Policy Sciences

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 221–243 | Cite as

An analysis of police traffic stops and searches in Kentucky: a mixed methods approach offering heuristic and practical implications



Is race a significant predictor of being searched by the police? Is race a significant predictor of having positive search results during traffic stop? We address these two questions by analyzing traffic stop data (n > 93,000) collected by two state and 24 local police agencies in a single state during the 2001 calendar year. Our findings show that race does correlate with a fruitful traffic stop but not in the manner that may be commonly thought. To supplement and better contextualize our quantitative findings, an exploratory study was then designed that used the focus group interviewing technique with groups of officers from five of the participating agencies to explore their perceptions of (1) traffic stops and searches and (2) public allegations of racial profiling and bias-based policing. The findings from this qualitative phase of the study highlighted the officers’ perceived role as community problem solvers “who profile problems and not people.” In tandem, this mixed-method approach was instrumental in advancing our knowledge of both the patterns and results from related searches, in addition to better contextualizing the underlying perceptions of officers regarding the use of race in “solving” community problems. The results from this combination of methodological approaches offer important heuristic and practical implications.


Racial profiling Traffic stops Bias-based policing Police–community relations 



The authors dedicate this article to the memory of the late Susette M. Talarico—scholar, mentor, and friend. Susette read the initial draft of our manuscript and offered insightful comments and constructive suggestions. We are also grateful to Barry Bozeman, Andrew Whitford, Tony Brown, Ellen Rubin, Paul Speer, Heather Davidson and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for improvement.


  1. Adams, G., & Balfour, D. (1998). Unmasking administrative evil. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, B., Bell, L., & Griffin, P. (1997). Teaching diversity and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alpert, G. P., Dunham, R. G., & Smith, M. R. (2007). Investigating profiling by the Miami-Dade Police Department: A multimethod approach. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 25–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00420.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amnesty International USA. (2004). Threat and humiliation: Racial profiling, domestic security, and human rights in the United States. New York, NY: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  5. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, D., & Barlow, M. H. (2002). Racial profiling: A survey of African-American police officers. Police Quarterly, 5, 334–358. doi: 10.1177/109861102129198183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, K. (2005). Assessing the counterfactual: The efficacy of drug interdiction absent racial profiling. Duke Law Review, 54, 1089–1141.Google Scholar
  8. Buerger, M. E., & Farrell, A. (2002). The evidence of racial profiling: Interpreting documented and unofficial sources. Police Quarterly, 5, 275–305.Google Scholar
  9. Byars, P., & Wilcox, J. (1991). Focus groups: A qualitative opportunity for researchers. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 63–77. doi: 10.1177/002194369102800105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Close, B. R., & Mason, P. L. (2003). Beyond the traffic stop: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and the decision to search. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  11. Cordner, G., Williams, B., & Zuniga, M. (2000). Vehicle stops for the year 2000: Executive summary. San Diego, CA: San Diego Police Department.Google Scholar
  12. DeMaris, A. (1995). A tutorial in logistic regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 956–968. doi: 10.2307/353415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunham, R., Alpert, G., Stroshire, M., & Bennett, K. (2005). Transforming citizens into suspects: Factors that influence police suspicion. Police Quarterly, 8, 366–393. doi: 10.1177/1098611105274539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durose, M., Schmitt, E., & Lanagan, P. (2005). Contacts between the police and the public: Findings from the 2002 national survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics/Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  15. Engel, R. S., & Calnon, J. M. (2004). Comparing benchmark methodologies for police-citizen contacts: Traffic stop data collection for the Pennsylvania state police. Police Quarterly, 7, 97–125. doi: 10.1177/1098611103257686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engel, R. S., Calnon, J. M., & Bernard, T. J. (2002). Theory and racial profiling: Shortcomings and future directions in research. Justice Quarterly, 19, 250–273. doi: 10.1080/07418820200095231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etzioni, A. (1996). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Goodey, J. (2006). Ethnic profiling, criminal (in)justice and minority populations. Critical Criminology, 14, 207–212. doi: 10.1007/s10612-006-9010-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, M. (1998). Drug crazy. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Gross, S. R., & Barnes, K. Y. (2002). Road work: Racial profiling and drug interdiction on the highway. Michigan Law Review, 101, 651–754. doi: 10.2307/1290469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, D. A. (2006). U.S. experiences with racial and ethnic profiling: History, current issues, and the future. Critical Criminology, 14, 213–239. doi: 10.1007/s10612-006-9011-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hernandez-Murillo, R., & Knowles, J. (2004). Racial profiling or racist policing: Bounds test for aggregate data. International Economic Review, 45, 959–989. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00293.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarrett, R. (1993). Interviewing with low-income minority populations. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 184–201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Jenkins, M. (1995). Fear of the Gangsta: African-American males and the criminal justice system. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Krueger, R. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Lamberth, J. (1996). A report to the ACLU. New York, NY: American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
  29. Langan, P., Greenfield, L. A., Smith, S., Durose, M., & Levin, D. (2001). Contacts between police and the public: Findings from the 1999 national survey, NCJ 184957.Google Scholar
  30. Lombroso, C. (1911). Crime: Its causes and remedies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  31. MacDonald, H. (2002). The racial profiling myth debunked. City Journal (New York, N.Y.), 12. Available at http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_2_the_racial_profiling.html.
  32. Meehan, A. J., & Ponder, M. C. (2002). Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling and African American motorists. Justice Quarterly, 19, 399–430. doi: 10.1080/07418820200095291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1989). Hierarchies and American ideals, 1900–1940. Academy of Management Review, 14, 250–256. doi: 10.2307/258419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Pampel, F. C. (2000). ‘Logistic regression: A primer’, Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Petrocelli, M., Piquero, A., & Smith, M. (2003). Conflict theory and racial profiling: An empirical analysis of police traffic stop data. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00195-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramirez, D., McDevitt, J., & Farrell, A. (2000). A resource guide on racial profiling data collection systems: Promising practices and lessons learned. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  38. Ridgeway, G. (2006). Assessing the effect of race bias in post-traffic stop outcomes using propensity scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 1–29. doi: 10.1007/s10940-005-9000-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rojek, J., Rosenfeld, R., & Decker, S. (2004). The influence of the driver’s race on traffic stops in Missouri. Police Quarterly, 7, 126–147. doi: 10.1177/1098611103260695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmitt, E., Lanagan, P., & Durose, M. (2002). Characteristics of drivers stopped by police, 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics/Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  41. Skolnick, J. (1975). Justice without trial. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, M., & Alpert, G. (2002). Searching for direction: Courts, social science, and the adjudication of racial profiling claims. Justice Quarterly, 19, 673–703. doi: 10.1080/07418820200095391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, M., & Petrocelli, M. (2001). Racial profiling? A multivariate analysis of police traffic stop data. Police Quarterly, 4, 4–27.Google Scholar
  44. Stahl, M. (2003). Unlawful entry: Examining racial profiling through police search practices. Unpublished Master’s of Science Thesis in Community Research and Action, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  45. State of New Jersey v. Pedro Soto, et al. (1996). 324 N.J. Super. 66, 734 A.2d 350.Google Scholar
  46. Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, J., & Whitney, G. (2002). Racial profiling: Is there an empirical basis? The Mankind Quarterly, 42, 285–312.Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003). Social and demographic statistics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000). Racial profiling: Limited data available on motorist stops. Report to the Honorable James E. Clyburn, Chairman, Congressional Black Caucus. GAO/GGD-00-41. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. Walker, S. (2001). Searching for the denominator: Problems with police traffic stops data and an early warning system solution. Justice Research and Policy, 3, 63–95. doi: 10.3818/JRP.3.1.2001.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb, G. (1999). DWB. Esquire (New York, N.Y.), April, 118–127.Google Scholar
  52. Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. (1999). Race, class and perceptions of discrimination by the police. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 494–507. doi: 10.1177/0011128799045004006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class and personal experience. Criminology, 40, 435–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00962.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams, B. (1998). Citizen perspectives on community policing: A case study in Athens. Georgia, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, B. (2000). Racial profiling: The personal costs and societal consequences of driving while black: Implications for the minority academic community. In L. Jones (Ed.), Brothers of the academy: Earning our way (pp. 263–276). Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, H., & Murphy, P. V. (1990). The evolving strategy of policing: A minority view. In Perspectives on policing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration & PolicyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Law SchoolStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations