Open Economies Review

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 683–710 | Cite as

The Euro Area Crisis: Need for a Supranational Fiscal Risk Sharing Mechanism?

  • Davide Furceri
  • Aleksandra Zdzienicka
Research Article


The aim of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of risk sharing mechanisms in the euro area and whether a supranational fiscal risk sharing mechanism could insure countries against very severe downturns. Using an unbalanced panel of 15 euro area countries over the period 1979–2010, the results of the paper show that: (i) the effectiveness of risk sharing mechanisms in the euro area is significantly lower than in existing federations (such as the U.S. and Germany) and (ii) it falls sharply in severe downturns just when it is needed most; (iii) a supranational fiscal stabilization mechanism, financed by a relatively small contribution, would be able to fully insure euro area countries against very severe, persistent and unanticipated downturns.


Risk sharing mechanisms Consumption smoothing channels Fiscal union 

JEL Classification

F41 F32 F36 



The authors would like to thank Celine Allard, Jochen Andritzky, Alan Auerbach, Roel Beetsma, Ansgar Belke, Helge Berger, Olivier Blanchard, John Bluedorn, Xavier Debrun, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, Jana Grittersova, Daniel Gros, Jules Leichter, Prakash Loungani, Franziska Ohnsorge, Tigran Poghosyan, Frank Smets, Livio Stracca, participants to the conference Fiscal Policy and Coordination in Europe (Central Bank of Slovakia) and the ECB/IMF conference Reforming EU Fiscal Governance, for very useful discussions and suggestions. We are also grateful to the editor George Tavlas and to two anonymous referees for useful comments. Shanti Karunaratne provided excellent editorial assistance.


  1. Afonso A, Furceri D (2008) EMU enlargement stabilization costs and insurance mechanisms. J Int Money Financ 27(2):169–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arreaza A, Sorensen BE, Yosha O (1998) “Consumption smoothing through fiscal policy in OECD and EU countries”, NBER working papers No. 6372. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Asdrubali P, Sorensen BE, Yosha O (1996) Channels of interstate risk sharing: United States 1963–90. Q J Econ 111(4):1081–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanasoulis SG, van Wincoop E (2001) Risk sharing within the United States: what do financial markets and fiscal federalism accomplish? Rev Econ Stat 83(4):688–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkeson A, Bayoumi T (1993) Do private capital markets insure regional risk? Evidence from the United States and Europe. Open Econ Rev 4:303–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldacci E, Kumar MS (2010) “Fiscal deficits, public debt, and sovereign bond yields,” IMF Working Paper No. 184 (International Monetary Fund)Google Scholar
  7. Baldacci E, Gupta S, Mulas-Granados C (2009) “How effective is fiscal policy response in systemic banking crises?,” IMF Working Paper No. 160 (International Monetary Fund).Google Scholar
  8. Baxter M, Crucini MJ (1995) Business cycles and the asset structure of foreign trade. Int Econ Rev 36(4):821–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayoumi T, Michael WK (1997) A provincial view of economic integration. IMF Staff Pap 44(4):534–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck N, Katz JN (1995a) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):634–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck N, Katz JN (1995b) Nuisance vs substance: specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section data. Polit Anal 6(1):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boadway R (2004) The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Econ Stud 50(1):211–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bordo MD, Markiewicz A, Jonung L (2011) “A fiscal union for the euro. Some lessons from history?”, NBER working paper No. 17380. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan JM, Flowers MR (1987) The public finances, an introductory textbook, 6th edn. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  15. Bucovetsky S (1998) Federalism, equalization, and risk aversion. J Public Econ 67(3):301–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell JY, Mankiw GN (1987) Are output fluctuations transitory? Q J Econ 102(4):957–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canova F, Ravn MO (1996) International consumption risk sharing. Int Econ Rev 37(3):857–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Commission of the EC (1977) Report of the Study Group on the Role of the Public Finances in European Integration (MacDougal Report), Vols. 1 and 2. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  19. Commission of the EC (1989) Report on economic and monetary union in the European community (Delors Report). BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. Crucini M (1999) On international and national dimensions of risk sharing. Rev Econ Stat 81(1):73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Del Negro M (2002) Asymmetric shocks among US states. J Int Econ 56(2):273–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farhi E, Werning I (2012) “Fiscal Unions”, NBER Working Paper 18280. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. French K, Poterba J (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Am Econ Rev 81(2):222–26Google Scholar
  24. Furceri D, Karras G (2007) Country size and business cycle volatility: scale really matters. J Jpn Int Econ 21(4):424–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furceri D, Zdzienicka A (2012) Banking crises and short and medium term output losses in emerging and developing countries: the role of structural and policy variables. World Dev 40(12):2369–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Furceri D, Zdzienicka A (2013) “The consequences of banking crises on public debt: International Finance (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  27. Gali J, Perotti R (2003) Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe. Econ Policy 18(37):533–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giofré M (2012) Convergence of EMU Equity Portfolios. Open Econ Rev 23(2):381–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hammond G, von Hagen J (1995) Regional insurance against asymmetric shocks: an empirical study for the european community. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud 66((3)):331–53Google Scholar
  30. Harding D, Pagan A (2002) Dissecting the cycle: a methodological investigation. J Monet Econ 49(2):365–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hepp R, von Hagen J (2013) Interstate risk sharing in Germany: 1970-2006. Oxf Econ Pap 65(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoffmann M, Shcherbakova-Stewen I (2011) Consumption risk sharing over the business cycle: the role of small Firms’ access to credit markets. Rev Econ Stat 93(4):1403–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutchison M, Noy I, Wang L (2010) Fiscal and monetary policies and the cost of sudden stops. J Int Money Financ 29(6):973–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IMF (2004) Has Fiscal behavior changed under the European economic and monetary union?, World Economic Outlook, September Issue, Chapter 2Google Scholar
  35. Italianer A Vanheukelen M (1992) Proposals for Community Stabilization Mechanisms: Some Historical Applications, in the Economics of Community Public Finance, European Economy, Vol. 5, pp. 493–510Google Scholar
  36. Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sorensen B Luttini E (2014) Debt Crisis and Risk-Sharing: The role of Markets versus Sovereigns, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  37. Laeven L, Valencia F (2008) “Systemic banking crises: a new database”, IMF Working Paper, 224. International Monetary Fund, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Laeven L, Valencia F (2010) “Resolution of banking crises: the good, the Bad, and the ugly”. IMF working paper 146. International Monetary Fund, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Lane P, Milesi-Ferretti G (2008) The Drivers of Financial Globalization. Am Econ Rev 98(2):327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leibrecht M, Scharler J (2008) Reconsidering consumption risk sharing among OECD countries: some evidence based on panel cointegration. Open Econ Rev 19(4):493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lockwood B (1999) Inter-regional insurance. J Public Econ 72(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Melitz J, Vori S (1992) National Insurance Against Unevely Distributed Shocks in a Monetary Union”, CEPR Discussion Paper 697Google Scholar
  43. Mélitz J, Zumer F (1999) Interregional and international risk-sharing and lessons for EMU. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 51:149–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mélitz J, Zumer F (2002) Regional redistribution and stabilization by the center in Canada, France, the UK and the US: a reassessment and new tests. J Public Econ 86(2):263–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Persson T, Tabellini G (1996a) Federal fiscal constitutions: risk sharing and moral hazard. Econometrica 64(3):623–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Persson T, Tabellini G (1996b) Federal fiscal constitutions: risk sharing and redistribution. J Polit Econ 104(5):979–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pierucci E, Ventura L (2010) Risk sharing: a long Run issue? Open Econ Rev 21(5):705–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reinhart CM, Rogoff K (2008) “This time is different: a panoramic view of eight centuries of financial crises”, NBER Working Paper, 13882Google Scholar
  49. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2010) From financial crash to debt crises. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 15795Google Scholar
  50. Roodman D (2009) “How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata”. Stata J 9(1):86–136Google Scholar
  51. Schmitz M (2010) Financial markets and international risk sharing. Open Econ Rev 21(3):413–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sorensen B, Yosha O (1998) International risk sharing and european monetary unification. J Int Econ 45(2):211–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tesar LL, Werner IM (1995) Home bias and high turnover. J Int Money Financ 14(4):467–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. von Hagen J (1998) “Fiscal Policy and International Risk sharing”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 126Google Scholar
  55. Wildasin DE (1996) Introduction: fiscal aspects of evolving federations. Int Tax Public Financ 3:121–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolf, GB (2012) “A Budget for Europe’ Monetary Union,” Bruegel Policy Contribution, 2012/22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Monetary Fund and University of PalermoWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.International Monetary FundWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations