Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Adverse drug–drug interactions (DDI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in susceptible populations. Cancer patients are a population at high risk for DDI especially because they commonly receive several drugs concomitantly. The knowledge about the most common interactions between drugs used in oncology inpatients is essential to reduce drug-related problems and increase the safety and efficacy of the therapy. Objective To assess the frequency of potential DDI throughout the hospital stay of cancer patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy, describe their epidemiology, and identify risk factors for major DDI. Setting An oncology–hematology inpatient unit of a public hospital in southern Brazil. Method Drug prescriptions were prospectively reviewed throughout the hospital stay of patients admitted for systemic chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were used for data analysis. Main outcome measure Potential DDI and their characteristics. Results The cohort consisted of 113 patients, who used a mean of 8.9 ± 2.7 drugs/day. All patients had at least one potential DDI (median, 7.0/patient; 25th–75th percentile, 3.5–12.0), and 46 % of the patients had at least one DDI classified as major, i.e. that it may result in death, hospitalization, permanent injury, or therapeutic failure. Only 13.7 % of all interactions involved antineoplastic agents, identified in 62.8 % of patients. Most interactions were of moderate severity, 6.4 % were major, and 8.5 % had a recommendation for therapy modification. Multivariate analysis revealed mean number of drugs prescribed [relative risk (RR) for each additional drug: 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.17; P < 0.01] and age ≥60 years (RR 1.48; 95 % CI 1.03–2.14; P < 0.01) as independent risk factors for major DDI. Conclusion Potential DDI were highly frequent in this cohort. Older age and number of drugs prescribed were more likely to lead to major interactions. Prospective surveillance is required to detect adverse DDI, aiming primarily at reducing the risk of toxicity or treatment failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartshorn EA. Drug interaction: 1. General considerations. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:116–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scripture CD, Figg WD. Drug interactions in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:546–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blower P, de Wit R, Goodin S, Aapro M. Drug–drug interactions in oncology: why are they important and can they be minimized? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55:117–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riechelmann RP, Moreira F, Smaletz O, Saad ED. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;56:286–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haddad A, Davis M, Lagman R. The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:251–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haidar C, Jeha S. Drug interactions in childhood cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:92–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riechelmann RP, Saad ED. A systematic review on drug interactions in oncology. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:704–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riechelmann RP, Zimmermann C, Chin SN, et al. Potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving supportive care exclusively. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2008;35:535–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L, Saad ED, Taback NA, Krzyzanowska MK. Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:592–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jansman FG, Reyners AK, van Roon EN, et al. Consensus-based evaluation of clinical significance and management of anticancer drug interactions. Clin Ther. 2011;33:305–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Riechelmann RP, Del Giglio A. Drug interactions in oncology: how common are they? Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1907–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voll ML, Yap KD, Terpstra WE, Crul M. Potential drug–drug interactions between anti-cancer agents and community pharmacy dispensed drugs. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:575–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Leeuwen RW, Swart EL, Boven E, Boom FA, Schuitenmaker MG, Hugtenburg JG. Potential drug interactions in cancer therapy: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadjibabaie M, Badri S, Ataei S, Moslehi AM, Karimzadeh I, Ghavamzadeh A. Potential drug–drug interactions at a referral hematology–oncology ward in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:1619–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lexi-Interact. http://webstore.lexi.com/Lexi-Interact. Accessed 1 Nov 2009.

  16. Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:380–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reis AM, Cassiani SH. Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:822–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbuhl S, Beer JH. Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:367–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V, et al. Potential medication problems in older newly diagnosed cancer patients in Canada during cancer treatment: a prospective pilot cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27:559–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McLeod HL. Clinically relevant drug–drug interactions in oncology. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;45:539–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Egger SS, Drewe J, Schlienger RG. Potential drug–drug interactions in the medication of medical patients at hospital discharge. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;58:773–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sokol KC, Knudsen JF, Li MM. Polypharmacy in older oncology patients and the need for an interdisciplinary approach to side-effect management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miranda V, Fede A, Nobuo M, et al. Adverse drug reactions and drug interactions as causes of hospital admission in oncology. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42:342–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Riechelmann RP. Drug combinations with the potential to interact among cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:1113–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peral Aguirregoitia J, Lertxundi Etxebarria U, Martínez Bengoechea MJ, Mora Atorrasagasti O, Franco Lamela E, Gabilondo Zelaia I. Prospective assessment of drug interactions in hospitalized patients using a computer programme. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:93–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Norton PG, Baker GR. Patient safety in cancer care: a time for action. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:579–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:955–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bremberg ER, Hising C, Nylén U, Ehrsson H, Eksborg S. An evaluation of pharmacist contribution to an oncology ward in a Swedish hospital. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2006;12:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cavero Rodrigo E, Climente Martí M, Navarro Fontestad MC, Jiménez Torres NV. Quality assessment of two pharmaceutical care models for oncohaematological patients. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The translation and submission of this article was supported by Glenmark Farmacêutica Ltda.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Stoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoll, P., Kopittke, L. Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pharm 37, 475–484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0083-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0083-6

Keywords

Navigation