Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 249–258 | Cite as

Moisture Removal from Natural Jute Fibre by Plasma Drying Process

  • M. M. Morshed
  • M. M. Alam
  • S. M. Daniels
Original Paper


Low temperature plasma process is an effective alternative method compared to the conventional vacuum drying method for removing moisture. Plasma drying removes the moisture from fibres faster and to a lower level than conventional methods. It also improves the surface properties of the fibres. The jute fibre was treated with inert gas argon plasma without damaging the fibre. The OES was used to monitor the moisture desorbed from the fibre during processing. The XRD results revealed a change in the macromolecular structure as well as the crystallinity of the treated fibre. The FTIR and TGA provided the evidence of moisture removal from the fibres. It was found that the plasma treated fibres contain less than 1.8% (wt.) moisture which is a promising result when compared with conventional drying processes.The average tensile strength of the plasma treated fibres increased by 12.5% compared with those treated with the conventional vacuum dry process.


Natural jute fibre Moisture Argon plasma Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) 



The author would like to thanks Mr Mir Mohammad Faruk and Mr Mohiuddin Patoary who have supplied the environment friendly natural fibre from Bangladesh. The author also would like to thank the NCPST for use of their facilities for plasma treatment and characterization.


  1. 1.
    Hua ZQ, Sitaru R, Denes F (1997) Plasma Polym 2(3):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oraji R (2008) The effect of plasma treatment on flax fibres, [M Eng Thesis]. Department of Agriculture and Bioresource Engity University of Saskatchewan, SaskatoonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Misra S, Mohanty A (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellmann C, Caspari A, Albrecht V et al (2005) Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 267:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santulli C, Caruso AP (2009) J Malays Polym 4:19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bavan DS, Kumar GCM (2010) J Reinforc Plast Compos 29(24):3600ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cullity BD, Stock SR (2001) Elements of X-ray diffraction, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morshed MM, Alam MM, Daniels SM (2010) Plasma Sci Technol 12:325ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roy G, Saha SC (2011) Ind J Fibr Textl Res 36:178Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosomi K, Kikawa T, Goto S, Yamada H, Katsuyama T, Arakawa Y (2006) J Vac Sci Technol B24:1226Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiong Q, Nikiforov AY, Lu XP, Leys C (2010) J Phys D Appl Phys 43:415201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Socrates G (2001) Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies, 3rd edn. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarani A, Nikiforov AY, Leys C (2010) Phys Plasm 17:063504ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spinace MAS, Labert CS, Frmoselli KKG, De Paoli Macro A (2009) Carbohydr Polym 77:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ray D, Sarkar BK, Basak RK, Rana AK (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 85:2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic Engineering, National Centre for Plasma Science and TechnologyDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.Nanomaterials Processing Laboratory, School of Electronic EngineeringDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations