Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 10, pp 603–605 | Cite as

Studies of total ash and moisture in fresh Echinacea purpurea herb

  • V. B. Zagumennikov
  • E. Yu. Babaeva
  • A. L. Petrova
  • I. P. Malakhova
MEDICINAL PLANTS
  • 123 Downloads

Among the immunomodulators of plant origin, a number of very popular formations are prepared from the purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea Moench.). One type of medicinal plant material prepared from Echinacea purpurea is the fresh herb. The total ash and moisture contents of fresh Echinacea purpurea herb were studied in relation to structures of the above-ground part and the age of the plants harvested over two years. The leaves and inflorescences were found to be the parts of fresh Echinacea purpurea herb with the highest moisture contents, i.e., 75% and 78% respectively. Total ash content in the fresh herb was about 3%, with the maximum quantities found in stems.

Keywords

Echinacea purpurea moisture total ash fresh herb 

References

  1. 1.
    V. A. Kurkin, A. S. Akushskaya, E. V. Avdeeva, et al., Khimiya Rastit. Syr’ya, No. 4, 87 – 89 (2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. S. Uteshev, Current Questions in Immunopharmacology [in Russian], Moscow (1987), pp. 60 – 70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. N. Vzorova, Author’s Abstract of Master’s Thesis in Biological Sciences, Moscow (2002).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. V. Petrov, Immunology [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. C. Chelova, Author’s Abstract of Master’s Thesis in Biological Sciences, Pyatigorsk (2004).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Stikhin, T. A. Senina, E. Yu. Babaeva, et al., Congress Proceedings: “Traditional Medicine: Theoretical and Practical Aspects” [in Russian], Cheboksary (1966), p. 100.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medicinal Plants of the State Pharmacopeia [in Russian], I. A. Samylina and V. A. Severtsev (eds.) ANMI, Moscow (2003)., p. 468.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    TU 9373-142-04868244-2008, Fresh Echinacea purpurea Herb [in Russian], Moscow (2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    USSR State Pharmacopeia [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1987), XI edition, No. 1, pp. 196 – 296.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    USSR State Pharmacopeia [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1989), XI edition, No. 2, pp. 237 – 238.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. A. Dospekhov, Methods for Field Experiments [in Russian], Agropromizdat, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Yu. Babaeva, Rastit. Res., 38, No. 4, 29 – 36 (2002).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. B. Zagumennikov, E. Yu. Babaeva, E. V. Smirnova, et al., Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium “New and Non-Traditional Plans and the Potential for their Use [in Russian], Moscow Press (2009), 419 – 422.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. B. Zagumennikov
    • 1
  • E. Yu. Babaeva
    • 2
  • A. L. Petrova
    • 2
  • I. P. Malakhova
    • 3
  1. 1.All-Russian Science Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic PlantsRussian Academy of Agricultural SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Russian University of the Friendship of the PeoplesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.K. A. Timiryazev Moscow Agricultural AcademyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations