Abstract
With the implementation of teacher performance pay in 2009 in China, teacher performance evaluation has become a heated topic. This research study follows up on two previous studies of teacher evaluation in China and continues the dialog by analyzing the latest trends in the context of teacher performance pay. There were two sources of information for this article: academic journal articles and teacher evaluation practices of two schools from Beijing. Seven themes were derived from a content analysis of the academic journal articles: (a) studies on teacher evaluation within the context of curriculum reform, (b) methods of teacher evaluation, (c) studies of miscellaneous responses, (d) studies on developmental teacher evaluation, (e) studies on teacher performance evaluation, (f) studies on teacher effectiveness, and (g) philosophical thoughts of teacher evaluation. The two cases of teacher evaluation practices revealed some changes since the implementation of teacher performance pay, such as a more comprehensive teacher evaluation system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A Banzhuren is a teacher who has class management responsibilities such as being responsible for the students’ studies, behaviors, and safety, as well as being responsible for contacting parents and coordinating with other teachers who teach the class. A Banzhuren also teaches as a regular teacher in addition to administration and counseling roles.
References
Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent.
Bian, J. (2007). Problems and solutions related to teacher evaluation in the context of new curriculum reform. Modern Educational Sciences, n3, 77–79. In Chinese.
Cai, M. (2008). An analysis of American performance-based teacher evaluation. Education in Science, 24, 91–96 (in Chinese).
Cai, Y., & Lin, C. (2006). Theory and practice on teacher performance evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(1), 29–39.
Chen, Q., & Liu, G. (2011). Review of teacher effectiveness research in western countries. Educational Research, 372, 90–95 (in Chinese).
Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3(1), 1–24.
Deng, Y. (2011). Study on teachers’ performance evaluation in the UK and the USA. The Modern Educational Journal, 179, 33–37 (in Chinese).
Dong, Y., & Ji, H. (2008). Research on the evaluation of teachers’ performance: based on the theoretical and practical study of teachers’ performance evaluation in China. Modern Education Journal, 145, 52–56 (in Chinese).
Dou, J. (2012). Promote the professional development of teachers’ performance evaluation study. Journal of Gansu Normal Colleges, 17, 137–139 (in Chinese).
Du, H. (2011). On ethical thoughts of peer evaluation. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, n10, 39–42. in Chinese.
Duan, J. (2011). Application of balanced score card used in teacher performance evaluation. Theory and Practice of Education, n9, 22–23. in Chinese.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
He, F. (2008). Teacher effectiveness of the Western countries in 20th century: reflection and inspirations. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences), 45, 99–104 (in Chinese).
Jiang, Y. (2009). The concept of teacher evaluation under new curriculum reform. Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education, 30, 125–128 (in Chinese).
Kobakhidze, M. N. (2010). Teacher incentives and the future of merit-based pay in Georgia. European Education, 42(3), 68–89.
Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 87–109.
Li, H., Yu, D., Li, G., & Yu, P. (2012). The problem of utilitarianism in the teacher evaluation system from the perspective of psychology. Theory and Practice of Education, 32, 48–51 (in Chinese).
Li, M., & Huang, L. (2010). Teachers evaluation system construction under new curriculum reform. Journal of Harbin University, 31, 120–123 (in Chinese).
Li, Y. (2010). Development of a teacher evaluation system in the context of the new curriculum reform. Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education, 29, 42–44 (in Chinese).
Liao, Y. (2010). On the methods of comparative educational research on the basis of empirical research and qualitative research. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education, 26, 102–104 (in Chinese).
Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2005). A follow-up study on teacher evaluation in China: historical analysis and latest trends. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 253–272.
Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The ongoing development of teacher evaluation and curriculum reform in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17, 243–261.
Liu, Y., & Sun, H. (2010). Comparative study on teaching efi cacy sense evaluation in China and USA. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 3, 188–192 (in Chinese).
Lu, X., & Han, L. (2006). Differential teacher effectiveness: structure, functions and limitations. Studies in Foreign Education, 189, 45–50. In Chinese.
Lu, X., Han, L., & Shen, J. (2010). Structure of teacher effectiveness and its relation to teacher personality traits. Educational Research and Experiment, n6, 70–74. in Chinese.
Luo, P., & Cui, Y. (2011). Construction of evaluation system for kinder garden teachers. Theory and Practice of Contemporary Education, 12, 15–18.
Lv, Y., & He, Z. (2011). Surveys of teacher performance evaluation in Shanxi Province. Education Exploration, 237, 73–74 (in Chinese).
Lv, Z., Ling, W., & Ma, C. (2009). Reform of teacher performance evaluation in the context of new curriculum. Modern Education Management, n9, 55–57. in Chinese.
Mi, J., & Dai, J. (2011). On the principles of implementing teacher performance evaluation in elementary and middle schools. Journal of Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, n5, 66–68. in Chinese.
Miao, X. (2011). An empirical study of research methodologies for doctoral dissertations on comparative education in mainland China. Journal of Graduate Education, 4, 86–90.
Ministry of Education (December 31, 2008). Guidelines to Teacher Performance Evaluation in Compulsory Schools. http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_670/201001/xxgk_81469.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2013. In Chinese
Murphy, K. J., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: an organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Park, A, & Hannum, E. (2001). Do teachers affect learning in developing countries? Evidence from matched student-teacher data from China. A working paper.
State Council (December 21, 2008). Guidelines to the Implementation of Performance Pay in Compulsory Schools. http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2008-12/21/content_1184109.htm. Accessed 22 January 2013. In Chinese
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3–4), 165–184.
Sun, H., Wang, T., & Lu, L. (2010). The inspirations of the teacher evaluation indicators in the United States to the construction of the teacher evaluation indicator system for Liaoning Province. Education in Science, 26, 74–79 (in Chinese).
Tan, J., & Zhang, L. (2010). On evaluation of compulsory teachers’ performance. Journal of Xuzhou Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), n1, 21–23. in Chinese.
Tang, S. (2010). The design and practice of developmental performance-based teacher evaluation model. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences Edition), 28, 145–148 (in Chinese).
Tian, L. (2012). Main experiences and insights of primary and secondary teacher performance evaluation in Missouri. Primary and Secondary Education in Foreign Countries, n11, 23–27. in Chinese.
Wang, C. (2012a). On reflection of teacher self-evaluation. Education Exploration, 247, 114–116 (in Chinese).
Wang, J. (2012b). Overview and comments on the study for the performance evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers of China. Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers’ College, 126, 40–42 (in Chinese).
Wang, L. (2010). Study of strategies for the evaluation of teachers in elementary and secondary school. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Elementary Education Edition), n5, 31–33. in Chinese.
Wang, Z. (2012c). Misunderstanding and countermeasures to the performance evaluation of primary and middle school teachers in China. Journal of Guizhou Normal College, 28, 51–53 (in Chinese).
Wang, Z., Wang, K., You, X., & Dang, H. (2010). Effects of teacher efficacy, work motivation, and mood on teaching innovation. Psychological Science, 33, 1254–1257 (in Chinese).
Wen, L. (2006). Thoughts on the teacher evaluation objectives in the document of the new curriculum reform. Modern Elementary and secondary Education, 145, 71–73 (in Chinese).
Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-country evidence on teacher performance pay. Economics of Education Review, 30, 404–418.
Wu, F. (2011). On British teachers education reform based on improvements of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Liuzhou Teachers College, 26, 121–124 (in Chinese).
Xin, H., Zhang, J., & Zhu, N. (2009). A comparative study of teacher performance pay between China and the USA. Educational Science Research, n6, 44–48. in Chinese.
Xu, J. (2007). Comparison on Sino-British teacher performance assessment in primary and secondary schools. Comparative Education Review, 206, 67–72 (in Chinese).
Yang, F., & Shao, C. (2010). On the teaching performance appraisal in China. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 12, 10–14 (in Chinese).
Yang, X., Zhao, X., & Jia, M. (2011). The essence of developing teacher evaluation system. Journal of Beijing City University, 105, 79–84 (in Chinese).
Zhang, F. (2010a). Construction of primary and secondary school physical education teacher evaluation system. Journal of Shandong Educational Institute, 139, 96–99.
Zhang, J. (2007). An objective view on teacher performance assessment and teacher professional development assessment. Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 47–52 (in Chinese).
Zhang, J. (2010b). On the unity of teacher performance evaluation and developmental evaluation. Continuing Education Research, n1, 117–119. in Chinese.
Zhao, D. (2010a). Appraisal of teachers: surpassing of modernity in post-modernism. Journal of Xian Eurasia University, 8, 54–56 (in Chinese).
Zhao, D. (2010b). The performance assessment scheme for California teachers in America and its inspiration. Studies in Foreign Education, 239, 58–62 (in Chinese).
Zhao, D., & Xia, J. (2008). The application of performance assessment for teacher qualification certificating in America and its inspiration. Studies in Foreign Education, 212, 11–16 (in Chinese).
Zhao, M., & Liu, S. (2011). The realistic representations and transcendence of traditional culture in teacher evaluation. Teacher Education Research, 23, 49–54 (in Chinese).
Zheng, Z., & Zhao, F. (2006). A strategic study of the developmental teacher evaluation. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 8, 94–97 (in Chinese).
Zhou, Y., & Bian, Y. (2011). Value-added assessment of teacher effectiveness in American: development in research and practice. Global Education, 291, 72–77 (in Chinese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Zhao, D. Teacher evaluation in China: latest trends and future directions. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 231–250 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9168-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9168-8