Advertisement

Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 351–360 | Cite as

A Semiotic Comparison Between Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ and Pier Paolo Pasolini’s The Gospel According to Saint Matthew

  • Massimo Leone
Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to draw a comparison between Mel Gibson’s and Pier Paolo Pasolini’s filmic representations of the Passion of Jesus through semiotic instruments of analysis.

Keywords

The Passion of the Christ The Gospel According to Saint Matthew Mel Gibson Pier Paolo Pasolini Christ in Cinema Semiotics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1970). S. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  2. Burnham, J. (Ed.). (2004). Perspectives on the Passion of the Christ—religious thinkers and writers explore the issues raised by the controversial movie. New York: Miramax Books.Google Scholar
  3. Calabrese, O. (1985). Il linguaggio dell’arte. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  4. Dusi, N., & Nergaard, S. (Eds.). (2000). Sulla traduzione intersemiotica. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  5. Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  6. Eco, U. (2003). Dire quasi la stessa cosa. Esperienze di traduzione. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  7. Gance, A. (1927). Le temps de l’image est venu. L’art cinématographique, 2.Google Scholar
  8. Greimas, A. J., & Courtès, J. (1979). Sémiotique—Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  9. Metz, C. (1968). Essais sur la signification au cinéma. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  10. Sawyer, D. (2004) Mel Gibson’s Passion: an interview with Mel Gibson. ABC News; MPI Media Group (DVD).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesUniversity of SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations