Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 163–166 | Cite as

Sexism and the City: Irrational Behaviour, Cognitive Errors and Gender in the Financial Crisis

  • Anne Sibert
Research Article
  • 233 Downloads

Many factors contributed to the current global financial crisis: an imperfect regulatory environment, a flawed system of credit ratings, inadequate deposit insurance systems and banking systems that were too large relative to national resources. Recent outrage, however, has been directed at one particular factor: the behaviour of the bankers. So badly were they perceived to have acted that in the United States, the US House of Representatives passed a bill that would effectively confiscate the 2008 bonuses of employees of financial firms receiving significant bailout assistance.1 In the United Kingdom, tabloid headlines refer to Sir Fred Goodwin as a ‘vulture’ and Commons Leader Harriet Harmon tried to insist that the government would the strip the RBS leader of his contractually agreed upon pension.

While much of the populist response has the feel of a witch hunt, it is hard to deny that certain aspects of the bankers’ conduct were undesirable. Bankers rashly counted on a continuation...

Keywords

Banking crisis Monetary policy 

JEL Classifications

E58 G21 

References

  1. Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence and common stock investment. Q J Econ 66:261–292Google Scholar
  2. Bernasek A, Shwiff S (2001) Gender, risk and retirement. J Econ Issues 35:345–356Google Scholar
  3. Beyer S (1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 59:960–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth AL, Nolan P (2009) Gender differences in risk behaviour: does nurture matter. CEPR Discussion Paper 7198, March 2009Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan D, Huczynski A (1997) Organizational behaviour. Prentice-Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell WK, Sedikides C (1999) Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: a meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology 3:23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coates JM, Herbert J (2008) Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:6167–6172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2002) Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evol Hum Behav 23:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenwick GD, Neal DJ (2001) Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gend Work Organ 8:205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen Z, Owan H, Pan J (2006) The impact of group diversity and team governance structure on performance—evidence from college classroom. NBER Working Paper 12251, 2006Google Scholar
  11. Hersch J (1996) Smoking, seat belts and other risky consumer decisions: differences by gender and race. Managerial Decis Econ 5:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am Econ Rev 92:1644–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jianakoplas NA, Bernasek A (1998) Are women more risk averse? Econ Inq 36:620–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lundeberg MA, Fox PW, Punccohar J (1994) Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgements. J Educ Psychol 86:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Orlitzky M, Benjamin JD (2003) The effects of sex composition on small-group performance in a business school case composition. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2:128–138Google Scholar
  16. Sabourian H, Sibert A (2008) Banker compensation and confirmation bias. CEPR Working Paper no. 7263, Apr. 2008Google Scholar
  17. Schubert R, Brown M, Gyster M, Brachinger HW (1999) Financial decision making: are women really more risk averse? Am Econ Rev 89:381–385Google Scholar
  18. Sullivan K, Jordan M (2009) In banking crisis, buys get the blame: more women needed in top jobs, critics say. Washington Post Foreign Service, 11 Feb. 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.CEPRLondonUK

Personalised recommendations