Tomorrow’s teachers—selecting the best: An exploration of the quality rationale behind academic and experiential selection criteria for initial teacher education programmes

  • Manuela Heinz


Using Ireland as an example, this paper explores the rationale behind various selection criteria currently used to select suitable candidates for initial teacher education courses. It investigates and discusses patterns of association between second-level student teachers’ background characteristics on entry to their teacher education programme Professional Diploma in Education (PDE) and their achievement in terms of their final academic and teaching practice grades. It draws on a longitudinal analysis of application and examination data collected from eight student teacher cohorts (2000–2007, N = 1,023) who completed their second-level initial teacher education at one Irish university. Special attention will be paid to the predictive value of entrants’ prior academic performance and teaching experience for their success in the academic as well as practical components of their teacher education course. The quality rationale behind academic selection criteria is contested on the basis of findings from this study. The positive impact of prior teaching experience on teaching practice performance and the differences in achievement observed between students from different academic fields are discussed.


Initial teacher education Selection criteria Academic performance Teaching experience Student teacher backgrounds Performance 


  1. Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. (McKinsey Report) [Online] Available at: Accessed 04 Jan 2011.
  2. Bloxham, S. (2008). Assessment in teacher education: stakeholder conflict and its resolution. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 2(1), 13–21.Google Scholar
  3. Breen, R. (1986). Subject availability and student performance in the senior cycle of Irish post-primary schools. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Callaghan, P. (2009). Grade inflation in Irish Universities? Report for the University Council, Trinity College Dublin. Available at: Accessed on 18 Mar 2013.
  5. Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Mok, M. M. C. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caskey, M. M., Peterson, K. D., & Temple, J. B. (2001). Complex admission selection procedures for a graduate preservice teacher education program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 7–21.Google Scholar
  7. Childs, R. A., Broad, K., Gallagher-Mackay, K., Sher, Y., Escayg, K.-A., & McGrath, C. (2011). Pursuing equity in and through teacher education program admissions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(24), 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Clancy, P. (1995). Access to college: patterns of continuity and change. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, M., Lodge, A., & Shevlin, M. (2012). Evaluating initial teacher education programmes: perspectives from the Republic of Ireland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Conway, P. F., Murphy, R., Rath, A. & Hall, K. (2009). Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: a nine-country cross national study. Report commissioned by the Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  12. Coolahan, J. (2003). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: country background report for Ireland. Dublin: DES, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Archives Analysis, 8. Available at: Accessed 10 Feb 2007.
  14. Denner, P. R., Salzman, S. A., & Newsome, J. D. (2001). Selecting the qualified: a standards-based teacher education admission process. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1902). The educational situation: as concerns the elementary school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 387–403.Google Scholar
  16. Drudy, S. (2004). Second-level teacher education in the Republic of Ireland: Consecutive Programmes. In: A. Burje (Ed.) Teacher education in the Republic of Ireland: retrospect and prospect. Standing Conference on Teacher Education North and South (SCoTENS).Google Scholar
  17. Drudy, S. (2006). Gender differences in entrance patterns and awards in initial teacher education. Irish Educational Studies, 25, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drudy, S., Martin, M., Woods, M., & O’Flynn, J. (2005). Men and the classroom: gender imbalances in teaching. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eurydice. (2002). The teaching profession in Europe: profile, trends, concerns. Report I: initial training and transition to working life. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Gilomer, D. H., Latham, A. S., & Ziomek, R. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: the impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  21. Gleeson, J. (2004). Concurrent teacher education (post-primary) in the Republic of Ireland: some issues and trends. In: A. Burke (Ed.) Teacher education in the Republic of Ireland: retrospect and prospect. Standing Conference on Teacher Education North and South (SCoTENS).Google Scholar
  22. Gopinathan, S., & Ho, W. K. (2000). Singapore. In P. Morris & J. Williamson (Eds.), Teacher education in Asia-Pacific region. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Graduate Teacher Training Registry (2010). Interviews [Online]. Available at: Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
  24. Haberman, M. (1988). Proposals for recruiting minority teachers: promising practices and attractive detours. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 38–44Google Scholar
  25. Hannan, D., Smyth, E., McCullagh, J., O’Leary, R., & McMahon, D. (1996). Coeducation and gender equality: exam performance, stress and personal development. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heinz, M. (2013). The next generation of teachers: an investigation of second-level student teachers’ backgrounds in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Educational Studies. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2012.747737.
  27. Heinz, M. (2011). The next generation of teachers: selection, backgrounds and motivations of second-level student teachers in the Republic of Ireland. PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway.Google Scholar
  28. Heinz, M. (2008). The composition of applicants and entrants to teacher education programmes in Ireland: trends and patterns. Irish Educational Studies, 27, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heinz, M. (2007). What makes a good second-level teacher? student teachers’ narrative accounts about quality learning and teaching. Educational Studies Association of Ireland (ESAI) 32nd Annual Conference, Cavan, March.Google Scholar
  30. Higher Diploma in Education (NUI) Application Centre (HDEAC). (2005). Higher Diploma in Education (NUI) Application Centre Handbook for 2006 Entry. Ireland, GalwayGoogle Scholar
  31. Hillard, A. G. (1986). From hurdles to standards of quality in teacher testing. The Journal of Negro Education, 55, 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ireland. Department of Education and Skills (DES) (2012) Report of the International Review Panel on the Structure of Initial Teacher Education Provision in Ireland: Review conducted on behalf of the Department of Education and Skills. Available at: Accessed on 18 Mar 2013.
  33. Ireland. The Teaching Council. (2008). Strategic Plan 2008–2011. Available at: Accessed 22 Dec 2010.
  34. Ireland. The Teaching Council. (2007). Codes of Professional Conduct for teacher. Available at: Accessed 22 Oct 2010.
  35. Ireland. The Teaching Council. (2011). Policy on the Continuum of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobowitz, T. (1994). Admission to teacher education programs: Goodlad’s sixth postulate. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonsson, A., Mattheos, N., Svingby, G., & Attstrom, R. (2007). Dynamic assessment and the “interactive examination”. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 17–27.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, S. M., & Kardos, S. M. (2008). The next generation of teachers: who enters, who stays, and why. In M. Cochran-Smith, M. S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Killeavy, M. (1998). The professional development of primary teachers. PhD, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
  40. Laman, A. E., & Reeves, D. E. (1983). Admission to teacher education programs: the status and trends. Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malvern, D. D. (1991). Assessing the personal qualities of applicants to teacher training. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menter, I., Hulme, M., Elliot, D. & Levin, J. (2010). Literature Review on teacher education in the 21st century. Edinburgh: Education Analytical Services, Schools Research, Scottish Government. Available at: Accessed 06 Jan 2011.
  43. Moran, A. (2008). Challenges surrounding widening participation and fair access to initial teacher education: can it be achieved? Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 34, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. OECD (2005). Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  45. OECD (2009). Education at a Glance 2009: OECD Indicators. [Online] Available at:,3343,en_2649_39263238_43586328_1_1_1_37455,00.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2010.
  46. Postgraduate Diploma in Education (NUI) Application Centre (PDEAC) Assessment Committee. (2010). Proposed change in formula. Written communication to the PDEAC board, 29 April 2010.Google Scholar
  47. Shechtman, Z. (1988). Selecting candidates for teachers’ training college: a group assessment procedure as an alternative to individual interviews. European Journal of Teacher Education, 11, 185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shechtman, Z. (1992). A group assessment procedure as a predictor of on-the-job performance of teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, H. A., & Pratt, D. (1996). The use of biodata in admissions to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smyth, E. (1999). Do schools differ? Academic and personal development among pupils in second-level sector. Dublin: ESRI.Google Scholar
  51. Vegas, E., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2001). From high school to teaching: many steps, who makes it? Teachers College Record, 103, 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, H.-H., & Fwu, B.-J. (2007). In pursuit of teacher quality in diversity: a study of the selection mechanisms of new secondary teacher education programmes in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: research on the demographic profile. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2008). Who is teaching? Does it matter? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of Ireland GalwayGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations