Low-Frequency Noise Characterization in Charge-Based Coherent Nanodevices
Low-frequency noise has been recognized as the main mechanism of decoherence in present-day solid state coherent nanodevices. Often low-frequency noise has a 1/f spectrum, thus the responsible degrees of freedom are almost static during the coherent time evolution of the device. Their effect is to reduce the amplitude of the measured signal by an effect analogous to inhomogeneous broadening in NMR. Here we present a way to characterize effects of adiabatic noise exploiting the tunability of nanodevices. The results apply in principle to many implementations of quantum bits, and are particularly suited for solid state devices. The accurate characterization of the physics of the noise sources represents the first step toward the design specific strategies to eliminate their effects.
KeywordsNoise Source Quantum Noise Spontaneous Decay Exact Diagonalization Solid State Device
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Y. Yu, S. Han, X. Chu, S. Chu and Z. Wang, Science 296, 889 (2002); J.M. Martinis, S. Nam, J. Aumentado and C. Urbina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002); I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans and J. E. Mooij, Science 299, 1869 (2003); T. Duty, D. Gunnarsson, K. Bladh and P. Delsing, Phys. Rev. B 69, 140503 (R) (2004); O. Astafiev, Yu.A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, Y. Nakamura and J. S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. B 69, 180507 (R.) (2004).Google Scholar
- G. Falci, E. Paladino and R. Fazio, Decoherence in Josephson qubits, in: Quantum Phenomena of Mesoscopic Systems, V. Tognetti and B. Altshuler, eds., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar
- E. Paladino, L. Faoro and G. Falci, Adv. Solid State Phys. 43, 747 (2003).Google Scholar
- C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.Google Scholar
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
- G. Falci et al. in preparation.Google Scholar
- G. M. Palma, K. A. Suominen and A. K. Ekert Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 452, (567) 1996.Google Scholar
- T. Duty, G. Johansson, K. Bladh, D. Gunnarsson, C. Wilson and P. Delsing, cond-mat/0503531.Google Scholar