Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refill non-adherence to repeat prescriptions leads to treatment gaps or to high extra costs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To determine the nature and extent of undersupply and the economic consequences of oversupply of medication among non-adherent patients. Methods: This study used copies of repeat prescriptions (=multiple dispensations), collected during 1 week in 2002 at 16 Swedish community pharmacies. For patients with a refill adherence below 80%, treatment gaps were defined as the number of days they had no drug available. The cost of drug oversupply (i.e., refill adherence >120%) was calculated from the prices of the drug packages dispensed. Results: The number of collected repeat prescriptions was 3,636. The median of treatment gaps among patients with a refill adherence below 80% was 53 days per 90–100 days treatment period and the corresponding median for oversupply was 40 days. The cost of oversupply for exempt patients (i.e., patients who have paid 1,800 SEK (€ 196; US$ 243) per year for medicines) was 32,000 SEK (€ 3,500; US$ 4,300) higher than for non-exempt patients. An extrapolation to all Sweden indicates that exemption from charges leads to an additional oversupply of about 142 million SEK (€15 million; US$ 19 million) per year above that of non-exempt patients. Conclusion: Both undersupply and oversupply of prescribed medicines are common in Sweden. Patients with a refill adherence below 80% seem to have less than half of the prescribed treatment available. Oversupply or drug stockpiling occurs more frequently among exempt than among non-exempt patients, and this oversupply leads to high unnecessary costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. World Health Organization, Geneva. ISBN 924 154599 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson K, Melander A, Svensson C, Lind O, Nilsson JLG Repeat prescriptions — refill adherence in relation to patient and prescriber characteristics, reimbursement level and type of medication. Eur J Public Health 2005 Dec; 15(6):621–626

  3. Steiner JF and Prochazka AV (1997). The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackevicius CA, Mamdani M and Tu JV (2002). Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 288(4): 462–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei L, Wang J, Thompson P, Wong S, Struthers AD and MacDonald TM (2002). Adherence to statin treatment and readmission of patients after myocardial infarction: a six year follow-up study. Heart 88: 229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morningstar BA, Sketris IS, Kephart GC and Sclar DA (2002). Variation in pharmacy prescription refill adherence measures by type of oral antihyperglycaemic drug therapy in seniors in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Clin Pharm Ther 27: 213–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mojtabai R, Lavelle J, Gibson PJ, Sohler NL, Craig TJ and Carlson GA (2002). Gaps in use of antipsychotics after discharge by first-admission patients with schizophrenia, 1989 to 1996. Psychiatr Serv 53: 337–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hylan TR, Dunn RL, Tepner RG and Meurgey F (1998). Gaps in antidepressant prescribing in primary care in the United Kingdom. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 13(6): 235–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudd P, Ramesh J, Bryant-Kosling C and Guerrero D (1993). Gaps in cardiovascular medication taking: the tip of the iceberg. J Gen Intern Med 8(12): 659–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haynes RB, Montague P, Oliver T, McKibbon KA, Brouwers MC, Kanani R (2001) Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, Oxford: Update Software

  11. Heaton PC, Cluxton RJ and Moomaw CJ (2003). Acetaminophen oversupply in the Ohio medicaid population. J Am Pharm Assoc 43: 680–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frediani F, Cannata AP, Magnoni A, Peccarisi C and Bussone G (2003). The patients with medication oversupply: clinical management problems. Neurol Sci 24(Suppl 2): 108–111

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noyce PR, Huttin C, Atella V, Brenner G, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM and Hedvall M-B (2000). The cost of prescription medicines to patients. Health Policy 52: 129–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. LIF (Läkemedelsindustriföreningen), Fakta (2004) Pharmaceutical market and healthcare. LIF, Stockholm

  15. Schafheutle EI, Hassell K, Noyce PR and Weiss MC (2002). Access to medicines: cost as an influence on the views and behaviour of patients. Health Soc Care Commun 10: 187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien B (1989). The effect of patient charges on the utilisation of prescription medicines. J Health Econ 8(1): 109–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson D and Borgquist L (1998). Effect of user charges on the use of prescription medicines in different socio-economic groups. Health Policy 44: 123–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Westerlund T, Almarsdóttir AB and Melander A (1999). Drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions in community practice. Int J Pharm Pract 7: 40–50

    Google Scholar 

  19. (1997) Medical products agency, Vol. 10, §37–38. Sweden LVFS, Uppsala. ISSN 1101–5225

  20. Al-Saffar N, Deshmukh A, Eid S and Carter P (2003). Health beliefs and drug compliance of depressed patients in Kuwait. J Soc Adm Pharm 20: 142–150

    Google Scholar 

  21. Apoteket AB (2002) Annual report, p. 42. Apoteket AB, Stockholm

  22. Morris LS and Schulz RM (1992). Patient compliance — an overview. J Clin Pharm Therap 17: 283–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. George CF, Peveler RC, Heiliger S and Thompson C (2000). Compliance with tricyclic antidepressants: the value of four different methods of assessment. Br J Clin Pharm 50: 166–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Casado JL, Sabido R, Perez-Elias MJ, Antela A, Oliva J and Dronda F (1999). Percentage of adherence correlates with the risk of protease inhibitor (PI) treatment failure in HIV-infected patients. Antivir Ther 4(3): 157–161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Information obtained from the drug statistics database of Apoteket AB, Stockholm

  26. Isacson D and Olofsson C (1999). Drugs up in smoke: a study of caseated drugs in Sweden. Pharm World Sci 21(2): 96–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ekedahl A, Wergeman L and Rydberg T (2003). Unused drugs in Sweden measured by returns to pharmacies. J Soc Adm Pharm 20: 26–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lars G. Nilsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krigsman, K., Melander, A., Carlsten, A. et al. Refill non-adherence to repeat prescriptions leads to treatment gaps or to high extra costs. Pharm World Sci 29, 19–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-4797-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-4797-8

Key words

Navigation