Advertisement

Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 67, Issue 6, pp 673–688 | Cite as

An Eriksonian Psycho-Social Response to Confucius on the Development of Virtue in Boys and Men

  • Hyon-Uk ShinEmail author
Article
  • 187 Downloads

Abstract

As the exemplar of how men should live, for over six hundred years Confucius has contributed greatly to the formation of the mindset and identity of Korean males. His life and teachings that emphasize the values of benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, and sincerity have long been regarded as the quintessential frame of reference for males in Korea to emulate. Yet at the same time, some of the legacies of Confucius connote oppression because of their overemphasis on the enhancement of human cognition and will to the neglect of the robustness and usefulness of emotion. It is quite probable that the oppressive mechanism inherent in Confucian teachings on human development—i.e., the rigid and regulatory characteristic that overemphasizes or obsesses about rites, rules, decency, and norms—comes to a large extent from Confucius’s own relational and emotional vulnerability toward his parents. This paper suggests that Erik Erikson’s view on the psychosocial dimension of human development can usefully complement what Confucius did not pay much attention to in his lifelong efforts to cultivate human virtue. Indeed, Erikson shows that the robustness of emotion precedes the enrichment of cognition as well as the reinforcement of will and that it is nurtured by one’s caring and constructive relationships with significant others. In this regard, the caregiver’s role is to help males in Korea reconcile with their genuine selves in which cognition and will are in harmony with emotion.

Keywords

Life cycle Confucius Erik Erikson Virtue Lost object 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Reggie Abraham, Ruben Arjona, Robert Dykstra, Danjuma Gibson, Jaco Hamman, Jay-Paul Hinds, Jason Hays, Ryan LaMothe, Hyon-Uk Shin, Jason Whitehead, Myounghun Yun, and Phil Zylla for their feedback on this paper, which was originally presented in Philadelphia, PA, at a pastoral theology conference at the Presbyterian Historical Society.

References

  1. Bao, P. S. (2013). Confucius biography. Beijing: China Youth Press.Google Scholar
  2. Capps, D. (1987). Deadly sins and saving virtues. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  3. Capps, D. (1995). The child’s song: The religious abuse of children. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  4. Capps, D. (1997). Men, religion, and melancholia: James, Otto, Jung, and Erikson. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Capps, D. (2002). Life cycle theory and pastoral care. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  6. Confucius. (2014). The analects. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Erikson, E. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Erikson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. (1985). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, E. (1994). Insight and responsibility. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1914). Some reflections on schoolboy psychology. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13). London, England: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1924). The economic problem in masochism. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19). London, England: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kohut, H. (1995). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. Madison: International University Press.Google Scholar
  14. McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sima, Q. (1993). Records of the grand historian: Han dynasty I & II. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2013). Confucius. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/#ConLif. Accessed 23 Mar 2013.
  17. Tillich, P. (2005). The new being. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York: Karnac.Google Scholar
  19. Zhu, X., & Hsiao, H. (2016). Lesser learning. Seoul: Hongik Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seoul Women’s UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations