’, in Linsky 1952.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brendan JacksonIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations