Skip to main content
Log in

A practical approach toward teaching ethics to community pharmacists

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Pharmacists as highly qualified professionals face ethical dilemmas and conflicts in their daily practice. These issues manifest themselves in the daily practice of pharmacists, which require pharmacists to have the competencies to manage these dilemmas but there is limited formal training in ethical decision making during undergraduate pharmacy education. Objective To describe the implementation and evaluation of a methodological approach to managing ethical dilemma workshop for community pharmacists in Malaysia. Setting Community pharmacists in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Method During the workshop, pharmacists were provided insights into how they could use and apply a methodological approach towards managing a dilemma, followed by a case study and panel discussion. All participants were invited to complete a pre- and post-workshop questionnaire Main outcome measure Number and proportion of respondents answering questions related to practice of ethics and workshop effectiveness Results A total of 37 participants attended the workshop. Most of the participants reported that they had no formal training in professional ethics and often used their own approach to solve an ethical issue. Some of the most common issues mentioned include changing medication to generic. More than three quarter of participants agreed and strongly agreed the content was relevant to their job and they will be able to use what they learned in the program. Conclusion The evidence suggests that a module in ethical decision making should be introduced to community pharmacists in Malaysia. This module can be easily adapted for use in other countries and will help ensure that pharmacist can make a good professional judgement and deliver the deeds of beneficence to all their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernheim RG. Public health ethics: the voices of practitioners. J Law Med Ethics. 2003;31(s4):104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aceijas C, Brall C, Schröder-Bäck P, Otok R, Maeckelberghe E, Stjernberg L, et al. Teaching ethics in schools of public health in the European region: findings from a screening survey. Publ Health Rev. 2012;34(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Arifi MN. Community pharmacist perception and attitude toward ethical issues at community pharmacy setting in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(4):315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Appelbe GE, Wingfield J. Dale and Appelbe’s pharmacy law and ethics. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Pharmacist ethics and professional autonomy: imperatives for keeping pharmacy aligned with the public interest. Bangkok: International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hudson SA, McAnaw JJ, Johnson BJ. The changing roles of pharmacists in society. IeJSME. 2007;1(1):22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S, Chong C, Chong D. Identifying and addressing drug-related problems in nursing homes: an unmet need in Malaysia? Int J Clin Pract. 2016;70:512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SWH, Mak VSL. Changing demographics in Asia: a case for enhanced pharmacy services to be provided to nursing homes. J Pharm Pract Res. 2016;46(2):152–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SWH, Bell SJ. Pharmaceutical care in Asia. In: da Costa FA, van Mil JWF, Alvarez-Risco A, editors. The pharmacist guide to implementing pharmaceutical care. 1st ed. Basel: Springer; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malaysian Laws on Poisons and Sale of Drugs: Poisons Act 1952; 2000. Retrieved from https://www.pharmacy.gov.my/v2/sites/default/files/document-upload/poisons-act-1952-act-366.pdf on 20 July 2018.

  11. Pharmacy Board Malaysia. Code of conduct for pharmacists and bodies corporate. Putrajaya: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2009. Retrieved from https://www.pharmacy.gov.my/v2/sites/default/files/document-upload/code-conduct-pharmacists-and-bodies-corporate-pharmacy-board-malaysia-1.pdf.

  12. Lee SWH, Mak VSL. Train-the-trainer program on cardiovascular health for community pharmacists in Malaysia. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(6):1166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schröder-Bäck P, Duncan P, Sherlaw W, Brall C, Czabanowska K. Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ethics in public health programmes. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Resnik DB, Ranelli PL, Resnik SP. The Conflict between ethics and business in community pharmacy: what about patient counseling? J Bus Ethics. 2000;28(2):179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory PAM, Austin Z. Conflict in community pharmacy practice: the experience of pharmacists, technicians and assistants. Can Pharm J Rev Des Pharm Can. 2016;150(1):32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Betty C, Jo-anne B, Ines K. Professional ethics in pharmacy: the Australian experience. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13(3):195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hibbert D, Rees JA, Smith I. Ethical awareness of community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8(2):82–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Arifi MN. Community pharmacist perception and attitude toward ethical issues at community pharmacy setting in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J SPJ. 2014;22(4):315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hibbert D, Rees JA, Smith I. Ethical awareness of community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8(2):82–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaar B, Brien JA, Krass I. Professional ethics in pharmacy: the Australian experience. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13(3):195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alabid Alamin Hassan MA, Ibrahim Mohamed Izham M, Hassali Mohamed Azmi A. Dispensing practices of general practitioners and community pharmacists in Malaysia–a pilot study. J Pharm Pract Res. 2015;43(3):187–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Babar ZUD, Ibrahim MIM, Singh H, Bukahri NI, Creese A. Evaluating drug prices, availability, affordability, and price components: implications for access to drugs in Malaysia. PLOS Med. 2007;4(3):e82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper R, Bissell P, Wingfield J. Dilemmas in dispensing, problems in practice? Ethical issues and law in UK community pharmacy. Clin Ethics. 2007;2(2):103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the participants and colleagues at the School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia as well as individuals at Malaysian Pharmaceutical Society for their support and help.

Funding

This work was supported by Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning and Change (Grant Number 2110531-120-00), in support of organizations for projects related to medical education. The Grant was awarded to Monash University Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. to address educational needs of the community pharmacists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun Wen Huey Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saw, P.S., Chuah, L.H. & Lee, S.W.H. A practical approach toward teaching ethics to community pharmacists. Int J Clin Pharm 40, 1131–1136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0707-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0707-8

Keywords

Navigation