Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development of the Self-Medicating Scale (SMS): a scale to measure people’s beliefs about self-medication

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective We describe the development of a reliable and valid measure of people’s beliefs about self-medication. To achieve this, student self-medication beliefs and behaviours in response to acute pain were investigated. Specific objectives were to establish the internal reliability plus content and construct validity of this scale. Method The nine item ‘Self-Medicating Scale (SMS)’ was developed following one to one interviews conducted with a purposive sample of 10 lay people in 2001 to explore their self-medicating beliefs and behaviour. The SMS was completed by 304 undergraduate pharmacy students in March 2006, along with measures of self-reported over the counter (OTC) analgesic use, pain severity and other non-pharmacological methods of pain relief, using a cross-sectional design. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on SMS items using Maximum Likelihood extraction and Varimax rotation. Main outcome measure Factor structure of the SMS and relationships between SMS scales and medication-taking behaviour. Results Factor analysis of the SMS revealed three factor structures which were named ‘Reluctance’, ‘Don’t think twice’ and ‘Run its course’ (each three item scales with good Cronbach’s alpha 0.82, 0.77 and 0.75 respectively). Of the 304 respondents, 93% reported having experienced pain over the past month and nearly three quarters of these indicated that they had self-medicated with OTC analgesics (mean 10.8 doses). Statistically significant differences or associations were found in all three SMS scores and each of the main outcome variables i.e. whether or not analgesics were taken, number of doses of OTC analgesics taken and number of non-pharmacological remedies tried. Conclusions These results show that the SMS possesses good internal reliability, plus good content and construct validity indicating that it is a useful measure of self-medication beliefs. More work is needed to extend these findings to the wider general public and with other OTC medications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Wanless Report. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. 2002. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/Consultations_and_Legislation/wanless/consult_wanless_final.cfm. Accessed 17 Jan 2008.

  2. Porteous T, Bond C, Hannaford P, Sinclair H. How and why are non-prescription analgesics used in Scotland? Fam Pract. 2005;22:78–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wazaify M, Shields E, Hughes C, McElnay J. Societal perspectives on over the counter (OTC) medicines. Fam Pract. 2005;22:170–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammond T, Clatworthy J, Horne R. Patients’ use of GPs and community pharmacists in minor illness: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Fam Pract. 2004;21:146–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R. The Illness Perception Questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol Health. 1996;11:431–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petrie KJ, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Role of patients’ views of their illness in predicting return to work and function after MI. Br Med J. 1996;312:1191–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horne R, Weinman J. Patient’s beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res. 1999;47:555–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horne R, Graupner L, Frost S, Weinman J, Wright M, Hankins M. Medicine in a multicultural society: the effect of cultural background on beliefs about medications. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paulose-Ram R, Hirsch R, Dillon C, Gu Q. Frequent monthly use of selected non-prescription and prescription non-narcotic analgesics among US adults. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott FV, Fraser MI. Use and abuse of over-the-counter analgesic agents. J Psychiatr Neurosci. 1998;23:13–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonov K, Isacson D. Prescription and non-prescription analgesic use in Sweden. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:485–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roumie CL, Griffin MR. Over-the-counter analgesics in older adults. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:485–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turunen J, Mantyselka P, Kumpusalo E, Ahonen R. How do people ease their pain? A population-based study. J Pain. 2004;5:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly E. Measuring patients’ preferred self-management approaches to minor illness. University of Brighton, MPharm project, April 2001.

  15. French DP, James DH. Reasons for the use of mild analgesics among English students. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(1):79–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrari A, Stefani M, Sternieri S, Bertolotti M, Sternieri E. Analgesic drug taking: beliefs and behaviour among headache patients. Headache. 1997;37:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blenkinsopp A, Bond C. Over-the-counter medication. London: British Medical Association; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Isacson D, Bingefors K. Epidemiology of analgesic use: a gender perspective. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2002;26:5–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bingefors K, Isacson D. Epidemiology, co-morbidity and impact on health related quality of life or self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain—a gender perspective. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(5):435–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hannah L. Predictors of use of mild analgesics in a student population. Cardiff University, MPharm project, May 2006.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data for this study were collected by Laura Hannah for her dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of her MPharm degree, Cardiff University (2006). The developmental work for the scale was undertaken by Emily Kelly for her dissertation as part requirement for her MPharm degree, University of Brighton (2001).

Financial support for the study

None.

Possible conflicts of interests

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delyth H. James.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, D.H., French, D.P. The development of the Self-Medicating Scale (SMS): a scale to measure people’s beliefs about self-medication. Pharm World Sci 30, 794–800 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-008-9227-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-008-9227-2

Keywords

Navigation