Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on agenda change affecting the politics of “fracking operations” in the US, a process of extracting natural gas from underground shale formations. We examine how the movement of this policy issue between the state and federal levels of government has become increasingly contentious because of rising public concern about pollution impacts. Using information obtained from documentary sources and media content analysis, we found that the natural gas policy coalition has largely focused on a political strategy based on maintaining fracking regulatory controls at the state level, while the environmental policy coalition has pushed for increased regulation of drilling practices in general, including a larger policy and oversight role for federal agencies such as EPA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Associated Press. (2011). EPA implicates fracking in pollution.

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. (2004). The world changed today: Agenda-setting and policy change in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Review of Policy Research, 21(2), 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, A. O’. M. (2002). American federalism on the horizon. Publius, 32(2), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, A. O’. M., & Woods, N. D. (2010). Expanding the scope of conflict: Interest groups and interstate compacts. Social Science Quarterly, 91(3), 669–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civil Society Institute. (2010). Survey: Drinking water concerns fueling awareness among Americans of ‘fracking’ used to extract natural gas. The Civil Society Institute. http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org. Accessed 26 June 2011.

  • Clanton, B. (2011). Shell launches safe shale blueprint for industry. The Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com. Accessed 30 June 2011.

  • Clanton, B. (2011). Oil industry pr reps to meet in Houston to coordinate message on fracking. Fuel Fix. http://fuelfix.com. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

  • Cobb, R., & Elder C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agendabuilding (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Cobb, R., & Primo, D. (2003). The plane truth: Airline crashes, the media, and transportation policy (p. 2003). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Ross, M. H. (1997a). Agenda setting and the denial of agenda access: Key concepts. In R. W. Cobb & M. H. Ross (Eds.), Cultural strategies of agenda denial: Avoidance, attack, and redefinition (pp. 3–24). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Ross, M. H. (1997b). Denying agenda access: Strategic considerations. In R. W. Cobb & M. H. Ross (Eds.), Cultural strategies of agenda denial: Avoidance, attack, and redefinition (pp. 25–48). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. H. (1993). Energy politics (4th ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (2012). The politics of “fracking”: Regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhy, J. A., & Crocker, R. (2011). Texas house approves fracking disclosure bill. The Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com. Accessed 12 May 2011.

  • Eisner, M., Worsham, J., & Ringquist, E. (2006). Contemporary regulatory policy (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy in Depth. (2011). Democratic Colorado Governor on NYT shale gas series: ‘Full of misinformation, all Hyperbole, No Science’. Energy in Depth. http://www.energyindepth.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  • Florestano, P. S. (1994). Past and present utilization of interstate compacts in the United States. Publius, 24(4), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. R., & Kollman, K. (2004). Authority migration: Defining an emerging research agenda. Political Science and Politics, 37(3), 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ground Water Protection Council and ALL Consulting. (2009). Modern shale gas development in the United States: A primer. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, and the National Energy Technology Laboratory. DOE Award No. DE-FG26-04NT15455.

  • Hall, B., & Jones, B. (1997). Agenda denial and issue containment in the regulation of financial securities: The SEC, 1933–1995. In R. W. Cobb & M. H. Ross (Eds.), Cultural strategies of agenda denial: Avoidance, attack, and redefinition (pp. 40–69). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, G. (2011). Playing defense: Early responses to conflict expansion in the oil sands policy subsystem. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D., & Houston, L., Jr. (2000). The politics of air bag safety: A competition among problem definitions. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IHS Global Insight. (2009). Measuring the economic and energy impacts of proposals to regulate hydraulic fracturing. Report prepared for the American Petroleum Institute.

  • John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, Brown: Little.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, J. (2010). Fears of pervasive air pollution stir up politics in Texas shale gas country. ClimateWire/Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 2 Aug 2011.

  • Klyza, C. M., & Sousa, D. (2008). American environmental policy, 1990–2006: Beyond gridlock. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, R. (2004). Coastal oil pollution: Spills, crisis, and policy change, Review of Policy Research, 21(2).

  • Lowry, W. (2008). Disentangling energy policy from environmental policy. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1195–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, A. (2009a). Industry defends federal loophole for drilling before packed Congressional hearing. ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org. Accessed 5 June 2011.

  • Lustgarten, A. (2009b). Energy industry sways Congress with misleading data. ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org. Accessed 8 July 2011.

  • Lustgarten, A., & Kusnetz, N. (2011). Does an old EPA fracking study provide proof of contamination? ProPublica. http://www.propublica.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2011.

  • Mandel, J. (2010). Fracking solids should be treated as hazwaste—study. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 29 Oct 2011.

  • Maykuth, A. (2012). More states ordering disclosure of fracking chemicals. Philadelphia Inquirer.

  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mufson, S. (2012). Can the shale gas boom save Ohio? Washington Post.

  • O’Meara, D. (2011). Encana cites ‘critical mistakes’ in U.S. EPA’s fracturing study. Edmonton Journal.

  • Pralle, S. (2006a). Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralle, S. (2006b). The “mouse that roared”: Agenda setting in Canadian pesticides politics. Policy Studies Journal, 34(2), 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. (2011). Contested federalism and American climate policy. Publius, 41(3), 494–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B., & Mundo, P. (2007). Business influence in state-level environmental policy. In M. Kraft & S. Kamieniecki (Eds.), Business and environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. (2011). California bill would reveal chemicals used in ‘fracking’ process. The Los Angeles Times. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com. Accessed 23 June 2011.

  • Saundry, P. (2009). Hydraulic fracturing. In C. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of earth. National Council for Science and the Environment: Washington, DC http://www.eoearth.org/article/Hydraulicfracturing/. Accessed 8 Mar 2011.

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Hinsdale: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheberle, D. (1994). Radon and asbestos: A study of agenda setting and causal stories. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2).

  • Scheberle, D. (2004). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soraghan, M. (2010a). BP, others push against federal regulation of fracturing. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 23 Mar 2010.

  • Soraghan, M. (2010b). In fracking debate, ‘disclosure’ is in the eye of the beholder. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 21 June 2010.

  • Soraghan, M. (2010c). Company’s disclosure decision could change fracking debate. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 15 July 2010.

  • Soraghan, M. (2010d). Northeast regulator eases proposed drilling curbs. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 9 Dec 2010.

  • Soraghan, M. (2010e). API endorses state-based fracking disclosure. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 14 Dec 2010.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011a). EPA pushes back on reports it changed fracking rules. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 20 Jan 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011b). EPA starts work on diesel fracking guidance. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 29 Apr 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011c). Fracking study to face fire at science hearing. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 9 May 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011d). Baffled about fracking? You’re not alone. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 13 May 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011e). Frack study’s safety findings exaggerated, Bush EPA official says. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 20 May 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011f). Fracking rules for diesel likely to spread nationally. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 14 June 2011.

  • Soraghan, M. (2011g). Interior to propose frack regs in ‘couple of months.’ Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.

  • Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Sullivan, C. (2011). Delaware river basin commission unveils broad fracking regulations. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 8 Nov 2011.

  • Taylor, P. (2010a). Fracking chemicals posted on Wyoming agency website. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 10 Mar 2011.

  • Taylor, P. (2010b). Hastings wants Interior chief to explain fracking plans. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 1 Dec 2011.

  • Taylor, P., & Soraghan, M. (2010). Interior to consider disclosure rules for fracking fluids. Environment & Energy Publishing. http://www.eenews.net. Accessed 30 Nov 2010.

  • Urbina, I. (2011a). Politics seen to limit EPA in the regulation of natural gas. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/. Accessed 3 Mar 2011.

  • Urbina, I. (2011b). E.P.A. steps up scrutiny of pollution in Pennsylvania rivers. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/. Accessed 7 Mar 2011.

  • Urbina, I. (2011c). A tainted water well, and concern there may be more. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011.

  • US Energy Information Administration. (2011). Review of emerging resources: U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays.

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Hydraulic Fracturing. http://www.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing/ Accessed 17 Mar 2012.

  • Vachon, S., & Menz, F. (2006). The role of social, political, and economic interests in promoting state green electricity practices, Environmental Science & Policy.

  • Wilber, T. (2012). Under the surface: Fracking, fortunes, and the fate of the Marcellus Shale. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. O. (2011a). DeGette, Polis once again introduce FRAC Act to bring federal oversight to gas fracking. The Colorado Independent. http://coloradoindependent.com. Accessed 17 Mar 2011.

  • Williams, D. O. (2011b). Colorado gas activists point to old west Virginia fracking case as ‘Smoking Gun’. The Colorado Independent. http://coloradoindependent.com. Accessed 8 Aug 2011.

  • Wiseman, H. (2009). Untested waters: The rise of hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas production and the need to revisit regulation. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 20(115), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woock, R. (2011). State says diesel use in fracing ok, asserts water safety. Trinidad Times Independent. http://trinidad-times.com. Accessed 12 April 2011.

  • Zeller, T., Jr. (2011). Studies say natural gas has its own environmental problems. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/. Accessed 12 Apr 2011.

  • Zimmerman, J. (2002). Interstate cooperation: Compacts and administrative agreements. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    Charles Davis & Katherine Hoffer

Authors
  1. Charles Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine Hoffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, C., Hoffer, K. Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking. Policy Sci 45, 221–241 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9156-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9156-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation