Teacher evaluation in China: latest trends and future directions



With the implementation of teacher performance pay in 2009 in China, teacher performance evaluation has become a heated topic. This research study follows up on two previous studies of teacher evaluation in China and continues the dialog by analyzing the latest trends in the context of teacher performance pay. There were two sources of information for this article: academic journal articles and teacher evaluation practices of two schools from Beijing. Seven themes were derived from a content analysis of the academic journal articles: (a) studies on teacher evaluation within the context of curriculum reform, (b) methods of teacher evaluation, (c) studies of miscellaneous responses, (d) studies on developmental teacher evaluation, (e) studies on teacher performance evaluation, (f) studies on teacher effectiveness, and (g) philosophical thoughts of teacher evaluation. The two cases of teacher evaluation practices revealed some changes since the implementation of teacher performance pay, such as a more comprehensive teacher evaluation system.


Teacher evaluation Teacher performance pay Chinese teachers Teacher effectiveness 


  1. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent.Google Scholar
  2. Bian, J. (2007). Problems and solutions related to teacher evaluation in the context of new curriculum reform. Modern Educational Sciences, n3, 77–79. In Chinese.Google Scholar
  3. Cai, M. (2008). An analysis of American performance-based teacher evaluation. Education in Science, 24, 91–96 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Cai, Y., & Lin, C. (2006). Theory and practice on teacher performance evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Q., & Liu, G. (2011). Review of teacher effectiveness research in western countries. Educational Research, 372, 90–95 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  7. Deng, Y. (2011). Study on teachers’ performance evaluation in the UK and the USA. The Modern Educational Journal, 179, 33–37 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Dong, Y., & Ji, H. (2008). Research on the evaluation of teachers’ performance: based on the theoretical and practical study of teachers’ performance evaluation in China. Modern Education Journal, 145, 52–56 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Dou, J. (2012). Promote the professional development of teachers’ performance evaluation study. Journal of Gansu Normal Colleges, 17, 137–139 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  10. Du, H. (2011). On ethical thoughts of peer evaluation. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, n10, 39–42. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  11. Duan, J. (2011). Application of balanced score card used in teacher performance evaluation. Theory and Practice of Education, n9, 22–23. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. He, F. (2008). Teacher effectiveness of the Western countries in 20th century: reflection and inspirations. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences), 45, 99–104 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Jiang, Y. (2009). The concept of teacher evaluation under new curriculum reform. Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education, 30, 125–128 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Kobakhidze, M. N. (2010). Teacher incentives and the future of merit-based pay in Georgia. European Education, 42(3), 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, H., Yu, D., Li, G., & Yu, P. (2012). The problem of utilitarianism in the teacher evaluation system from the perspective of psychology. Theory and Practice of Education, 32, 48–51 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Li, M., & Huang, L. (2010). Teachers evaluation system construction under new curriculum reform. Journal of Harbin University, 31, 120–123 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Li, Y. (2010). Development of a teacher evaluation system in the context of the new curriculum reform. Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education, 29, 42–44 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Liao, Y. (2010). On the methods of comparative educational research on the basis of empirical research and qualitative research. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education, 26, 102–104 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  21. Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2005). A follow-up study on teacher evaluation in China: historical analysis and latest trends. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The ongoing development of teacher evaluation and curriculum reform in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, Y., & Sun, H. (2010). Comparative study on teaching efi cacy sense evaluation in China and USA. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 3, 188–192 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Lu, X., & Han, L. (2006). Differential teacher effectiveness: structure, functions and limitations. Studies in Foreign Education, 189, 45–50. In Chinese.Google Scholar
  25. Lu, X., Han, L., & Shen, J. (2010). Structure of teacher effectiveness and its relation to teacher personality traits. Educational Research and Experiment, n6, 70–74. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  26. Luo, P., & Cui, Y. (2011). Construction of evaluation system for kinder garden teachers. Theory and Practice of Contemporary Education, 12, 15–18.Google Scholar
  27. Lv, Y., & He, Z. (2011). Surveys of teacher performance evaluation in Shanxi Province. Education Exploration, 237, 73–74 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  28. Lv, Z., Ling, W., & Ma, C. (2009). Reform of teacher performance evaluation in the context of new curriculum. Modern Education Management, n9, 55–57. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  29. Mi, J., & Dai, J. (2011). On the principles of implementing teacher performance evaluation in elementary and middle schools. Journal of Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, n5, 66–68. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  30. Miao, X. (2011). An empirical study of research methodologies for doctoral dissertations on comparative education in mainland China. Journal of Graduate Education, 4, 86–90.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education (December 31, 2008). Guidelines to Teacher Performance Evaluation in Compulsory Schools. http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_670/201001/xxgk_81469.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2013. In Chinese
  32. Murphy, K. J., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: an organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  33. Park, A, & Hannum, E. (2001). Do teachers affect learning in developing countries? Evidence from matched student-teacher data from China. A working paper.Google Scholar
  34. State Council (December 21, 2008). Guidelines to the Implementation of Performance Pay in Compulsory Schools. http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2008-12/21/content_1184109.htm. Accessed 22 January 2013. In Chinese
  35. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3–4), 165–184.Google Scholar
  36. Sun, H., Wang, T., & Lu, L. (2010). The inspirations of the teacher evaluation indicators in the United States to the construction of the teacher evaluation indicator system for Liaoning Province. Education in Science, 26, 74–79 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  37. Tan, J., & Zhang, L. (2010). On evaluation of compulsory teachers’ performance. Journal of Xuzhou Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), n1, 21–23. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  38. Tang, S. (2010). The design and practice of developmental performance-based teacher evaluation model. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences Edition), 28, 145–148 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Tian, L. (2012). Main experiences and insights of primary and secondary teacher performance evaluation in Missouri. Primary and Secondary Education in Foreign Countries, n11, 23–27. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, C. (2012a). On reflection of teacher self-evaluation. Education Exploration, 247, 114–116 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  41. Wang, J. (2012b). Overview and comments on the study for the performance evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers of China. Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers’ College, 126, 40–42 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  42. Wang, L. (2010). Study of strategies for the evaluation of teachers in elementary and secondary school. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Elementary Education Edition), n5, 31–33. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  43. Wang, Z. (2012c). Misunderstanding and countermeasures to the performance evaluation of primary and middle school teachers in China. Journal of Guizhou Normal College, 28, 51–53 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  44. Wang, Z., Wang, K., You, X., & Dang, H. (2010). Effects of teacher efficacy, work motivation, and mood on teaching innovation. Psychological Science, 33, 1254–1257 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  45. Wen, L. (2006). Thoughts on the teacher evaluation objectives in the document of the new curriculum reform. Modern Elementary and secondary Education, 145, 71–73 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  46. Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-country evidence on teacher performance pay. Economics of Education Review, 30, 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu, F. (2011). On British teachers education reform based on improvements of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Liuzhou Teachers College, 26, 121–124 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  48. Xin, H., Zhang, J., & Zhu, N. (2009). A comparative study of teacher performance pay between China and the USA. Educational Science Research, n6, 44–48. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  49. Xu, J. (2007). Comparison on Sino-British teacher performance assessment in primary and secondary schools. Comparative Education Review, 206, 67–72 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  50. Yang, F., & Shao, C. (2010). On the teaching performance appraisal in China. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 12, 10–14 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  51. Yang, X., Zhao, X., & Jia, M. (2011). The essence of developing teacher evaluation system. Journal of Beijing City University, 105, 79–84 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, F. (2010a). Construction of primary and secondary school physical education teacher evaluation system. Journal of Shandong Educational Institute, 139, 96–99.Google Scholar
  53. Zhang, J. (2007). An objective view on teacher performance assessment and teacher professional development assessment. Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 47–52 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  54. Zhang, J. (2010b). On the unity of teacher performance evaluation and developmental evaluation. Continuing Education Research, n1, 117–119. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  55. Zhao, D. (2010a). Appraisal of teachers: surpassing of modernity in post-modernism. Journal of Xian Eurasia University, 8, 54–56 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  56. Zhao, D. (2010b). The performance assessment scheme for California teachers in America and its inspiration. Studies in Foreign Education, 239, 58–62 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  57. Zhao, D., & Xia, J. (2008). The application of performance assessment for teacher qualification certificating in America and its inspiration. Studies in Foreign Education, 212, 11–16 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  58. Zhao, M., & Liu, S. (2011). The realistic representations and transcendence of traditional culture in teacher evaluation. Teacher Education Research, 23, 49–54 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  59. Zheng, Z., & Zhao, F. (2006). A strategic study of the developmental teacher evaluation. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 8, 94–97 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  60. Zhou, Y., & Bian, Y. (2011). Value-added assessment of teacher effectiveness in American: development in research and practice. Global Education, 291, 72–77 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationQufu Normal UniversityQufuChina
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationBeijing Normal UniversityHaidianChina

Personalised recommendations