Abstract
Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration is an important component of supportive therapy in chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Although patient response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration is known to vary, the factors responsible for poor response have not been identified. Objective To identify the predictors of the responses of patients with solid tumors to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Setting A 600-bed university hospital offering secondary and tertiary care in Japan. Methods This retrospective cohort study examined the response of 181 patients with solid tumors who were administered prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the first time after they developed severe grade 3/4 leukopenia (white blood cell count <2,000 × 10−9/L) because of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor response was defined as the length of the leukocyte recovery period, which was assessed as the period within which the normal white blood cell count (white blood cell count >3,000 × 10−9/L) is reached after the first dosage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. After classification of the patients as either poor or normal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor responders according to the confidence interval of the recovery period, their characteristics were compared. Main outcome measure The time for recovery to normal white blood cell count was 2–7 days (90 % confidence interval), and the cutoff value for differentiating poor responders (n = 14) from normal responders (n = 167) was 8 days. Univariate analysis identified previous radiotherapy, number of chemotherapy courses, high granulocyte colony-stimulating factor dosage, and hypoalbuminemia to be significantly associated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor response. Multivariate analysis identified undergoing four or more chemotherapy courses (odds ratio = 5.09; 95 % confidence interval, 1.14–22.71) and heart failure (odds ratio = 5.96; 95 % confidence interval, 1.09–32.57) to be significantly associated with poor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor response. Conclusions Undergoing four or more chemotherapy courses and heart failure are independent risk factors for poor response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. These findings may help prevent the complications of leukopenia during chemotherapy and highlight the need to develop better strategies for preventing and treating infectious disease in patients undergoing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lalami Y, Paesmans M, Muanza F, Barette M, Plehiers B, Dubreucq L, et al. Can we predict the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in febrile neutropenic patients, focusing on regimen-specific risk factors? A retrospective analysis. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:507–14.
Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3187–205.
Lyman GH. Guidelines of the national comprehensive cancer network on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy: a review of evidence. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2005;3:557–71.
Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, Dal Lago L, Donnelly JP, Kearney N, et al. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:8–32.
Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman GH. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3158–67.
Klastersky J, Awada A, Aoun M, Paesmans M. Should the indications for the use of myeloid growth factors for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients be extended? Curr Opin Oncol. 2009;21:297–302.
Fukuoka M, Masuda N, Negoro S, Matsui K, Yana T, Kudoh S, et al. CODE chemotherapy with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:306–9.
Ahn S, Lee YS, Chun YH, Kwon IH, Kim W, Lim KS, et al. Predictive factors of poor prognosis in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:1151–8.
National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v3.0. Available via http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf of subordinate document. Accessed Oct 2009.
Tu JV, Austin PC, Walld R, Roos L, Agras J, McDonald KM. Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:992–7.
Austin PC, Austin PC. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Stat. 2004;58:131–7.
Chang J, Geary CG, Testa NG. Long-term bone marrow damage after chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia does not improve with time. Br J Haematol. 1990;75:68–72.
Mauch P, Constine L, Greenberger J, Knospe W, Sullivan J, Liesveld JL, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1319–39.
Kell R, Haunstetter A, Dengler TJ, Zugck C, Kübler W, Haass M. Do cytokines enable risk stratification to be improved in NYHA functional class III patients? Comparison with other potential predictors of prognosis. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:70–8.
Parissis JT, Adamopoulos SN, Venetsanou KF, Karas SM, Kremastinos DT. Elevated plasma amylase levels in advanced chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: correlation with circulating interleukin-6 activity. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2003;23:329–33.
Parissis JT, Adamopoulos S, Venetsanou KF, Mentzikof DG, Karas SM, Kremastinos DT. Clinical and neurohormonal correlates of circulating granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in severe heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:707–10.
Jug B, Salobir BG, Vene N, Sebestjen M, Sabovic M, Keber I. Interleukin-6 is a stronger prognostic predictor than high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with chronic stable heart failure. Heart Vessels. 2009;24:271–6.
Nicola NA, Vadas MA, Lopez AF. Down-modulation of receptors for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on human neutrophils by granulocyte-activating agents. J Cell Physiol. 1986;128:501–9.
Khwaja A, Carver J, Jones HM, Paterson D, Linch DC. Expression and dynamic modulation of the human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor in immature and differentiated myeloid cells. Br J Haematol. 1993;85:254–9.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ohnaka, H., Tsukamoto, H., Nakamura, T. et al. Predictors of response of patients with solid tumors to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Int J Clin Pharm 35, 45–50 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9703-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9703-6