Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementation of a pharmaceutical care service: prescriptionists’, pharmacists’ and doctors’ views

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To identify prescriptionists’, pharmacists’ and doctors’ perceptions and experiences of a pharmaceutical care service supported by patient medication records (PMRs).

Method

Qualitative study employing focus group interviews with 16 prescriptionists and five pharmacists, and semi structured telephone interviews with 11 doctors.

Main outcome measures

Prescriptionists’, pharmacists’ and doctors’ views, experiences and perceptions of a pharmaceutical care service on Swedish community pharmacies.

Results

The provision of pharmaceutical care aided by PMRs had a positive influence on the prescriptionists’ and pharmacists’ daily work, and on their view of their professional role. They assumed greater professional responsibility, and described greater use of their pharmaceutical knowledge, greater confidence in practice and an increased awareness of their counselling role. They appreciated that the pharmaceutical care service provided an over-all picture of patients’ drug use, allowed for follow-up on counselling and made the prescriptionists’ and pharmacists’ competence tangible for patients. Perceived problems with the pharmaceutical care service included being time-consuming, record keeping being difficult, difficulty in getting understanding/support from colleagues and managers, and difficulty involving doctors. The majority of the doctors reported that they had not taken an active interest in the project, and their opinions of the pharmaceutical care service varied.

Conclusion

When prescriptionists and pharmacists apply the pharmaceutical care concept and work with PMRs, the patients are more likely to meet confident professionals that are more aware of the individual behind the drug therapy. This will hopefully contribute to informed, motivated medicine users that feel secure in their interactions with their pharmacy and receive, not only drugs, but treatment support. For such a service to be effective, however, it is vital to ensure that the doctors are fully co-operative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rossing C, Hansen EH, Krass I, Traulsen JM. Pharmaceutical care in Denmark: perceived importance of medicine-related problems and participation in postgraduate training. Pharm World Sci 2003;25(2):73–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beney J, Bero LA, Bond C. Expanding the roles of outpatient pharmacists: effects on health services utilization, costs, and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst 2000; Rev DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000336

  3. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362(9391):1225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farris KB, Schopflocher DP. Between intention and behavior: an application of community pharmacists’ assessment of pharmaceutical care. Soc Sci Med 1999;49(1):55–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Assa M, Frenzel Shepherd E. Interpersonal perception: a theory and method for studying pharmacists’ and patients’ views of pharmaceutical care. J Am Pharm Assoc 2000;40(1):71–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunlop JA, Shaw JP. Community pharmacists’ perspectives on pharmaceutical care implementation in New Zealand. Pharm World Sci 2002;24(6):224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell HM, McElnay JC, Hughes CM, Woods A. A qualitative investigation of the attitudes and opinions of community pharmacists to pharmaceutical care. J Soc Adm Pharm 1998;15(4):284–95.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ranelli PL, Biss J. Physicians’ perceptions of communication with and responsibilities of pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc 2000;40(5):625–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradshaw SJ, Doucette WR. Community pharmacists as patient advocates: physician attitudes. J Am Pharm Assoc 1998;38(5):598–602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith WE, Ray MD, Shannon DM. Physicians’ expectations of pharmacists. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2002;59(1):50–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brock KA, Doucette WR. Collaborative working relationships between pharmacists and physicians: an explanatory study. J Am Pharm Assoc 2004;44(3):358–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muijrers PEM, Knottnerus JA, Sijbrandij J, Janknegt R, Grol RPTM. Pharmacists in primary care. Pharm World Sci 2004;26(5):256–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nørgaard LS, Sørensen EW, Morgall JM. Social constructivist analysis of a patient medication record experiment – Why a good idea and good intentions are not enough. Int J Pharm Pract 2000;8:237–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westerlund LOT, Björk HT. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in Sweden. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40(6):1162–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Moreley PC. Pharmaceutical care practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. ISBN 0–07-136259-2

  16. Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve healtch. April 2000.

  17. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1997. ISBN 0-7619-0343-7.

  18. Richards L. Using NVivo in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif, London: Sage; 1999. ISBN 0-7619-6525-4.

  19. Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs 1998;28(2):345–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrier R, Boyce R. Why aren’t more pharmacists counseling? Am Pharm 1994; NS34(11):22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jarvis P. Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Educ Today 1992;12(3):174–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kansanaho H, Cordina M, Puumalainen I, Airaksinen M. Practicing pharmacists’ patient counseling skills in the context of reflectivity. Pharm Educ 2005;5(1):19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Renberg T, Ketttis Lindblad Å, Tully MP. Exploring subjective outcomes perceived by patients receiving a pharmaceutical care service. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2006;2(2):212–31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Kam WJ, Meyboom de Jong B, Tromp ThFJ, Moorman PW, van der Lei J. Effects of electronic communication between the GP and the pharmacist. The quality of medication data on admission and after discharge. Fam Pract 2001;18(6):605–09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing change: an overview. JAMIA 2000;7(2):116–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(23):iii–157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grainger-Rousseau TJ, Miralles MA, Hepler CD, Segal R, Doty RE, Ben-Joseph R. Therapeutic moutcomes monitoring: application of pharmaceutical care guidelines to community pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc 1997;NS37(6):647–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Michie S, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. “Psychological Theory” group. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evicence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14(1):26–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the prescriptionists, pharmacists and the doctors who were willing to discuss and answer our questions. This study was funded by Apoteket AB.

Possible conflicts of interest: Three of the authors (A.M., S.K.S., M.H.) are employed by Apoteket AB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Anna T. Montgomery, Mary P. Tully & Åsa Kettis-Lindblad

  2. Apoteket AB, Stockholm, SE-118 81, Sweden

    Anna T. Montgomery, Sofia Kälvemark-Sporrong & Mari Henning

  3. School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Mary P. Tully

Authors
  1. Anna T. Montgomery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sofia Kälvemark-Sporrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mari Henning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary P. Tully
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Åsa Kettis-Lindblad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna T. Montgomery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montgomery, A.T., Kälvemark-Sporrong, S., Henning, M. et al. Implementation of a pharmaceutical care service: prescriptionists’, pharmacists’ and doctors’ views. Pharm World Sci 29, 593–602 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9072-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9072-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation