Policy Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 2–3, pp 159–176 | Cite as

The fertile soil for policy learning

  • Janet E. Frantz
  • Hajime Sato


Early in the 20th century, both Japan and the United States adopted isolation as the primary policy for leprosy victims. Medical science had, by mid-century, arrived at a near consensus that isolation was inappropriate. This new information filtered into the policy making soil of both nations and slowly led to the abandonment of isolation. Conceptualizations from the literature offer the bases of a policy learning model centered on the characteristics of a fertile soil for policy learning.

The model considers the nature of the problem, the nature of the information, and the nature of the debate as critical factors shaping the learning of new information. Each factor added to the understanding. The problem, complex and characterized by negatively constructed targets, was not amenable to policy learning, especially in Japan with more victims, more hospitals, more researchers, and more stigmatization. It took considerable time to wrap the information in scientific integrity. In Japan the process was slowed by the war which separated researchers from professional fora at a critical time. Head on, confrontational debates in both nations failed. Success came only when strategies that moderated debate were adopted.


20th Century Economic Policy Critical Factor Medical Science Learning Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badger, L. F. (1955). ‘Leprosy in the United States,’ Public Health Reports 70(6): 525–535.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, T. W. (2002). The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resources. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. deLeon, P. (2002). ‘Commentary,’ Policy Studies Journal, 30(1): 47–52.Google Scholar
  4. deLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  5. Daily Yomiuri (1995, May 5). Hansen's disease may come out of closet.Google Scholar
  6. Dixon, J. and R. Dogan (2004). ‘The conduct of policy analysis: philosophical points of reference,’ Review of Policy Research 21(4): 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunn, W. N. (2004). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Frantz, J. E. (2002). ‘Political Resources for Policy Terminators,’ Policy Studies Journal 30: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furman, B. (1973). A Profile of the United States Public Health Service: 1798–1948. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  10. Guest, R. (1995). ‘Japan could unlock its people with leprosy,’ British Medical Journal 311(6997): 80.Google Scholar
  11. Guest, R. (1996, June 10). ‘Lepers opt to stay as Japan shuts colonies,’ The Daily Telegraph, p. 11.Google Scholar
  12. Gussow, Z. (1989). Leprosy, Racism and Public Health: Social Policy in Chronic Disease Control. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hart, D. and D. Victor (1993). ‘Scientific elites and the making of US policy for climate change research, 1957–1974,’ Social Studies of Science 23: 643–680.Google Scholar
  14. International Journal of Leprosy. (1934). Reports of Meetings. 2(2): 229.Google Scholar
  15. International Journal of Leprosy (1937). International leprosy association: Officers and councillors. 5(2): 127–133.Google Scholar
  16. International Journal of Leprosy (1948). United States: New personnel policy for Carville.Google Scholar
  17. International Journal of Leprosy (1953). The 26th annual meeting of the Japanese leprosy association. 21(3): 387–389.Google Scholar
  18. International Journal of Leprosy (1953). Leprosy news and notes: Sixth international congress of leprosy. 21(4): 485–487.Google Scholar
  19. Japanese Public Law 11 (1907). The matter relating to the prevention of leprosy. 23rd session of the Imperial Diet.Google Scholar
  20. Japanese Public Law. (1931). (Old) leprosy prevention law.Google Scholar
  21. Japanese Public Law 214 (1953 August 15). (New) leprosy prevention law. Revised 1954 Statute 77, 1962 Statute 140 and Statute 161.Google Scholar
  22. Japanese Public Law (1996 February 9). Law relating to the repeal of the (New) Leprosy Law.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and P. A. Sabatier (1993). ‘The dynamics of policy-oriented Learning’ in Hank C. Jenkins-Smith and Paul A. Sabatier, eds., Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
  24. Kalish, P. A. (1973). ‘Lepers, anachronisms, and the progressives: A study in stigma, 1889–1920’, Louisiana Studies Fall 489–531.Google Scholar
  25. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Kitamur, K. (1953). ‘The 26th annual meeting of the Japanese leprosy association’, International Journal of Leprosy,’ 21(3): 387–389.Google Scholar
  27. Kitano, R. (2002). The price of isolation: Public health policy in the United States and Japan with special reference to Hansen's disease. Unpublished paper for the program of U.S. Japan relations at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  28. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Leprosy Review. (1951). Sulphone therapy has now passed the realm of controversy. 23: 3.Google Scholar
  30. Lindblom, C. E. (1995). ‘The science of muddling through,’ Public Administration Review 19(Spring): 79–88.Google Scholar
  31. MacGregor, H. (1996). ‘After decades locked away, Japanese lepers salute life,’ Los Angeles Times, 30 June, Home Edition, Pt. A.Google Scholar
  32. Magnier, M. (2001, May 23). ‘Patients in Japan gain respect,’ Los Angeles Times, A1.Google Scholar
  33. Mermin, J. (1995, June 26). Letter to the editor. Fear, not science, dictated leprosy treatment. New York Times, A 14.Google Scholar
  34. Morrow, P. A. (1899). ‘Leprosy,’ in T. L. Stedman (Ed.). Twentieth Century Practice; An International Encyclopedia of Modern Medical Science by Leading Authorities of Europe and America. Vol. 18, pp. 401–683.Google Scholar
  35. Muir, E. (1937). Editorial: First congress of the international leprosy association: Fourth international leprosy conference. International Journal of Leprosy 5(1): 87–91.Google Scholar
  36. Narita, M. (2003). Interview by Hajime Sato and Janet Frantz, March 2003.Google Scholar
  37. Ohtani, F. (1993) Welcome to all visitors to the H.L.H. Prince Takamatsu Memorial Museum of Hansen's Disease, online. Available: (2002 April 8).
  38. Ohtani, F. (1998). The Walls Crumble: The Emancipation of Persons Affected by Hansen's Disease in Japan. A translation from the Japanese of The history of the repeal of the leprosy prevention law: love conquers, the walls crumble. Tokyo, JP: Integrated Communications Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  40. Sabatier, P. A. (1993). ‘Policy change over a decade or more,’ in Hank C. Jenkins-Smith and Paul A. Sabatier (Eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
  41. Sato, H. (2002). ‘Abolition of leprosy isolation policy in Japan: policy termination through leadership,’ Policy Studies Journal 30(1): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sato, H. and M. Narita (2003, June). ‘Politics of leprosy segregation in Japan: The emergence, transformation and abolition of the patient segregation policy,’ Social Science and Medicine 56(12): 2529–2540.Google Scholar
  43. Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). ‘The semisovereign people; a realist's view of democracy in America,’ Hinsdale, ILL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schneider, A. L. and H. Ingram (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. South China Morning Post (1997, November 15). “Untouchable” souls in quest for dignity. P. 5.Google Scholar
  47. Stein, S. (1948). ‘Editorial: New look at hansen's disease,’ The Star. VIII(2): 8–10.Google Scholar
  48. Stein, S. (1963). Alone No Longer. Carville, LA: The Star.Google Scholar
  49. Stone, D. (2002). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  50. Struck, D. and A. Yamamoto (2001). ‘Japan confronts leprosy's legacy: Court acknowledges decades of confining the curables,’ The Washington Post. 12: May, A01.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Public Law from 55th Congress-2nd session/S Rpt 463 and H. Rpt. 1215-cited in Kalish p. 504.Google Scholar
  52. U.S. Public Law 299 (1917 February 3), 64th Congress, 1st session.Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Public Law 78 (1997, November 11). 105th Congress, 1st session.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. Congress, Senate (1949). National Leprosy Act. Hearing before a subcommittee on health of the committee on labor and public welfare. 81st Congress, 1st session.Google Scholar
  55. U.S. Congress, Senate (1905). Report to accompany S. 7055: Leprosarium for the segregation of lepers, etc. 58th Congress, 3rd session. Report No. 3874.Google Scholar
  56. Watts, J. (1998). ‘Japanese victims of discrimination against lepers sue government,’ Lancet 352: 631.Google Scholar
  57. Watts, J. (2001). ‘Japans government compensates leprosy patients for isolation policy,’ Lancet 357: 1599.Google Scholar
  58. Weiss, C. H. (1977). Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet E. Frantz
    • 1
  • Hajime Sato
    • 2
  1. 1.University of LouisisanaLafayette
  2. 2.University of TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations