Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 515–531 | Cite as

A Lacanian Ethics of Non-Personal Responsibility



It is widely believed that Jacques Lacan fails to explain adequately how the subject, allegedly no more than an effect of signifiers in the Symbolic order, can take responsibility for her actions. I argue that the subject can find an appropriate measure for her actions in an awareness of the role her desire plays in her self- and world-constitution. I propose a measure derived from Simone Weil’s ethics of decreation: the subject accepts a “non-personal” symbolic understanding of herself that opens up space in her world of signifiers for all that is unknown, threatening, or demanding about the other’s desire. Lacan’s critics must therefore respond to Weil’s contention that ethics requires almost no “self” at all.


Jacques Lacan Simone Weil Ethics Responsibility Psychoanalysis 



A version of this paper was presented at the conference on “Psychology and the Other” held at Lesley University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in October 2011. I would like to thank the conference participants, as well as anonymous reviewers, for their helpful comments and suggestions. I owe an immeasurable debt to the outstanding teaching of Jeffrey Bloechl and William Richardson, both of whom taught courses on Lacan at Boston College. I take sole responsibility, however, for any infelicities or inaccuracies in my interpretation of Lacan.


  1. Cameron, S. (2003). The practice of attention: Simone Weil’s performance of impersonality. Critical Inquiry, 29, 216–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Kesel, M. (2009). Eros and ethics: Reading Jacques Lacan’s Seminar VII. Trans. S. Jöttkandt. Albany: State University of New York Press. (Orig. pub. 2001.)Google Scholar
  3. de Lussy, F. (2004). To on: A nameless something over which the mind stumbles. In E. Doering & E. O. Springsted (Eds.), The Christian Platonism of Simone Weil (pp. 115–132). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, D. (1998). From Kantian ethics to mystical experience: An exploration of jouissance. In D. Nobus (Ed.), Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis (pp. 1–28). London: Rebus Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fink, B. (1999). A clinical introduction to Lacanian psychoanalysis: Theory and technique. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fink, B. (2004). Lacan to the letter: Reading Écrits closely. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In S. Freud, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, J. Strachey (Ed. and trans.) (pp. 283–391). London: Hogarth Press. (Orig. pub. 1895.)Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, J. (1987). Introduction to the Names-of-the-Father seminar, Ed. J.-A. Miller, Trans. J. Mehlman, October, 40, 81–95. (Orig. pub. 1963.)Google Scholar
  11. Lacan, J. (1991). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis, 1954–1955. Trans. S. Tomaselli. New York: W. W. Norton. (Orig. pub. 1978.)Google Scholar
  12. Lacan, J. (1992). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959–1960. Trans. D. Porter. New York: W. W. Norton. (Orig. pub. 1986.)Google Scholar
  13. Lacan, J. (1993). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III: The psychoses, 1955–1956. Trans. R. Grigg. New York: W. W. Norton. (Orig. Pub. 1981.)Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, J. (2002a). Écrits: A selection. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Lacan, J. (2002b). The seminar of Jacques Lacan VI: Desire and its interpretation. Trans. C. Gallagher. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  16. Little, J. P. (1993). Simone Weil’s concept of decreation. In R. Bell (Ed.), Simone Weil’s philosophy of culture: Readings toward a divine humanity (pp. 25–51). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Neill, C. (2011). Lacanian ethics and the assumption of subjectivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roazen, P. (1996). Lacan’s first disciple. Journal of Religion and Health, 35, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheperdson, C. (2008). Lacan and the limits of language. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vetö, M. (1994). The religious metaphysics of Simone Weil. Trans. J. Dargan. Dargan. Albany: State University of New York Press. (Orig. pub. 1971.)Google Scholar
  21. Weil, S. (1956). The notebooks of Simone Weil. 2 vols. Trans. Α. Wills. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Weil, S. (1970). First and last notebooks. Trans. R. Rees. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Orig. pub. 1950.)Google Scholar
  23. Weil, S. (2001). Waiting for God. Trans. E. Craufurd. New York: Harper. (Orig. pub. 1951.)Google Scholar
  24. Weil, S. (2002). Gravity and grace. Trans. E. Craufurd. London: Routledge. (Orig. pub. 1947.)Google Scholar
  25. Zupančič, A. (2000). Ethics of the real: Kant, Lacan. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations