Measurement of Anode Arc Attachment Movement in DC Arc Plasma Torch at Atmospheric Pressure
- 219 Downloads
Direct current (DC) arc plasma torches are widely used in various industrial applications. Studying processes in their anode area helps to extend their lifetime, and stabilize the plasma flow for plasma applications. This paper reports detailed observations of the fast movement (above 100 m/s) of the anode arc attachment in a hybrid water-argon DC arc plasma torch with an external anode. We measured a mean electrical conductivity of a plasma volume above the anode and found a relation between the attachment movement and the anode erosion. Further, we measured average attachment speed, the average period of the restrike process and the average distances travelled by the attachment under different experimental conditions such as different values of the arc electric current, argon flow rate and different anode configurations. For our measurements, we used a high-speed camera and a high-voltage probe. Our results are in agreement with a model of plasma generated by a hybrid plasma torch and with spectroscopy measurements. The results describe the movement of the anode arc attachment in detail and provide experimental data on average plasma electrical conductivity in hot anode areas. Both the measurements of the mean electrical conductivity and the procedure for quantitative comparisons of anode erosion can be used also in water plasma torches and theoretically also in gas plasma torches.
KeywordsDC arc plasma torch Arc attachment movement Anode area Anode erosion High-speed camera
The present work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic under projects GA15-19444S and GC17-10246J. Access to the computing and storage facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum provided under the program “Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures” (CESNET LM2015042), is greatly appreciated.
- 3.Hrabovsky M (2011) In: Shaukat SS (ed) Progress in biomass and bioenergy production. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kulacki Francis A (2017) Handbook of thermal science and engineering. Springer, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wutzke SA (1967) Conditions governing the symptomatic behavior of an electric arc in superimposed flow field. Ph.D. thesis, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
- 14.Russ S, Pfender E, Heberlein J (1993) Anode arc attachment control using boundary layer bleed holes. In: Proceedings of the 1993 NTSC, Anaheim, CA, pp 7–11Google Scholar
- 15.Ondac P, Maslani A, Hrabovsky M (2016) Investigation of the arc-anode attachment area by utilizing a high-speed camera. Plasma Phys Technol 3:1–4Google Scholar
- 19.Brezina V, Hrabovsky M, Konrad M, Kopecky V, Sember V (2001) New plasma spraying torch with combined gas-liquid stabilization of arc. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on plasma chem, Orléans, France, vol 3, pp 1021–1026Google Scholar
- 29.Kavka T, Maslani A, Kopecky V, Sember V, Chumak O, Hrabovsky M (2008) Influence of plasma generation conditions in gas-water torch on spraying process. Thermal spray crossing borders: ITSC 2008. In: Proceedings of the international thermal spray conference and exposition. DVS Verlag, Duseldorf, pp 1457–1461Google Scholar
- 30.Kavka T, Maslani A, Chumak O, Hrabovsky M (2008): Character of plasma flow at the exit of DC arc gas-water torch. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on flow dynamics. Institute of Fluid Science Tohoku University, Sendai, pp 11–12Google Scholar
- 31.Jenista J, Kopecky V, Hrabovsky M (1999) Effect of vortex motion of stabilizing liquid wall on properties of arc in water plasma torch. In: Fauchais P et al (eds) Heat and mass transfer under plasma conditions—Annal of the New York Academy of Sciences vol 891, pp 64–71Google Scholar