Technology-induced errors associated with computerized provider order entry software for older patients
Background The introduction of new technologies in the prescribing process has seen the emergence of new types of medication errors. Objective To determine the prevalence and consequences of technology-induced prescription errors associated with a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system in hospitalized older patients. Setting Patients 65 years or older admitted to the Departments of Internal Medicine, General Surgery, and Vascular Surgery of a tertiary hospital. Method Prospective observational 6-month study. Technology-induced errors were classified according to various taxonomies. Interrater reliability was measured. Consequences were assessed by interviewing patients and healthcare providers and classified according to their severity. Main outcome measure Prevalence of technology-induced errors. Results A total of 117 patients were included and 107 technology-induced errors were recorded. The prevalence of these errors was 3.65%. Half of the errors were clinical errors (n = 54) and the majority of these were classified as wrong dose, wrong strength, or wrong formulation. Clinical errors were 9 times more likely to be more severe than procedural errors (14.8 vs 1.9%; OR 9.04, 95% CI 1.09–75.07). Most of the errors did not reach the patient. Almost all errors were related to human–machine interactions due to wrong (n = 61) or partial (n = 41) entries. Conclusion Technology-induced errors are common and intrinsic to the implementation of new technologies such as CPOE. The majority of errors appear to be related to human–machine interactions and are of low severity. Prospective trials should be conducted to analyse in detail the way these errors occur and to establish strategies to solve them and increase patient safety.
KeywordsAdverse drug reaction Computerized provider order entry CPOE Elderly Medical informatics Medication errors Medication safety User-computer interface
Conflicts of interest
Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, Ana María Álvarez Díaz, Teresa Gramage Caro, Noelia Vicente Oliveros, Eva Delgado Silveira, María Muñoz García, Alfonso José Cruz-Jentoft, and Teresa Bermejo-Vicedo declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 16.Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National hospital discharge survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010;(29):1–20, 24.Google Scholar
- 18.Solà Bonada N, Álvarez Díaz AM, Codina Jané C. The role of the Pharmacist in the design, development and implementation of medication prescription support systems. Farm Hosp. 2016;40(n06):57–476.Google Scholar
- 22.National Coordinating Council for Medication Error reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP). NCC MERP index for categorizing medication errors. 2017. http://www.nccmerp.org/.
- 36.Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés M, Delgado-Silveira E, Carretero-Accame ME, Bermejo-Vicedo T. Using healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to reduce medication errors in the process of drug prescription, validation and dispensing in hospitalised patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(1):42–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Westbrook JI, Baysari MT, Li L, Burke R, Richardson KL, Day RO. The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(6):1159–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar