Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 400–403 | Cite as

Mifepristone in Italy: the case of a drug trapped between ethics and clinical practice

  • Roberto Banfi
  • Eleonora Pavone
  • Rita Cerri
  • Monica Menichetti
Original Paper
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

In Italy mifepristone is not yet marketed. Gynaecologists in our hospital asked to use this medication as a less traumatic method for voluntary abortions. We followed the standard procedure defined by the Italian Health Ministry (IMH) for purchasing drugs from abroad but encountered several unexpected barriers. Starting from this case, this paper is aimed at identifying these barriers which we found to be not only professional, but also ethical, religious and moral.

Keywords

Abortion Contraception Ethics Italy Mifeprosone Politics Religion Social pharmacy 

References:

  1. 1.
    Hooper J. Row over pill may see pro-life activists in Italy’s abortion clinics. The Guardian 2005; November 16. http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1643503,00.html.
  2. 2.
    Burgermeister J. Italian doctors defy restrictions on abortion pill. BMJ 2006; 332:444–45. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/332/7539/444-c.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovacs L, Sas M, Resch BA, Ugocsai G, Swahn ML, Bygdeman M, Rowe PJ. Termination of very early pregnancy by RU 486, an antiprogestational compound. Contraception 1984; 29(5):399–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arisi E. Changing attitudes towards abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003; 8(2):109–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller AM. Uneasy promises: sexuality, health, and human rights. Am J Public Health 2001; 91(6):861–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen-Kettenis PT, Dillen CM, Gooren LJ. Treatment of young transsexuals in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000; 144(15):698–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montastruc JL. Social pharmacology: a new topic in clinical pharmacology. Therapie 2002; 57(5):420–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Schmidt KW. The concealed and the revealed: bioethical issues in Europe at the end of second millennium. J Med Philos 2000; 25(2):123–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinstein BD. Do the Pharmacists have a right to refuse to fill prescriptions for abortifacient drugs? Law Med Health Care 1992; 20(3):220–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hisel LM. Catholicism and abortion since Roe v. Wade.Conscience 1998; 18(4):5–12.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giannetti V. Pharmacists’ beliefs about abortion and RU-486. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 1996; NS36(12):698–703.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Querido M. What are conscience clauses, and how do they affect a woman’s right to choose? Reprod Freedom News 1998; 7(7):2–3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gazzaniga MS. The ethical brain. New York-Washington: Dana Press 2005. ISBN 1-932594-01-9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flower R. Lifestyle drugs: pharmacology and the social agenda. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004; 25(4):182–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Banfi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eleonora Pavone
    • 1
  • Rita Cerri
    • 3
  • Monica Menichetti
    • 3
  1. 1.Pharmacy DepartmentAzienda USL11 EmpoliTuscanyItaly
  2. 2.Regional Ethic Committee of TuscanyTuscanyItaly
  3. 3.Obstetrics and Gynaecologic DepartmentAzienda USL11 EmpoliTuscanyItaly

Personalised recommendations