Undergraduate student engagement at a Chinese university: a case study



Student engagement in higher education has attracted worldwide attention in recent years because of its strong correlation with positive outcomes of student learning and also, increasingly, because of its influence on a consumer-oriented global education market. Such issues come into sharp focus in the case of China, currently the largest international market for higher education in Western Europe, Australia, and North America. As a growing number of Chinese universities become global players, they are competing with their Western European, Australian, and North American counterparts for a burgeoning home market of more discerning and cost conscious consumers. Nevertheless, limited attention has been paid by the higher education sector as to how student engagement is conceptualized by those consumers and what factors inform and influence their perceptions and choices. This case study of undergraduate student engagement at a Chinese university attempts to begin to answer these questions. It analyzed data collected through interviews and focus groups to investigate student and staff conceptualizations of student engagement and the factors that influenced it. The factors were categorized into external factors (contextual and institutional) and internal factors (personal). A sociocultural analysis identified three issues: transition, lack of studentstaff interaction, and shock students.


Chinese student engagement Higher education Transition Student–staff interaction Shock students Influencing factors 


  1. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297–308.Google Scholar
  2. Battiste, M. (2008). Research ethics for protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: institutional and researcher responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 497–509). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensimon, E. M. (2009). Foreword. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye, eds. Student engagement in higher education. New York and London: Routledge, pp. xxi–xxvi.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire: SRHE and Open University Press Imprint.Google Scholar
  5. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.Google Scholar
  7. Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, H., et al. (2008). “A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions”: learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cortazzi, M., Pilcher, N., & Jin, L. (2011). Language choices and “blind shadows”: investigating interviews with Chinese participants. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 505–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(2), 106–117.Google Scholar
  12. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfield, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature, 1991–2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762.Google Scholar
  14. Geyer, F. (2001). Sociology of alienation. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 388–392). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths, D. S., Winstanley, D., & Gabriel, Y. (2005). Learning shock: the trauma of return to formal learning. Management Learning, 36, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halai, N. (2007). Making use of bilingual interview data: some experiences from the field. The Qualitative Report, 12(3), 344–355.Google Scholar
  17. HEFCE (2008). Tender for a study into student engagement. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  18. HEFCE (2012). National Student Survey. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/lt/publicinfo/nationalstudentsurvey/ [Accessed July 21, 2012].
  19. Horwitz, E. K., et al. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: the influences of student and institutional characteristics. In American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  21. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: the influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Indiana University Centre for Postsecondary Research. (2002). From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Center for postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, C. (2003). Transitions into higher education: gendered implications for academic self-concept. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonasson, C. (2012). Teachers and students’ divergent perceptions of student engagement: recognition of school or workplace goals. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(5), 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education, (doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505), pp. 1–16. Available at: doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.
  26. Koljatic, M., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education. Higher Education, 42, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krause, K. (2005). Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied? Deconstructing the 21st century undergraduate student. In Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students Symposium. Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuh, G. D. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 277–304.Google Scholar
  30. Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123–155.Google Scholar
  31. Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuh, G. D. et al. (2005). Never let it rest: Lessons about student success from high-performing colleges and universities. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(4), 44–51.Google Scholar
  34. Kuh, G. D. et al., (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5).Google Scholar
  35. Lacey, C. (2012). The socialization of teachers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, J. G., & Yi, J. K. (1997). Asian international students’ adjustment: issues and program suggestions. College Student Journal, 31(4), 473–484.Google Scholar
  38. Little, B., et al. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. London: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information.Google Scholar
  39. Luo, X. Y., & Chen, J. Y. (2007). NSSE: a learning-focused higher education quality assessment. Comparative Education Review, 10, 50–54.Google Scholar
  40. Luo, Y., Ross, H., & Cen, Y. H. (2009a). Higher education measurement in the context of globalization—the development of NSSE-China: cultural adaptation, reliability and validity. Fudan Education Forum, 7(5), 12–18.Google Scholar
  41. Luo, Y., Shi, J. H., & Tu, D. B. (2009b). Annual report of Tsinghua College Education survey 2009: comparing with American top research universities. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 30(5), 1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McInnis, C. (2001). Signs of disengagement? The changing undergraduate experience in Australian universities: inaugural professorial lecture. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  44. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Revised and expanded from I case study research in education/I (Jossey Bass Education Series).Google Scholar
  45. Merwin, J. C. (1969). Historical view of changing concepts of evaluation. In R. L. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: new roles, new methods (68th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II) (pp. 6–25). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.Google Scholar
  47. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences: an account of the development and use of the college student experiences questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1), 16–22.Google Scholar
  51. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbery Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The relationship between institutional mission and students’involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 243–263.Google Scholar
  54. RAISE (2010). Homepage. Available at: http://raise-network.ning.com/ [Accessed July 21, 2012].
  55. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, H., Luo, Y., & Cen, Y. H. (2008). Assessing Tsinghua University and US universities on learning process indicators: an approach of higher education quality. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 29(2), 36–42.Google Scholar
  57. Ross, H., Cen, Y. H., & Zhou, Z. J. (2011). Assessing student engagement in China: responding to local and global discourse on raising educational quality. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 14(1), 24–37.Google Scholar
  58. Samuelowicz, K. (1987). Learning problems of overseas student. Higher Education Research and Development, 6(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shulman, L. S. (2002). Making differences: A table of learning. Change, 34(6), 35–44.Google Scholar
  60. Temple, B., & Yong, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tross, S. A. et al. (2000). Not just the usual cast of characteristics: Using personality to predict college performance and retention. Journal of College Student Development, 41(3), 325–336.Google Scholar
  65. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/studentengagement/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf [Accessed July 20, 2012].
  66. Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/studentengagement/StudentEngagementEvidenceSummary.pdf [Accessed July 20, 2012].
  67. Wang, S. (2011). The impact on student learning of student engagement in research universities—based on “NSSE-China” 2009 data analysis. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 32(4), 24–32.Google Scholar
  68. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wenger, E. (2011). Identification and learning in landscapes of practice. Available at: http://www.ternesrcseminars.net/EtienneWengerbio.htm [Accessed July 25, 2012].
  70. Zhu, H. (2010). The relationship between student engagement and college student achievement—the analysis of 2010 annual data set of Beijing college student survey. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 31(6), 35–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Institute of EducationThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.School of Foreign Languages and LiteratureShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.School of International EducationShandong University of Finance and EconomicsJinanChina

Personalised recommendations