Exploring how the psychiatrist experiences the patient during the diagnostic evaluation: the Assessment of Clinician’s Subjective Experience (ACSE)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Albarella, C., & Donadio, M. (Eds.). (1998). Il controtransfert. Saggi Psicoanalitici [Countertransference. Psychoanalytical essays]. Naples: Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreasen, N. C. (2007). DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berrios, G. E. (2013). Per una nuova epistemologia della psichiatria [towards a new epistemology of psychiatry]. Rome: Giovanni Fioriti Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Binswanger, L. (1924). Welche Aufgaben ergeben sick für die Psychiatrie aus den Fortschritten der neueren Psychologie? Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 91(1), 402–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolognini, S. (2002). L’empatia psicoanalitica [psychoanalytical empathy]. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callieri, B. (1985). Antropologia e psichiatria clinica. Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria, 4(3), 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, B. M. (2016). Embracing complexity in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and research. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1211–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deacon, B. J. (2013). The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 846–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Englebert, J., Monville, F., Valentiny, C., Mossay, F., Pienkos, E., & Sass, L. (2019). Anomalous experience of self and world: Administration of the EASE and EAWE scales to four subjects with schizophrenia. Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503117.

  10. Fava, G. A., Rafanelli, C., & Tomba, E. (2012). The clinical process in psychiatry: A clinimetric approach. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77, 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fonzi, L., Pallagrosi, M., Picardi, A., D’Orazio, M., Zerella, M. P., Orso, L., et al. (2011). Clinician’s emotional resonance as investigation tool: development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire. Rivista di Psichiatria, 46, 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XI, pp. 141–151). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs, T. (2010). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in psychiatric diagnosis. Psychopathology, 43, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fuchs, T. (2015). Pathologies of intersubjectivity in autism and schizophrenia. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs, T. (2017). Levels of empathy – Primary, extended and reiterated empathy. In V. Lux & S. Weigel (Eds.), Empathy. Epistemic problems and cultural-historical perspectives of a cross-disciplinary concept (pp. 27–47). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs, T., & Pallagrosi, M. (2018). Phenomenology of temporality and psychopathological dimensions. In M. Biondi, M. Pasquini, & A. Picardi (Eds.), Dimensional psychopathology (pp. 287–300). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galbusera, L., & Fellin, L. (2014). The intersubjective endeavor of psychopathology research: Methodological reflections on a second-person perspective approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guidano, V. F. (1987). Complexity of the self. A developmental approach to psychopathology and therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, M., Potter, N., & Goyer, S. (2019). Diagnostic reasoning in psychiatry: Acknowledging an explicit role for Intersubjective knowing. Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jablensky, A. (2016). Psychiatric classifications: Validity and utility. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaspers, K. (1913). Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kendler, K. (2017). DSM disorders and their criteria: How should they inter-relate? Psychological Medicine, 47(12), 2054–2060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lanzoni, S. (2006). Diagnosing with feeling: The clinical assessment of schizophrenia in early twentieth-century European psychiatry. In F. B. Alberti (Ed.), Medicine, emotion and disease, 1700–1950 (pp. 169–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luft, S., & Schlimme, J. E. (2013). The phenomenology of intersubjectivity in Jaspers and Husserl: On the capacities and limits of empathy and communication in psychiatric praxis. Psychopathology, 46, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McGorry, P. D. (2013). The next stage for diagnosis: Validity through utility. World Psychiatry, 12, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Minkowski, E. (1927). La schizophrénie. Psychopathologie des schizoïdes et des schizophrènes. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minkowski, E. (1933). Le temps vécu. Etudes phénoménologiques et psychopathologiques. Paris: Coll. de l’Evolution Psychiatrique.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moskalewicz, M., Schwartz, M. A., & Gozé, T. (2018). Phenomenology of intuitive judgment: Praecox-feeling in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Avant, 9(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nagar, M., Westen, D., & Nakash, O. (2018). Reliability of DSM and empirically derived prototype diagnosis for mood. anxiety and personality disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 85, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Neeleman, J. (1990). The nuclear symptom of schizophrenia and the praecoxfeeling. History of Psychiatry, 1990(1), 331–341.

  35. Noll, R. (2018). Feeling and smelling psychosis: American alienism, psychiatry, prodromes and the limits of “category work”. History of the Human Sciences, 31(2), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2013). The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 263, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nordgaard, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2019). Phenomenological psychopathology and quantitative research. In G. Stanghellini, M. Broome, A. Raballo, A. Fernandez, P. Fusar-Poli, & R. Rosfort (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology (pp. 941–951). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pallagrosi, M., & Fonzi, L. (2018). On the concept of praecox feeling. Psychopathology, 51, 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., Picardi, A., & Biondi, M. (2014). Assessing clinician’s subjective experience during interaction with patients. Psychopathology, 47(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., Picardi, A., & Biondi, M. (2016). Association between clinician’s subjective experience during patient evaluation and psychiatric diagnosis. Psychopathology, 49(2), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pallagrosi, M., Picardi, A., Fonzi, L., & Biondi, M. (2018). Psychopathological dimensions and the clinician’s subjective experience. In M. Biondi, M. Pasquini, & A. Picardi (Eds.), Dimensional Psychopathology (pp. 267–286). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Parnas, J. (2015). Differential diagnosis and current polythetic classification. World Psychiatry, 14, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2002). The role of phenomenology in psychiatric diagnosis and classification. In M. Maj, W. Gaebel, J. J. López-Ibor, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Psychiatric diagnosis and classification (pp. 137–161). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005). EASE: Examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology, 38, 236–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013). Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Picardi, A. (2019). The two faces of first-rank symptoms. Psychopathology, 52, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Picardi, A., Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., & Biondi, M. (2017). Psychopathological dimensions and the clinician’s subjective experience. Psychiatry Research, 258, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rasmussen, A. R., Stephensen, H., & Parnas, J. (2018). EAFI: Examination of anomalous fantasy and imagination. Psychopathology, 51(3), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rümke, H. C. (1941). Das Kernsymptom der Schizophrenie und das 'Praecox Gefühl'. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 102, 168–175.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sass, L., Pienkos, E., Skodlar, B., Stanghellini, G., Fuchs, T., Parnas, J., & Jones, N. (2017). EAWE: Examination of anomalous world experience. Psychopathology, 50, 10–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schneider, K. (1936). Psychiatrische Vorlesungen für Ärzte (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schultze-Lutter, F., Schmidt, S. J., & Theodoridou, A. (2018). Psychopathology—A precision tool in need of re-sharpening. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sholokhova, S. (2019). Benefits and challenges of the phenomenological approach to the psychiatrist’s subjective experience: Impassivity, neutrality, and embodied awareness in the clinical encounter. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 26(4), E-83–E-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Southard, E. E. (1918). The empathic index in the diagnosis of mental diseases. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 13(4), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Spillius, E., & O’Shaughnessy, E. (Eds.). (2012). Projective identification: The fate of a concept. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stanghellini, G. (2007). The grammar of the psychiatric interview. Psychopathology, 40, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tansey, M. J., & Burke, W. F. (1989). Understanding countertransference: From projective identification to empathy. New York: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tellenbach, H. (1968). Geschmack und Atmosphäre. Medien menschlichen Elementarkontaktes. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Van Duppen, Z. (2017). The intersubjective dimension of schizophrenia. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 24(4), 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Varga, S. (2013). Vulnerability to psychosis, I-thou intersubjectivity and the praecox-feeling. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wyrsch, J. (1946). Über die Intuition bei der Erkennung der Schizophrenen. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, 46, 1173–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy. Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Study, 8(5–7), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zahavi, D. (2004). Phenomenology and the project of naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zahavi, D. (2014). Empathy and other-directed intentionality. Topoi, 33, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zahavi, D. (2019a). Phenomenology: The basics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zahavi, D. (2019b). Applied phenomenology: Why it is safe to ignore epoché. Continental Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Pallagrosi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonzi, L., Pallagrosi, J., Picardi, A. et al. Exploring how the psychiatrist experiences the patient during the diagnostic evaluation: the Assessment of Clinician’s Subjective Experience (ACSE). Phenom Cogn Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09729-y

Download citation