Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 471–488 | Cite as

Political Dimensions of Pastoral Care in Community Disaster Responses



All caregiving takes place in multiple political contexts and assumes or actually furthers various political agendas, whether acknowledged or not. When strategically incorporated into pastoral and spiritual care, politically responsive actions may enhance the practice of care. When disaster strikes a community, ritual engagement of the larger public context provides a significant opportunity for pastoral caregivers to function as public pastoral theologians and to influence the corporate response to communal challenges. In these circumstances of community vulnerability, pastoral caregivers and communities of faith are positioned to provide spiritual care that combines solace and safety for the victims with guidance and shaping influence on the ritual practices and rhetorical interpretations called upon to assist the community to endure, respond, and heal. This article examines some central political aspects of the pastoral caregiver’s repertoire that might further a stricken community’s ritual and rhetorical resources necessary to sustain life, share loss, reclaim goodness, and rebuild for a strong future. Drawing upon a view of lamentation as a tri-partite process of sharing anguish, interrogating causes, and reinvesting in hope, I suggest how the spiritual and pastoral caregiver may collaboratively participate in a “disaster-response matrix” that organizes corporate responses to catastrophic disaster. This article pays particular attention to macro-, meso-, and micro-level political negotiations necessary to ensure respect for diversity and shared responsibility in creating rituals, memorials, and public narratives at the onset of disaster and in its aftermath over the generations. Illustrations from the experience of religious caregivers at Columbine, Hurricane Katrina, 9/11, Aurora, Newtown, and Boston are presented to guide pastoral engagement of civil society in disruptive times.


Disaster Political Lamentation Memorial Disaster-response matrix 


  1. Ashby, H. U., Jr. (2000). Pastoral theology as public theology: Participating in the healing of damaged and damaging cultures and institutions. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 10, 18–27.Google Scholar
  2. Billman, K. D., & Migliore, D. L. (1999). Rachel’s cry: Prayer of lament and rebirth of hope. Cleveland: United Church Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dionne, E. J. (2012). Our divided political heart: The battle for the American idea in an age of discontent. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Doehring, C. (2012) After the shooting: A spiritual care conversation. Colorado Public Radio.|After_The_Shooting_A_Spiritual_Conversation. Accessed 30 April 2013.
  5. Graham, L. K. (2006). Pastoral theology and catastrophic disaster. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 16(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, L. K. (2011). Narratives of families, faith, and nation: Insights from research. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 21(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Graham, L. K. (2000). Pastoral theology as public theology in relation to the clinic. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 10, 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, L. K. (2012). Review of trauma and transformation at Ground Zero: A pastoral theology. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 22(2), 7-1–7-9.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, L. K. (2013). Revisiting family narratives of war through courageous collaborative pastoral conversations. Reflective practice: Formation and Supervision in Ministry, 34, 66–75.Google Scholar
  10. Gunn, T. J. (2009). Spiritual weapons: The cold war and the forging of an American national religion. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Leslie, K. J. (2008). Pastoral care in a new public: Lessons learned in the public square. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 18(2), 80–99.Google Scholar
  13. Miller-McLemore, B. J. (2004). Pastoral theology as public theology: Revolutions in the ‘fourth area.’ In N. J. Ramsay (Ed.), Pastoral care and counseling: Redefining the paradigms (pp. 45–64). Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  14. O’Connor, K. M. (2002). Lamentations and the tears of the world. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  15. Swain, S. (2011). Trauma and transformation at Ground Zero: A pastoral theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  16. Watson, P. J., Brymer, M. J., & Bonanno, G. A. (2011). Postdisaster psychological intervention since 9/11. American Psychologist, 66(6), 482–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Westen, D. (2007). The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  18. Zunin L. M., & Myers, D. (2000). Training manual for human service workers in major disasters. (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services. DHHS Publication No. ADM 90–538. Accessed 31 January 2005.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Iliff School of TheologyDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations