Abstract
In contemporary scholarship, the psychology of religion involves the scientific study of religious life. Traditionally, psychologists have pursued a strikingly individualistic approach to their study of the topic, which seems at odds with the emphasis on groups or society in most definitions of religion. What would happen if we took this relational aspect of religion seriously? The paper investigates the question by asking (1) how might the underlying philosophy of science for the field differ if we took a more relational approach to the topic, and (2) how might our altered assumptions affect the scientific study of religion in psychology. The result is a modest proposal for a community-oriented psychology of religion that embraces a greater diversity of methods and a sharper emphasis on goals that will be directly beneficial to the people we study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andresen, J. (2000). Meditation meets behavioural medicine: The story of experimental research on meditation. In J. Andresen & R. K. C. Forman (Eds.), Cognitive models and spiritual maps: Interdisciplinary explorations of religious experience (pp. 17–73). Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
Austin, J. (2006). Zen-brain reflections. Cambridge: MIT.
Balswick, J., King, P., & Reimer, K. (2005). The reciprocating self: Human development in theological perspective. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Basil, St. (1999). Ascetical works (Trans: M. Wagner). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Benedict, St. (2001). The rule of St. Benedict (Trans: L. Doyle). Collegeville: Liturgical Press.
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Verso. (Original work published 1974).
Caspi, O., & Burleson, K. (2005). Methodological challenges in meditation research. Advances, 21, 4–11.
Douglas, M. (1996). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London: Routledge.
Enright, R. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hazra, K. L. (1988). Constitution of the Buddhist sangha. Delhi: B. R. Publishing.
Hobbes, T. (1991). Leviathan. Ed. R. Tuck. New York: Cambridge University. (Original work published 1651).
Hood, R., Jr., Hill, P., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Hopewell, J. (1987). Congregation: Stories and structures. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
James, W. (1961). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier. (Original work published 1902).
James, W. (1996). A pluralistic universe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1909).
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1962).
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers, Volume 1. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1999). Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locke, J. (2003). Two treatises of government. Ed I. Shapiro. New Haven: Yale University. (Original work published 1689).
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Nelson, J. M. (2006). Missed opportunities in dialogue between psychology and religion. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 205–216.
Nelson, J. (2009). Psychology, religion, and spirituality. New York: Springer.
Nelson, J., & Slife, B. (2012). Theoretical and epistemological foundations of the psychology of religion. In L. Miller (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Religion & Spirituality. New York: Oxford University Press. (in press).
Paloutzian, R., & Park, C. (2005). Integrative themes in the current science of the psychology of religion. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford.
Pargament, K. I., Silverman, W., Johnson, S., Echemendia, R., & Snyder, S. (1983). The psycho-social climate of religious congregations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 351–381.
Park, C., & Paloutzian, R. (2005). One step toward integration and an expansive future. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 550–564). New York: Guilford.
Piedmont, R., & Leach, M. (2002). Cross-cultural generalizability of the spiritual transcendence scale in India. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 1888–1901.
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rea, M. (2002). World without design: The ontological consequences of naturalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rizzuto, A.-M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Slife, B. D., & Reber, J. S. (2009). Is there a pervasive implicit bias against theism in psychology? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 63–79.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Steinbock, A. (2004). Personal givenness and cultural a prioris. In D. Carr & C. Chan-Fai (Eds.), Space, time, and culture (pp. 159–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177.
Williams, B. (2003). The worldview dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 370–374.
Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385–418.
Worthington, E. L., Jr., Miller, A., & Talley, J. (2011). Action-oriented research: A primer and examples. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 39, 211–221.
Zizioulas, J. (2006). Communion and otherness: Further studies in personhood and the church. Ed. P. McPartlan, London: T & T Clark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, J.M. Taking Community Seriously: A Theory and Method for a Community-Oriented Psychology of Religion. Pastoral Psychol 61, 851–863 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0454-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0454-z