Between morality and rationality: framing end-of-life care policy through narratives
- 254 Downloads
This paper analyzes the nature of the debate generated prior to the implementation of the Act Respecting End-of-Life Care in 2015 in Québec (Canada). Including medical assistance in dying (MAID) along existing palliative care services, the act is an important policy change on a very sensitive issue. As such, MAID could be categorized as a morality policy issue, the latter being defined as a particular category of policy because of its specific features (issues of first principle, technical simplicity, high salience, public interest, and public participation). In line with Mucciaroni’s proposition, we rather analyze this issue by understanding morality policy as one of two framing strategies (moral and/or rational-instrumental frame). Our research reconstructs four public opinion framings as advanced and transmitted through the media between 2005 and 2015. It shows that although opponents to the bill unsurprisingly framed the debate in deontological terms, mostly referring to sanctity of life as one of the most important values in society, they also framed it on rational-instrumental grounds in a similar proportion, alleging the danger of a slippery slope and potential abuse. As well, if some of the proponents favored a moral framing centered on the argument that dignity and individual autonomy take precedence over all other values, others put forward a rational-instrumental one, where the slippery slope/abuse argument is used as a cautionary statement against the artificial prolongation of life. Our analysis reinforces Mucciaroni’s and Ferraiolo’s assertions that sensitive issues classified as morality policy cannot be apprehended solely through the unidimensional frame of morality.
KeywordsEnd-of-life Medical assistance in dying Public policy Framing Morality policy
- Abric, J.-C. (1994). Pratiques et représentations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
- Angus Reid (2010). Majority of Canadians Support Legalizing Euthanasia, February 2010 [Canada]. [Data set]. http://angusreid.org/majority-of-canadians-support-legalizing-euthanasia/. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Angus Reid (2016). Physician-Assisted Suicide: Canadians reject certain Commons committee recommendations, http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2016.04.01-Physician-Assisted-Suicide.pdf. Accessed Jan 9 2018.
- Assemblée nationale (2012). Mourir dans la dignité, Rapport de la Commission spéciale sur la question spéciale de mourir dans la dignité, Québec, http://www.rpcu.qc.ca/pdf/documents/rapportcsmd.pdf. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Bowen, E. A. (2012). Clean needles and bad blood: Needle exchange as morality policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 38(2), 121–141.Google Scholar
- Braun, D. & Jörgens, H. (2013). U.S. climate policy as morality policy. In Paper presented at the first international conference on public policy. Grenoble, June 26–28.Google Scholar
- Castra, M. (2013). Fin de vie et réorganisation des liens familiaux. Accompagner un proche en soins palliatifs. In S. Gaudet, N. Burlone (Eds.), Repenser les familles et ses transitions. Repenser les politiques publiques (pp. 233–249). Presses de l’Université Laval: Québec.Google Scholar
- Gailey, E. A. (2003). Write to death: News framing of the right to die conflict, From Quinlan’s Coma to Kevorkian’s conviction. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Giroux, M. T. (2012). Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384. Frontières, 24(1–2), 18–30.Google Scholar
- Glick, H. R., & Huchinson, A. (2001). Physician-assisted suicide: Agenda setting and the elements of morality policy. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 55–72). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Government of Canada (2005). Bill 407: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity), 38th Parliament, 1st Session, Parliament of Canada, 5p. http://www.parl.ca/Content/Bills/381/Private/C-407/c-407_1/c-407_1.pdf. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Government of Canada (2013). Euthanasia and assisted suicide in Canada, Library of Parliament, Background Papers 2010-68-E. https://lop.parl.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-68-e.pdf. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Government of Canada (2015). Carter Case v. Canada. The supreme court of Canada decision’s on assisted dying, Library of Parliament, Background Papers 2015-47-E. https://lop.parl.ca/content/lop/ResearchPublications/2015-47-e.pdf. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Government of Canada (2016). Legislative Background: Medical Assistance in Dying (Bill C-14, as Assented to on June 17, 2016). Department of Justice, 58 p. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/adra-amsr/adra-amsr.pdf. Accessed July 25 2017.
- Green-Pedersen, C. (2007). The conflict of conflicts in comparative perspective: Euthanasia as a political issue in Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Comparative Politics, 39(3), 273–291.Google Scholar
- Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001). Morality in Congress? Legislative voting on gay issues”. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 115–129). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Haider-Markel, D., & Joselyn, M. R. (2004). Just how important is the messenger versus the message? The case of framing physician-assisted suicide. Death Studies, 28, 243–262.Google Scholar
- Holody, K.J. (2011). Constructing the end: Framing and Agenda-setting of physician-assisted suicide. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate College of Bowling Green.Google Scholar
- Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (1997). policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
- Iyengar, S., & Reeves, R. (1997). Do media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy sciences. Standford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
- Marcoux, I., Mishara, B. L., & Durand, C. (2007). Confusion between euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions influences on public opinion poll results. Revue canadienne de santé publique, 98(3), 235–239.Google Scholar
- Meier, K. J. (2001). Drugs, sex, and rock and roll: A theory of morality politics. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 21–36). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (2001). The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the U.S. states. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 170–183). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Mylchreest, I. (2001). Avoiding the issue down under: The politics of legalizing abortion in Australia. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Negura, L. (2006). L’analyse de contenu dans l’étude des représentations sociales. SociologieS. Théories et recherches, http//sociologies.revues.org/index993.html. Accessed Oct 15 2016.Google Scholar
- Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (2001). Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-Roe abortion policy. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 143–159). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2012). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pierce, P. A., & Miller, D. E. (2001). Variations in the diffusion of state lottery adoptions: How revenue dedication changes morality politics. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 160–169). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Québec (2017). Act Respecting End-of-life Care, RLRQ, chapter S-32.0001, Updated to March 1, 2017, [Québec], Éditeur officiel du Québec.Google Scholar
- Schoën, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., Hathaway, P. L., & Arnell, R. J. (2008). Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory, Policy Sciences, 41, 115–138.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. A., & Tatalovich, R. (2003). Cultures at war: Moral conflicts in western democracies. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- Snow, D. (2009). From commission to conception: Commercial surrogacy and morality policy in Canada. M.A. thesis. Calgary: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
- Snow, D. (2014a). Failure to reproduce: Assisted reproductive technology policy in Canada. Ph.D. diss.. Calgary: University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
- Studlar, D. T. (2001). What constitutes morality policy? A cross-national analysis. In C. Z. Mooney (Ed.), The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy (pp. 37–51). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Volant, E. (2012). Les auditions de la Commission spéciale sur la question de mourir dans la dignité dans trois villes du Québec. L’aide médicale à mourir, 24(1–2), 113–117.Google Scholar