Skip to main content
Log in

LPI radar network optimization based on geometrical measurement fusion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The power optimization problem and target assignment are investigated to improve low probability of interception (LPI) in a distributed radar network system. The target geometrical localization error and probability of detection are considered as QoS metrics of the network. We introduce geometrical fusion gain as a metric to fuse information for measuring target localization by multiple radars. The problem is then considered as an optimization challenge based on measurement error covariance ellipses, which satisfy detection and localization accuracy of the network. The LPI problem can be solved with two different objectives for the optimization as it minimizes the maximum power and cuts down on total power. Due to the combinatorial nonconvex and nonlinear nature of the optimization problems, relaxations are considered to make the problems more tractable. They can be efficiently solved by dividing them into two subproblems. Firstly, there is the power allocation in which a framework is proposed to compute minimum required power for a radar assignment scheme by applying a numerical method. Secondly, there is the radar assignment in which a heuristic assignment algorithm is suggested to acquire sufficient radar-to-target assignment based on calculated power. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithms considerably improve LPI performance while detection probability and target localization error constraints can be satisfied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aittomki T, Godrich H, Poor HV, Koivunen V (2011) Resource allocation for target detection in distributed MIMO radars. In: 2011 conference record of the forty fifth Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR). IEEE, pp 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2011.6190133

  • Andargoli SMH, Malekzadeh J (2017) LPI optimization framework for search radar network based on information fusion. Aerosp Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2009) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–273

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty SR (2008) Development and performance evaluation of a multistatic radar system. PhD dissertation, University of London, pp 22–60

  • Du K-L, Swamy MNS (2016) Search and optimization by metaheuristics: techniques and algorithms inspired by nature. Birkhuser, Cham

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Godrich H, Haimovich AM, Blum RS (2008) Cramer Rao bound on target localization estimation in MIMO radar systems. In: 42nd annual conference on information sciences and systems, 2008. CISS 2008. IEEE, pp 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS.2008.4558509

  • Godrich H, Petropulu AP, Poor HV (2011) Power allocation strategies for target localization in distributed multiple-radar architectures. IEEE Trans Signal Process 59(7):3226–3240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2011.2144976

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koch W (2013) Tracking and sensor data fusion: methodological framework and selected applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Gao X, Li B (2014) A study on search strategies of netted surveillance radar. In: International conference on logistics engineering, management and computer science (LEMCS 2014). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/lemcs-14.2014.54

  • Ma B, Chen H, Sun B, Xiao H (2014) A joint scheme of antenna selection and power allocation for localization in MIMO radar sensor networks. Commun Lett IEEE 18(12):2225–2228. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2365206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri F (2006) Introduction to electronic defense systems. SciTech Publishing, Raleigh, pp 24–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop Grumman (n.d.) AWACS Surveillance Radar: The Eyes of the Eagle. Falls Church, Va, Northrop Grumman. http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/AWACSAPY2/Documents/AWACS.pdf

  • Pace PE (2009) Detecting and classifying low probability of intercept radar. Artech House, Boston, pp 3–37, 316–360

  • Rice SO (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Tech J 23(3):282–332

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Richards MA, Scheer JA, Holm WA (2010) Principles of modern radar: basic principles. SciTech Publishing, Raleigh, pp 87–111, 677–710

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rihaczek AW (1969) Principles of high-resolution radar. McGraw-Hill

  • Shi C, Zhou J, Wang F, Chen J (2013) Target threatening level based optimal power allocation for LPI radar network. In: Instrumentation and measurement, sensor network and automation (IMSNA). IEEE, pp 634–637. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMSNA.2013.6743357

  • Shi C, Wang F, Sellathurai M, Zhou J (2014) LPI optimization framework for target tracking in radar network architectures using information-theoretic criteria. Int J Antennas Propag. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/654561

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng Y (2010) Fundamental aspects of netted radar performance. PhD dissertation, UCL (University College London), pp 35–73

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mehdi Hosseini Andargoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini Andargoli, S.M., Malekzadeh, J. LPI radar network optimization based on geometrical measurement fusion. Optim Eng 20, 119–150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-018-9401-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-018-9401-x

Keywords

Navigation