Non-linear Compensated Dwell Time for Efficient Fused Silica Surface Figuring Using Inductively Coupled Plasma
- 90 Downloads
Atmospheric plasma etching has been increasingly applied in the fabrication of optical elements for high efficiency and near-zero damage to optical surfaces. However, the non-linearity of material removal rate is inevitable because of the thermal effect of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching for fused silica. To apply ICP to figure fused silica surface, the time-varying non-linearity between material removal rate and dwell time is analyzed. An experimental model of removal function is established considering the time-varying non-linearity. According to this model, an algorithm based on nested pulsed iterative method is proposed for calculating and compensating this time-varying non-linearity by varying the dwell time. Simulation results show that this algorithm can calculate and adjust the dwell time accurately and remove surface errors with rapid convergence. Surface figuring experiments were set up on the fused silica planar work-pieces with a size of 100 mm (width) × 100 mm (length) × 10 mm (thickness). With the compensated dwell time, the surface error converges rapidly from 4.556 λ PV (peak-to-valley) to 0.839 λ PV within 13.2 min in one iterative figuring. The power spectral density analysis indicates that the spatial frequency errors between 0.01 and 0.04 mm−1 are smoothed efficiently, and the spatial frequency errors between 0.04 and 0.972 mm−1 are also corrected. Experimental results demonstrate that the ICP surface figuring can achieve high convergence for surface error reduction using the compensated dwell time. Therefore, the ICP surface figuring can greatly improve surface quality and machining efficiency for fused silica optical elements.
KeywordsInductively coupled plasma Fused silica Material removal rate Time-varying non-linearity Surface figuring
This research work was supported by the project “Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET) (No. 130165)”.
- 1.Li N, Wang B, Jin H (2014) Harbin Inst Technol 21(5):124–128Google Scholar
- 2.Wang Z, Wu Y, Dai Y (2007) Aviat Precis Manuf Technol 43(5):1–5Google Scholar
- 3.Nie X, Li S, Dai Y, Song C (2013) Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 8786(22):11306–11312Google Scholar
- 5.Wang Y, Hang L, Hu M (2008) Surf Technol 37(1):51–53Google Scholar
- 9.Eichentopf I-M, Böhm G, Meister J, Arnold T (2010) Plasma Process Polym 6(S10):S204–S208Google Scholar
- 13.Fanara C, Shore P, Nicholls J-R, Lyford N, Sommer P, Fiske P (2006) SPIE Astron Telesc Instrum Int Soc Opt Photonics 10:933–939Google Scholar
- 15.Zhang J, Wang B, Dong S (2008) Int J Precis Eng Manuf 9(2):39–43Google Scholar
- 17.Shi B, Dai Y, Xie X, Li S, Zhou L (2016) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 36(3):1–10Google Scholar
- 20.Castelli M, Jourdain R, Morantz P, Shore P (2012) Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 8450:34Google Scholar
- 24.Arnold T, Böhm G, Paetzelt H (2016) Nonconventional ultra-precision manufacturing of ULE mirror surfaces using atmospheric reactive plasma jets. In: SPIE astronomical telescopes and instrumentation, p 99123NGoogle Scholar