Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of consumers’ preferences and perceptions of oral solid dosage forms on their treatment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Beyond the direct pharmacological effect of medicines, preferences and perceptions toward a particular oral solid dosage form (OSDF) play a crucial role in recovery and may reduce adherence to the prescribed treatment. Objectives This study conducted to investigate the most preferred OSDF and the degree to which swallowing solid medication is an issue, to assess perceptions of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF, and to find predictors of the most preferred OSDF. Method A cross-sectional study, through convenience sample method, was conducted to survey consumers visiting community pharmacies in Baghdad, Iraq. Data was collected by selfadministered and pre-piloted questionnaires, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science. Multiple logistic regression analysis and Chi-square tests were used at alpha level = 0.05. Results A total of 1,000 questionnaire were included in the analysis. Of all respondents, 52.9 % preferred capsule among other OSDF and this preference varied significantly with a number of socio-demographic factors. Ease of swallowing solid medication was the main issue which resulted in preferences for a particular form. A negative perception of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF was found among 89.1 % of the consumers. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that gender, ease of swallowing, and perceptions of the therapeutic benefits of the OSDF were significant predictors of capsule preferences. Conclusions Given the fact that consumers are the end users of medicines and their preferences may influence response to the treatment, efforts are worthwhile by the prescribers and medicines’ manufactures to understand consumers’ preferences of a particular dosage form in order to achieve successful therapy outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckalew L, Sallis R. Patient compliance and medication perception. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckalew L, Ross S. Medication property effects on expectations of action. Drug Dev Res. 1991;23:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reisenwitz T, Wimbish G. Over the counter pharmaceuticals: exploratory research of consumers preferences toward solid oral dosage forms. Health Mark Q. 1996;13:47–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Shammari A, Khoja T, Al-Yamani J. Compliance with short-term antibiotic therapy among patients attending primary health centres in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J R Soc Health. 1995;115:231–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hey H, Jorgenson F, Sorensen K, Wamberg T. Oesophageal transit of six commonly used tablet and capsules. Br Med J. 1982;285:1717–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brotherman D, Bayraktaroglu T, Garofalo R. Comparison of ease of swallowing of dietary supplements products for age- related eye diseases. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:587–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones W, Francis J. Soft gels: consumers perceptions and market impact relative to other oral dosage forms. Adv Ther. 2000;17:213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brieger W, Salami K, Pshiname F. Perception of drug color among drug sellers and consumers in rural south western Nigeria. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007;3:303–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhosle M, Benner J, DeKoven M, Shelton J. Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carnaby-Mann G, Crary M. Pill swallowing by adults with dysphagia. Arch Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 1970;131:970–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Overgaard A, Hojsted J, Hansen R. Moller- Sonnergaard J, Christrup L. Patients’ evaluation of shape, size, and color of solid dosage forms. Pharm World Sci. 2001;23:185–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Daher A, Amin F. Assessing the perceptions of a biostatistics and epidemiology module: view of year 2 medical students from a Malaysian university. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckalew L, Coffield K. An investigation of drug expectancy as a function of capsule color and size and preparation form. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982;2:245–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the pharmacists who allowed the researchers to interview consumers at their own pharmacies in Baghdad. Further, we would like to thank all the participants for their time to complete the questionnaires.

Funding

None

Conflicts of interest

The authors of this study have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inas Rifaat Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, I.R., Ibrahim, M.I.M. & Al-Haddad, M.S. The influence of consumers’ preferences and perceptions of oral solid dosage forms on their treatment. Int J Clin Pharm 34, 728–732 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9667-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9667-6

Keywords

Navigation