Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 1151–1163 | Cite as

Model-free control of unknown nonlinear systems using an iterative learning concept: theoretical development and experimental validation

  • Elmira Madadi
  • Dirk Söffker
Original Paper
  • 234 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a newly developed adaptive model-free control method using an iterative learning control method based on a robust control design framework is discussed. Consequently, no system plant model is required for control design; only the inputs and outputs are used as controller input. Briefly, no assumption is required regarding the system plant model. In this contribution, a fully model-free control method is developed to be applied to unknown nonlinear SISO systems using (i) a modified model-free adaptive scheme to estimate the system local dynamics iteratively, (ii) an optimal weighting matrices design method based on a designable relationship between the system output to its input, and (iii) an iterative learning concept to generate a suitable control input according to the robust design framework. As an example, the task of perfect sinusoidal movement of a cart with a mounted inverted elastic cantilever beam is chosen to validate the performance of the proposed approach. The challenge is to realize the control in the presence of unknown nonlinear interaction of the flexible beam to the moving carts motion. To demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed method, the results obtained are compared with classical and well-known model-based control approaches.

Keywords

Model-free control approach Adaptive iterative learning control Unknown nonlinear dynamical system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is partly supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) through the Research Grants for Doctoral Candidates and Young Academics and Scientists.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Abouaïssa, H., Fliess, M., Join, C.: On ramp metering: towards a better understanding of ALINEA via model-free control. Int. J. Control 90(5), 1018–1026 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T.: The future of PID control. Control Eng. Pract. 9(11), 1163–1175 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amann, N., Owens, D.H., Rogers, E.: Iterative learning control for discrete-time systems with exponential rate of convergence. IEEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 143(2), 217–224 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bristow, D.A., Tharayil, M., Alleyne, A.G.: A survey of iterative learning control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 26(3), 96–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bristow, D.A.: Weighting matrix design for robust monotonic convergence in norm optimal iterative learning control. In: Proceedings of IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 4554–4560 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chi, R., Hou, Zh, Jin, Sh, Wang, D., Chien, C.J.: Enhanced data-driven optimal terminal ILC using current iteration control knowledge. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26(11), 2939–2948 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fliess, M., Join, C.: Model-free control. Int. J. Control 86(12), 2228–2252 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hou, Z., Huang, W.: The model-free learning adaptive control of a class of SISO nonlinear systems. Proc. IEEE Am. Control Conf. 1, 343–344 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hou, Z., Jin, S.: Data-driven model-free adaptive control for a class of MIMO nonlinear discrete-time systems. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22(12), 2173–2188 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou, Z., Zhu, Y.: Controller-dynamic-linearization-based model free adaptive control for discrete-time nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9(4), 2301–2309 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalil, H.K., Grizzle, J.: Nonlinear Systems, vol. 3. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis, F.L., Vamvoudakis, K.G.: Reinforcement learning for partially observable dynamic processes: adaptive dynamic programming using measured output data. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 41(1), 14–25 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luenberger, D.G.: Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, vol. 28. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Madadi, E., Dong, Y., Söffker, D.: Model-Free control approach of a three-tank system using an adaptive-based control. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. V006T10A013-V006T10A013 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norrlöf, M., Gunnarsson, S.: Time and frequency domain convergence properties in iterative learning control. Int. J. Control 75(14), 1114–1126 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogata, K.: Discrete-Time Control Systems, vol. 2. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radac, M.B., Precup, R.E., Petriu, E.M.: Model-free primitive-based iterative learning control approach to trajectory tracking of MIMO systems with experimental validation. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26(11), 2925–2938 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Socha, L.: Linearization Methods for Stochastic Dynamic Systems. Springer, New York (2007). 730zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Zundert, J., Bolder, J., Oomen, T.: Optimality and flexibility in iterative learning control for varying tasks. Automatica 67, 295–302 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Dynamics and ControlUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations