Skip to main content
Log in

Is pharmacovigilance of biologicals cost-effective?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance is an essential part of the post-marketing surveillance of new biologicals. It not only requires a substantial investment of the marketing authorization holder but also of the clinical field to provide accurate safety information. Hence, does pharmacovigilance delivers value for money? This important question needs to be discussed in the light of regulatory requirements, value and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouvy JC, Ebbers HC, Schellekens H, Koopmanschap MA. The cost-effectiveness of periodic safety update reports for biologicals in Europe. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(5):433–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission. The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union Guidelines on pharmacovigilance for medicinal products for human use. [Homepage on the Internet]. https://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/pharmacovigilance_en (2012). Accessed 21 May 2018.

  3. Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Meyboom RH, Straus SM, Leufkens HG, Egberts TC. Mapping the safety profile of biologicals: a disproportionality analysis using the WHO adverse drug reaction database,VigiBase. Drug Saf. 2010;33(10):865–78. https://doi.org/10.2165/11538330-000000000-00000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. European Medicines Agency. Guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices. EMA/529641/2016. 15 August 2016. [Homepage on the Internet]. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2016/08/WC500211728.pdf (2016). Accessed 21 May 2018.

  5. Downing NS, Shah ND, Aminawung JA, Pease AM, Zeitoun JD, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by the food and drug administration between 2001 and 2010. JAMA. 2017;317(18):1854–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moorkens E, Jonker-Exler C, Huys I, Declerck P, Simoens S, Vulto AG. Overcoming -barriers to market access of biosimilars in the European Union: the case of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein K, Scholl J, Vermeer NS, Broekmans AW, Van Puijenbroek EP, De Bruin ML, Stolk P. Traceability of biologics in the Netherlands: an analysis of information-recording systems in clinical practice and spontaneous ADR reports. Drug Saf. 2016;39(2):185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauters T, Vandenbroucke J. Development of a flowchart for risk assessment and allocation of preparation of monoclonal antibodies. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155217743095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Claus BO, Bauters T, Somers A. Pharmacovigilance of biosimilars and other biologicals within the hospital: current practices and future challenges. GaBI J. 2017;6(1):24–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, Janecek E, Domecq C, Greenblatt DJ. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouvy JC, De Huinink L, Bruin ML. Benefit-risk reassessment of medicines: a retrospective analysis of all safety-related referral procedures in Europe during 2001–2012. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(9):1004–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Claus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Claus, B. Is pharmacovigilance of biologicals cost-effective?. Int J Clin Pharm 40, 787–789 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0695-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0695-8

Keywords

Navigation