Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 2683–2698 | Cite as

GNSS/IMU laser quadrant detector hybridization techniques for artillery rocket guidance

  • Raúl de Celis
  • Luis Cadarso
Original Article


Enhancing precision has been the essential goal for ballistic rockets since the beginnings of this aircraft class. In the past, ballistic rockets impact point precision deteriorated at the same time as range was extended, specially for those rockets which were nonpropelled and nonguided amid the greater part of their trajectories. Once that inertial and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) navigation and guidance systems were introduced, precision was unlinked from range increments. The fundamental issue for these inertial and GNSS strategies (hybridized or not) is the enormous errors on attitude and position determination during last phases of flight as the movement is governed by aerodynamic forces and moments, which feature a deeply nonlinear character. Choosing another kind of low-cost sensors, independent of accumulative errors and precise on terminal guidance, for example, quadrant photodetector semi-active laser, is crucially essential. Hybridization of nonlinear algorithms, such as extended Kalman filter, joining measurements from sensors such as GNSS, inertial measurement units and photodetectors are described in this paper to be utilized on modified proportional navigation techniques and novel control methods. The results are tested on rocket nonlinear flight simulations in order to prove the accuracy of proposed algorithms.


GNSS/IMU Hybridization Laser Guidance Flight dynamics 



The authors would like to thank to Lieutenant Colonel Jesús Sánchez (NMT) and‘Instituto Tecnológico La Marañosa’ of the National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA) for solid modeling of the concept and for discussions regarding modeling weapon accuracy.


  1. 1.
    Celis, R.d., Cadarso, L., Sánchez, J.: Guidance and control for high dynamic rotating artillery rockets, aerospace science and technology. (2017).
  2. 2.
    Hamilton, R.: Precision guided munitions and the new era of warfare, Air Power Studies Centre, Royal Australian Air Force. Accessed 3 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    Waltz, E.L., Buede, D.M.: Data fusion and decision support for command and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. 16(6), 865–879 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Nguyen, N., Tyan, M., Lee, J. W., Dinh, A. B.: Efficient Framework for Missile Design and 6DoF Simulation using Multi-fidelity Analysis and Data Fusion. In: 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Washington, D.C (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, J., Zhou, R.: Unified approach to cooperative guidance laws against stationary and maneuvering targets. Nonlinear Dyn. 81(4), 1635–1647 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt, G.T., Phillips, R.E.: INS/GPS integration architectures. MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH LEXINGTON MA. (2010). Accessed 3 Jan 2018
  7. 7.
    Bryne, T.H., Hansen, J.M., Rogne, R.H., Sokolova, N., Fossen, T.I., Johansen, T.A.: Nonlinear observers for integrated INSGNSS navigation: implementation aspects. IEEE Control Syst. 37(3), 59–86 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Creagh, M.A., Mee, D.J.: Attitude guidance for spinning vehicles with independent pitch and yaw control. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 33(3), 915–922 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lechevin, N., Rabbath, C.A.: Robust discrete-time proportional-derivative navigation guidance. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 35(3), 1007–1013 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, X., Wang, J., Gao, G.: Partial integrated missile guidance and control with state observer. Nonlinear Dyn. 79(4), 2497–2514 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, H.I., Sun, B.C., Tahk, M.J., Lee, H.: Control design of spinning rockets based on co-evolutionary optimization. Control Eng. Pract. 9(2), 149–157 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nesline, F.W., Zarchan, P.: Line-of-sight reconstruction for faster homing guidance. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 8(1), 3–8 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Y., Sun, M., Chen, Z.: Finite-time convergent guidance law with impact angle constraint based on sliding-mode control. Nonlinear Dyn. 70(1), 619–625 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Theodoulis, S., Gassmann, V., Wernert, P., Dritsas, L., Kitsios, I., Tzes, A.: Guidance and control design for a class of spin-stabilized fin-controlled projectiles. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 36(2), 517–531 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Celis, R.d., Cadarso, L.: Spot-Centroid Linear Determination Algorithms in Semi-Active Laser Photo-diodes Applied in Artillery Terminal-Guidance. In: Defence Science Journal, submitted, 1st round of review (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Sun, T., Han, H. Y. K., Hu, B.: Optical system design with common aperture for mid-infrared and laser composite guildance. In: Second International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering (pp. 102560S–102560S). International Society for Optics and Photonics, February 2017Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, Y.: Remote Evaluation of rotational velocity using a quadrant photo-detector and a DSC algorithm. Sensors 16(5), 587 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Esper-Chain, R., Escuela, A.M., Farina, D., Sendra, J.R.: Configurable quadrant photodetector: an improved position sensitive device. IEEE Sens. J. 16(1), 109–119 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Institute for Aviation Training and Accreditation, Rey Juan Carlos UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations