Using data to support educational improvement
Data on student achievement are increasingly being used to support effective policy and practice, and to move education systems towards more evidence-informed approaches to large-scale improvement. In this paper, we outline strategies used in Ontario, Canada to create, enhance and apply a range of data to support educational improvement. These strategies were intended to integrate the collection of data and its use at the three levels of school, district, and province. The strategy also included improving educator capacity to use data and the development of better analytic tools to understand data in context.
KeywordsAssessment School improvement Data use planning Ontario Literacy
- Assessment Reform Group U.K. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, U.K: University of Cambridge School of Education. Retrieved November 20, 2007 from http://www.aaic.org.uk.
- Barber, M., & Fullan, M. (2005). Tri level development: It’s the system. Retrieved November 20, 2007 from http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_05/TriLevel%20Dev%27t.pdf.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.Google Scholar
- Campbell, C., & Fullan, M. (2006) ‘Unlocking the Potential for District Wide Reform’. Unpublished report. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Education. Available at: http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_06/Articles_06a.htm.
- Datnow, A., Parker, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performance school systems use data to improve instructions for elementary students. Center on Educational Governance, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California Commissioned by Newschool Venture Fund.Google Scholar
- Doyle, D. (2003). Data-Driven Decision-Making. T.H.E Journal Online. Retrieved November 23, 2007 from www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/articleprintversion.cfm?aid=4419.
- Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading in a Data Rich World: Harnessing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Edmonds, R. R. & Frederiksen, J. R. (1979). Search for Effective Schools: The Identification and Analysis of City Schools that are Instructionally Effective for Poor Children (ED 170 396).Google Scholar
- Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Firestone, W., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95–113.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Gillborn, D. & Gipps, C. (1996). Recent research on the achievements of ethnic pupils minority. Report for the Office for standards in Education of London HMSO.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, L. S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 647–673.Google Scholar
- Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving Schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. (2005) Signposts of Success: Interpreting Ontario’s Elementary Secondary school Test Scores. C.D. Howe Institute Policy 40.Google Scholar
- Kerr, K., Marsh, J., Schuyler Ikemoto, G., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). “Strategies to Promote Data Use for Instructional Improvement: Actions, Outcomes, and Lessons from Three Urban Districts”.Google Scholar
- Lachat, M., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices That Support Data Use in Urban High Schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR).Google Scholar
- Lafee, S. (2002). Data-Driven Districts [Electronic Version]. School Administrator, 59(11), 6–79–10, 12, 14–15.Google Scholar
- Levin, B. (2006). How can research in education contribute to policy? Review of Australian Research in Education, 6, 147–157.Google Scholar
- MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves. London, U. K.: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mason, S. A. (2001). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Using data for educational decision making. Newsletter of the Comprehensive Center-Region VI, 6, 3–6, spring.Google Scholar
- McIntire, T. (2002). The administrator’s guide to data-driven decision making. Technology & Learning, 22(11), 18–28, 32–33.Google Scholar
- Mortimore, P., & Whitty, G. (1997). Can school improvement overcome the effects of disadvantage? Institute of Education Occasional Paper. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Nutely, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
- OECD (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Ontario Ministry of Education (2006a). Target Setting and Improvement Planning. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontariox.Google Scholar
- Ontario Ministry of Education (2006b). Differentiating Instruction: Continuing the Conversation. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
- Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. A. (2001). Student Self-Evaluation: What the research says and what practice shows. Centre for Development and Learning. www.cdl.org.
- Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995a). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: A review of school effectiveness research. A report by the Institute of Education for the Office for Standards in Education. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Sebba, J. (2004). Developing an Evidence-based Approach to Policy and Practice in Education. In G. Thomas, & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence based Practice in Education. Maidenhead: OUP/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Slee, R., & Weiner, G.with Tomlinson, S. (Eds.). (1998). School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and the school improvement movements. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
- Stiggins, R. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. New York: Merrill.Google Scholar
- Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie and D. Reynolds (Eds.), International handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–185). Falmer, London.Google Scholar
- Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
- Tremblay, R. E., & Lemarguand, D. (2001) Individual risk and protective factors, child delinquents: Development, Interventions and Service Needs, 137–164.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria. VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson, C. A., & Eidson, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in Practice (Grades 5–9). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design p. 200. Alexandria, VA: ASCD (ISBN: 13-978-1-4166-0284-2).Google Scholar