International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 974–984 | Cite as

A comparative pilot study of the professional ethical thinking of Quebec pharmacy residents and French pharmacy interns

  • Karin Scharr
  • Jean-François BussièresEmail author
  • Sonia Prot-Labarthe
  • Olivier Bourdon
Research Article


Objective The main objective of this pilot study is to compare the professional ethical thinking of Quebec pharmacy residents and French pharmacy interns. The secondary objective is to compare the professional ethical thinking of Quebec pharmacy residents and first year French pharmacy interns. Setting Hospital pharmacy residents from Quebec, Canada and pharmacy interns from France. Methods This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, web-based survey. Main outcome measure For this study, professional ethical thinking was defined as the level of agreement/disagreement with statements about pharmacy ethics/dilemmas. Results A total of 208 usable questionnaires were completed (response rate 91% in Quebec and 11% in France). There were no significant differences between Quebec residents and French interns for 29/43 items (67%). However, there were significant differences in their level of agreement with 14/43 items (33%) surveyed by our questionnaire. The differences related to the following themes: economic aspects (four statements), pharmaceutical care, code of ethics, evaluation, clinical research (two statements each) and training and education, dispensing medications (one statement each). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of exposure to ethics during academic training and experiential practice. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups of first year pharmacy respondents for 11 statements (26%), with only two out of 11 statements being different from those reported in the overall comparison. Conclusion Published data on the professional ethical thinking of pharmacy residents and interns remain limited. We believe the higher exposure of Quebec residents to ethics during academic courses and experiential/practical training may have contributed to a higher level of agreement with some ethical statements.


Canada Ethics France Pharmacy practice Pharmacy intern Pharmacy resident Quebec 




Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Teagarden JF. Clinical bioethics in pharmacy practice. Pharmacotherapy self-assesssment program. 5th ed. American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2007 Available from
  2. 2.
    The free dictionary. Hippocratic Oath. 2011. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2001.
  3. 3.
    American Medical Association. History of AMA ethics. 2011. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2011.
  4. 4.
    Pray WS. Ethical, scientific, and educational concerns with unproven medications. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(6):141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry M. Canadian pharmacy law, vol. I–I. Aurora, ON: Aurora Professional Press—Canada Law Book; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wingfield J, Bissell P, Anderson C. The Scope of pharmacy ethics—an evaluation of the international research literature, 1990–2002. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2383–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Latif DA. The link between moral reasoning scores, social desirability, and patient care performance scores: empirical evidence from retail pharmacy setting. J Bus Ethics. 2000;25:255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper RJ, Bissell P, Wingfield J. A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(2):82–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elm DR, Weber J. Measuring moral judgment: the moral judgment interview or the defining issues test? J Bus Ethics. 1994;13:341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaar BB. Professional ethics in pharmacy practice/developing a psychometric measure of moral reasoning. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(4):439–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prot-Labarthe S, Pelletier E, Winterfeld U, Bourdon O, Villeneuve E, Wood C, Bussières JF, Brion F. Comparison of pain management in paediatric surgical patients in two hospitals in France and Canada. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(3):251–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prot S, Lavoie A, Bourdon O, Lebel D, Bussières JF, Faye A, Brion F. Pilot study about pharmaceutical care implantation in a general paediatric unit in a French hospital. France-Québec collaboration and comparison. Arch Pediatr. 2007;14(4):345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prot-Labarthe S, Bussières JF, Barret P, Bourdon O, Brion F. Lack of commercial oral drug formulations for children in two hospital group purchasing agreements in France and Canada. Int J Pharm Compd. 2008;12(4):365–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prot-Labarthe S, Bussières JF, Brion F, Bourdon O. Comparison of hospital pharmacy practice in France and Canada: can different practice perspectives complement each other? Pharm World Sci. 2007;29(5):526–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bussières JF, Roy P, Lebel D, Binette MC, Cambar J, Colombel C. Pratique pharmaceutique en France et au Québec: perspectives d’échange ? J Pharm Clin. 2002;21:9–13.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conseils scientifiques des concours d’internat (CNCI). 2008. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2011.
  17. 17.
    Latif DA. Assessing the moral reasoning of American pharmacy students. Pharm Educ. 2002;2(4):177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Latif DA. An assessment of ethical reasoning of US Pharmacy students: a national study. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(2):1–10.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec. Relations commerciales entre médecins et pharmaciens: l’Ordre des pharmaciens réagit à l’Avis de l’Office des professions. 2005. Available from Cited 17 Oct 2005.
  20. 20.
    Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec. Publication relative à l’éthique professionnelle dans les relations commerciales avec les résidences de personnes âgées. Rapport annuel 2006–2007. 2007. Available from Cited 15 June 2007.
  21. 21.
    Poulin A. Saga des ristournes accordées aux pharmaciens : le syndic peut enquêter auprès de tiers. 2007. Available from Cited 26 Jan 2007.
  22. 22.
    Assemblée nationale du Québec. Journal des débats. 2007. Available from Cited 6 Nov 2007.
  23. 23.
    Can LII. Code de déontologie des médecins. R.Q. c. M-9, r. 4.1. 2011. Available from Cited 28 Feb 2011.
  24. 24.
    Publications Québec. Code de déontologie des pharmaciens. Art. 26. Available from (visited June 1st 2010). 23 Feb 2011.
  25. 25.
    Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies. 2010. Available from Cited 31 Dec 2010.
  26. 26.
    Ordre national des pharmaciens. Code de déontologie des pharmaciens. 2009. Available from Cited 31 Dec 2009.
  27. 27.
    Monaghan MS, Galt KA, Turner PD, Houghton BL, Rich EC, Markert RJ, Bergman-Evans B. Student understanding of the relationship between the health professions and the pharmaceutical industry. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(1):14–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piascik P, Bernard D, Madhavan S, Sorensen TD, Stoner SC, TenHoeve T. Gifts and corporate influence in doctor of pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(4):68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Latif DA. Ethical cognition and selection-socialization in retail pharmacy. J Bus Ethics. 2000;25(4):343–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashker S, Burkiewicz JS. Pharmacy residents’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry promotion. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(16):1724–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Google—Netting the evidence. 2011. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2011.
  32. 32.
    Université de Montréal. Faculté de pharmacie. Doctorat professionnel en pharmacie. 2011. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2011.
  33. 33.
    Health Canada. Baseline natural health products survey among consumers. 2005 Mar. Available from Cited 31 May 2010.
  34. 34.
    PasseportSanté.Net. Homéopathie. 2011. Available from Cited 23 Feb 2011.
  35. 35.
    Wills S, Brown D, Astbury S. A survey of ethical issues surrounding supply of information to members of the public by hospital pharmacy medicines information centres. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24(2):55–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Johnson T, Boon H. Where does homeopathy fit in pharmacy practice? Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(1):7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Privatisation du respect de la Convention Européenne des droits de l’homme: faut-il reconnaître un effet horizontal généralisé ? 2007. Available from Cited 30 Mar 2007.
  38. 38.
    Santé-Médecine.Net. La contraception d’urgence: la pilule du lendemain. 2009. Available from Cited 18 Jul 2009.
  39. 39.
    Latif DA. An assessment of the level of moral development of American and Canadian pharmacy students. Int J Pharm Pract. 2004;68(2):1–10.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Latif DA. The relationship between ethical dilemma discussion and moral development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:126–33.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bumgarner GW, Spies AR, Asbill CS, Prince VT. Using the humanities to strengthen the concept of professionalism among first-professional year pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(2):28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karin Scharr
    • 1
  • Jean-François Bussières
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Sonia Prot-Labarthe
    • 4
    • 5
  • Olivier Bourdon
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Unité de recherche en pratique pharmaceutiqueCHU Sainte-JustineMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Unité de recherche en pratique pharmaceutique, Département de PharmacieCHU Sainte-JustineMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Faculté de PharmacieUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.APHP, Hôpital Robert-DebréParisFrance
  5. 5.Université Paris DescartesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations