Abstract
Aim To examine physicians’ use and views of various sources for general drug information and to determine the kind of drug-related questions they receive. Method An online survey of general practitioners who were Singapore Medical Association members was conducted. The survey consisted of questions about the physicians’ demographics, the drug information source they used most often, their opinions on the information from that source, and the types of drug-related questions they received from patients. Results Among the 236 physicians who responded to the survey, 58.1% used reference texts most frequently; of these respondents, 80.3% used the Monthly Index of Medical Specialties. Only 4.2% most often go to pharmacists for drug information. Of the 75 (31.8%) respondents who chose online sources, about half used Google while the remainder used specific websites. Most respondents rated drug information from reference texts as somewhat comprehensive (71.5%) and usually reliable (81.8%). The choice of drug information sources was associated with physicians’ age, place of practice, access to the Internet, and clinical experience (P < 0.05). The types of drug-related questions that physicians most frequently received were with regards to adverse drug reactions (76.3%), drug costs (36.4%), and drug use during pregnancy or lactation (34.3%). Conclusion Most physicians in Singapore search for general drug information using reference texts and consider them to be comprehensive and reliable. Questions pertaining to adverse drug reactions were the drug-related questions physicians most frequently receive. It is important for physicians to have appropriate drug information references and learn methods with which to verify the credibility of drug information obtained from the Internet. Pharmacists can also work to improve their role as providers of drug information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Tajir GK, Kelly WN. Epidemiology, comparative methods of detection, and preventability of adverse drug events. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1169–74.
Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1999. ISBN:0309068371.
Phillips DP, Christenfeld N, Glynn LM. Increase in US medication-error deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet. 1998;351:643–4.
von Laue NC, Schwappach DL, Koeck CM. The epidemiology of preventable adverse drug events: a review of the literature. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003;115:407–15.
Singapore Medical Council annual report 2008. Singapore: Singapore Medical Council, 2008. http://www.smc.gov.sg/html/MungoBlobs/515/148/SMC%20Annual%20Report%202008%20(Final%20Printed%20Version).pdf. (Accessed December 2010).
Vidal L, Shavit M, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L. Systematic comparison of four sources of drug information regarding adjustment of dose for renal function. BMJ. 2005;331:263.
Abarca J, Malone DC, Armstrong EP, et al. Concordance of severity ratings provided in four drug interaction compendia. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:136–41.
Vitry AI. Comparative assessment of four drug interaction compendia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:709–14.
Fulda TR, Valuck RJ, Zanden JV. Disagreement among drug compendia on inclusion and ratings of drug–drug interactions. Curr Ther Res. 2000;61:540–8.
Hatfield CL, May SK, Markoff JS. Quality of consumer drug information provided by four web sites. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:2308–11.
Franke L, Avery AJ, Groom L, Horsfield P. Is there a role for computerized decision support for drug dosing in general practice? A questionnaire survey. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000;25:373–7.
Hull FM, Marshall T. Sources of information about new drugs and attitudes towards drug prescribing: an international study of differences between primary care physicians. Fam Pract. 1987;4:123–8.
McGettigan P, Golden J, Fryer J, Chan R, Feely J. Prescribers prefer people: the sources of information used by doctors for prescribing suggest that the medium is more important than the message. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:184–9.
Peay MY, Peay ER. Differences among practitioners in patterns of preference for information sources in the adoption of new drugs. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18:1019–25.
Peay MY, Peay ER. Patterns of preference for information sources in the adoption of new drugs by specialists. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:467–76.
Layton MR, Sritanyarat W, Chadbunchachai S, Wertheimer AI. Sources of information for new drugs among physicians in Thailand. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:619–27.
Ponampalam R, Anantharaman V. The need for drug and poison information—the Singapore physicians’ perspective. Singapore Med J. 2003;44:231–42.
Bennett NL, Casebeer LL, Kristofco R, Collins BC. Family physicians’ information seeking behaviors: a survey comparison with other specialties. BioMed Central. 2005;5:1–5.
Wong PSJ, Ko Y, Sklar GE. A survey of pharmacists in Singapore to identify and evaluate commonly-used drug information sources. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:347–52.
Monthly Index of Medical Specialties (MIMS) Singapore. http://www.mims.com.sg. (Accessed 2011 Feb 12).
Ho CH, Ko Y, Tan ML. Patient needs and sources of drug information in Singapore: is the internet replacing former sources? Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:732–9.
URAC’s Health Web Site and Health Content Vendor Accreditation Programs. http://www.urac.org/programs/prog_accred_HWS_po.aspx. (Accessed 2010 Dec 12).
HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites.www.hon.ch/HONcode. (Accessed 2010 Dec 12).
List of registered medical practitioners for 2007. Supplement to the Republic of Singapore Government Gazette. Singapore National Printers Corporation Ltd (SNP), 2007.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the physicians who responded to the survey and the Singapore Medical Association for distributing the survey.
Funding
None.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lua, HL., Sklar, G. & Ko, Y. Identification and physicians’ views of their commonly-used drug information sources in Singapore. Int J Clin Pharm 33, 772–778 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9533-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9533-y